Bush's pattern of lies

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
29,391
2,738
126
CNN

...not that single episode [IRAQ + Uranium], but the broader pattern of dishonesty and delusion that helped get us into the Iraq mess -- and that created the false expectations undermining our occupation today. Some in the administration are trying to make George Tenet the scapegoat for the affair.
 

phillyTIM

Golden Member
Jan 12, 2001
1,942
10
81
yeah it's time the Bush Regime is held accountable for their other false accusations made against other situations in the world

the Regime changes comments/stories and uses Bush-ism words (not real words) to create an environment of confusion, and expect that the American people will err on the side of whatever convenient excuse the Regime makes at the time it is held accountable.
 

308nato

Platinum Member
Feb 10, 2002
2,674
0
0
Originally posted by: phillyTIM
yeah it's time the Bush Regime is held accountable for their other false accusations made against other situations in the world

the Regime changes comments/stories and uses Bush-ism words (not real words) to create an environment of confusion, and expect that the American people will err on the side of whatever convenient excuse the Regime makes at the time it is held accountable.



This post has created an environment of confusion.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,818
6,778
126
The American people are not intelligent enough nor do they have the fine training required to understand what is best for the country. We had to get involved in an illegal war and we needed to lie about the reasons because we have the power to take what is to our advantage. Small people don't have the guts and brains for that kind of bold thinking. That's why a hidden group has seized power and is wielding it in our interests. We will win as long as the voter can be kept away. Trust me, you are too dumb to understand. Accept your programming and go back to sleep. It's a New American Century.
 

BeauJangles

Lifer
Aug 26, 2001
13,941
1
0
Moonbeam, you are arguing that a small group of individuals shoudl run the country because the general population is too lethargic / stupid to do it themselves. What about when this small group no longer acts in the interest of the greater good but only in their own interests (as Bush has done)?
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,818
6,778
126
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Moonbeam, you are arguing that a small group of individuals shoudl run the country because the general population is too lethargic / stupid to do it themselves. What about when this small group no longer acts in the interest of the greater good but only in their own interests (as Bush has done)?

They are the elite; they are the visionaries; they are the realists with the courage to see and face the future. They define the greater good. You are not of that class. You wouldn't understand. Please don't vote.
 

JoeBaD

Banned
May 24, 2000
822
0
0
Don't you all get tired of babbling the same old crap. Although I haven't heard moonbeam tell us that Bush lost the election in a day or two.

Why don't all you naive liberals just get together for a good ol' circle jerk. You'ld probably feel better.

(that is if you haven't already) :)

 

BeauJangles

Lifer
Aug 26, 2001
13,941
1
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Moonbeam, you are arguing that a small group of individuals shoudl run the country because the general population is too lethargic / stupid to do it themselves. What about when this small group no longer acts in the interest of the greater good but only in their own interests (as Bush has done)?

They are the elite; they are the visionaries; they are the realists with the courage to see and face the future. They define the greater good. You are not of that class. You wouldn't understand. Please don't vote.

Well, they may be smarter than everyone else, but sooner or later they will realize its not in their best interest to serve the common good. They become oppressive and turn the nation into an oligarchy in which only their own interests are served. Also, how can they define the greater good? What the hope is in a society is to serve the greatest good (ie purely qualitatively). Therefore if their decisions serve only themselves, they cannot be serving the "greater good".

Thus, although the general population may not be as intelligent, they are better for the overall country.
 

InfectedMushroom

Golden Member
Aug 15, 2001
1,064
0
0

BlindBomber: I am quite sure Moonbeams comments were meant to be sarcastic, not taken at face value.

JoeBaD: do big words and new ideas scare you that much?
 

ITJunkie

Platinum Member
Apr 17, 2003
2,512
0
76
www.techange.com
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
The American people are not intelligent enough nor do they have the fine training required to understand what is best for the country. We had to get involved in an illegal war and we needed to lie about the reasons because we have the power to take what is to our advantage. Small people don't have the guts and brains for that kind of bold thinking. That's why a hidden group has seized power and is wielding it in our interests. We will win as long as the voter can be kept away. Trust me, you are too dumb to understand. Accept your programming and go back to sleep. It's a New American Century.

OK...I will. But I want to wake up as movie star and be filthy rich. Is it a deal Agent Smith?
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,818
6,778
126
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
oops
No need for an oops, Blinder. It is very important that you be able to defend that position and try to see deeply into the issues involved. What is the greater good? Who knows what it is? Is it possible to divine a greater good or is all truth relative. What is the madness called certainty? Is there more than one kind. What is the responsibility of those who can see? How do they differ from those who think they can?

