xj0hnx
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2007
- 9,262
- 3
- 76
Which is....what? Sounds interesting. Please explain, if you will.
Maybe try reading, the problem has been mentioned, by me even in this very thread.
Which is....what? Sounds interesting. Please explain, if you will.
Exactly the current problem, as soon as American legislators talk about banning assault rifles, a few American companies may sell off their investments in Bushmaster. Only one of the makers of civilian versions of AR-15 military assault rifles, while a vaster American civilian market will flock to and buy other assault rifles and ammunition before before any Federal ban takes place. As hurry hurry all ye gun nuts, rush to buy up even more Assault rifles before its too late.
But even then, maybe we can trust the legitimate American gun owners, but when they leave their homes, burglars will proceed to steal their gun collections, and then resell them to anyone regardless of how nutty they are for cheap cheap cheap as our American criminals and total nutcases can become armed with high quality firearms.
Exactly the current problem, as soon as American legislators talk about banning assault rifles, a few American companies may sell off their investments in Bushmaster. Only one of the makers of civilian versions of AR-15 military assault rifles, while a vaster American civilian market will flock to and buy other assault rifles and ammunition before before any Federal ban takes place. As hurry hurry all ye gun nuts, rush to buy up even more Assault rifles before its too late.
But even then, maybe we can trust the legitimate American gun owners, but when they leave their homes, burglars will proceed to steal their gun collections, and then resell them to anyone regardless of how nutty they are for cheap cheap cheap as our American criminals and total nutcases can become armed with high quality firearms.
When $1000 rifles get stolen, they get sold to pawn shops, not to criminals. Even criminals looking for black market guns are buying in the $100 range.
When $1000 rifles get stolen, they get sold to pawn shops, not to criminals. Even criminals looking for black market guns are buying in the $100 range.
No, they don't. Police check pawn shops, and run all serial numbers at least weekly. Criminals that want an AR15 for doing dirt are just as likely to steal it themselves.
The tool is irrelevant, once you and the rest of the anti-gun progressives get past your aversion to a tool, you can get on board with helping to solve the actual problem.
Maybe try reading, the problem has been mentioned, by me even in this very thread.
No pawn dealer would ever knowingly or willing purchase a stolen item. Especially if they want to stay in business and not get shut down by the police who have no problem checking pawn shops for stolen goods. Second of all they'd also need to be licensed to be able to buy and sell firearms. Attaining that license costs a lot of money so they would never allow themselves to buy possibly stolen firearm which would put their license in jeopardy.
So they check pawn shops for no reason then? Think about what you've just said. The common criminal committing random acts of violence DOES NOT want an AR15.
Thanks for your reply. I followed this thread with interest from the start. You addressed quite a few "problems" <---(plural) in it. I was wondering what specific "problem" <----(singular) that you singularly referred to in the post I quoted you from.
But hey, no prob. I just wanted to reply to your post within the context you delivered it in and not throw darts at it. *Moved on*
Why would they check for stolen guns if they never found any? Were talking about modern departments on strained budgets. Here's a hint from a former cop, its because they find stolen items, including firearms.
There are plenty of "legal" ways to sell a stolen firearm, such as a face to face transfer which has no paper trail. Post a message on an online trading board and sell to someone who wants a gun for legal reasons.
When $1000 rifles get stolen, they get sold to pawn shops, not to criminals. Even criminals looking for black market guns are buying in the $100 range.
Mental health issues are the problem. Continual infringement on the rights of millions of law abiding citizens because people don't want to address the real problem is bullshit.
Wouldn't the fact that the gun succeeded in doing what it was meant to do--shoot and hit targets--effectively serve as an advertisement for Bushmaster rifles?
in a cynical view, this tragedy serves many purposes
- news stations extra viewers, more $$
Exactly the current problem, as soon as American legislators talk about banning assault rifles, a few American companies may sell off their investments in Bushmaster. Only one of the makers of civilian versions of AR-15 military assault rifles, while a vaster American civilian market will flock to and buy other assault rifles and ammunition before before any Federal ban takes place. As hurry hurry all ye gun nuts, rush to buy up even more Assault rifles before its too late.
Assault rifles are already banned unless you have $25k of disposable income to drop on a rifle. Please educate yourself before you speak.
That's the problem.
People have different definitions of the term "Assault Rifle." I'm guessing you're including selective fire including in some cases full auto in your definition.
Anyway a semi auto rate of fire and ease of reloading is all you really need...
An assault rifle is capable of full auto, by definition.
Calling a semiautomatic rifle an "assault rifle" is incorrect. This would be an "assault rifle" under your absurd definition:
So you know what my definition of an Assault Rifle is? ok. /shrug.
So you know what my definition of an Assault Rifle is? ok. /shrug.
*edit*
I was going to add "to kill or injure a large number of people" to the last sentence in my previous post but didn't feel like going into that at the time.
The point was you don't need an "assault rifle" to kill or injure many people so a new ban wouldn't do much.