We have not really been trained to think, I think.


 

RobCur

Banned
Oct 4, 2002
3,076
0
0
To all bushy hater, he is our president. We have to support him even if it mean that he has done many wrong thing. No one is as brave and as cunning as he is, I certainly will risk my life to save his. He sure has done a lot to help our nation. Like I said, if you can't beat the crowd, join them. They are almost never wrong. Peace out.

 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam

They are the elite; they are the visionaries; they are the realists with the courage to see and face the future. They define the greater good. You are not of that class. You wouldn't understand. Please don't vote.
Can we flush the toilet and get all the turds (or even some of the turds) out of Washington? It's not enough to just swirl around the bowl of turds.

Is there anyone outside of that class that is worthy of a vote? I'm not trying to be confrontational; I'm truly interested in knowing. More to the point, are there electable people that will bring reform? Or is it as impossible as I have felt it to be?

It's not that I don't think there are people worthy and capable of doing a better job, I just don't think any of those folks are electable, or will be elected in enough numbers given the power and special interests of the political machines behind both major parties, to make any real change.

I think you know I don't vote, never have. I'd like to one day but so far the track record has proven to me that it's pointless. As we go down this road, we step a little to this side or we step a little to that side, but no matter what happens, I can't seem to avoid getting sh!t on my shoes. Maybe it's the road.

 

TheBDB

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2002
3,176
0
0
Originally posted by: RobCur
To all bushy hater, he is our president. We have to support him even if it mean that he has done many wrong thing. No one is as brave and as cunning as he is, I certainly will risk my life to save his. He sure has done a lot to help our nation. Like I said, if you can't beat the crowd, join them. They are almost never wrong. Peace out.

Hahahaha.

rolleye.gif
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,818
6,778
126
Originally posted by: jjones
Originally posted by: Moonbeam

They are the elite; they are the visionaries; they are the realists with the courage to see and face the future. They define the greater good. You are not of that class. You wouldn't understand. Please don't vote.
Can we flush the toilet and get all the turds (or even some of the turds) out of Washington? It's not enough to just swirl around the bowl of turds.

Is there anyone outside of that class that is worthy of a vote? I'm not trying to be confrontational; I'm truly interested in knowing. More to the point, are there electable people that will bring reform? Or is it as impossible as I have felt it to be?

It's not that I don't think there are people worthy and capable of doing a better job, I just don't think any of those folks are electable, or will be elected in enough numbers given the power and special interests of the political machines behind both major parties, to make any real change.

I think you know I don't vote, never have. I'd like to one day but so far the track record has proven to me that it's pointless. As we go down this road, we step a little to this side or we step a little to that side, but no matter what happens, I can't seem to avoid getting sh!t on my shoes. Maybe it's the road.

Why don't you start a thread devoted just to this. It's such an important question it deserves one all its own.
=========================
To all bushy hater, he is our president. We have to support him even if it mean that he has done many wrong thing. No one is as brave and as cunning as he is, I certainly will risk my life to save his. He sure has done a lot to help our nation. Like I said, if you can't beat the crowd, join them. They are almost never wrong. Peace out.
------------------
You will be glad to know, Rob, that Gore won. The crowd elected him.


 

InfectedMushroom

Golden Member
Aug 15, 2001
1,064
0
0
Originally posted by: RobCur
To all bushy hater, he is our president. We have to support him even if it mean that he has done many wrong thing. No one is as brave and as cunning as he is, I certainly will risk my life to save his. He sure has done a lot to help our nation. Like I said, if you can't beat the crowd, join them. They are almost never wrong. Peace out.

Take the above statement. Replace bushy with Hitler around 1937-38.
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
Originally posted by: Moonbeam


Why don't you start a thread devoted just to this. It's such an important question it deserves one all its own.
Okay, I will. I agree it is such an important question, at least for me, and one that's been troubling me my whole adult life.

Give me a moment to take a break (family obligations) and compose my thoughts and I'll open the topic in a little while.

 

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
29,391
2,738
126
Originally posted by: RobCur
To all bushy hater, he is our president. We have to support him even if it mean that he has done many wrong thing. No one is as brave and as cunning as he is, I certainly will risk my life to save his. He sure has done a lot to help our nation. Like I said, if you can't beat the crowd, join them. They are almost never wrong. Peace out.

we have to support him because he's our president?! hahahahahahahahahahahahhahaha

How about if i send him a bag of prezels? :D