• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Bush to meet with Schwarzenegger: Can CA expect help now that our governor has an (R)?

Will California get federal assistance dealing with its fiscal issues now that we have a Republican gov? Now that those pesky partisan differences are no longer a factor between Bush and Davis, do Rove & Co believe they can take CA in 2004 if they finally act like they care about one of the country's largest states? Thus far, CA has rec'd jack squat in support from the feds -- even during the energy crisis, the message from Bush was pretty much "pound sand California." 🙂

CNN.com

Bush tries to build on Schwarzenegger's political success
Meeting set for Thursday

DINUBA, California (AP) -- President Bush, hoping to share in Arnold Schwarzenegger's political success and build support in vote-rich California, said Wednesday "there's been some interesting changes" since he lost the state to Democrat Al Gore three years ago.

Bush's understated reference to California's political upheaval was greeted with appreciative cheers and whistles at a Fresno fund-raising lunch where he collected $750,000 for his re-election campaign. The president said he would meet with Schwarzenegger on Thursday and "have the honor of congratulating the governor-elect."

Bush picked up another $1 million later at a fund-raiser in Riverside -- swelling a re-election war chest that already has roughly $84 million. (Full story)

Bush came here to talk about the economy and the war on terrorism, but Mideast violence hung over his visit.

The president spoke in this central California village on a day when three Americans were killed in the bombing of a U.S. diplomatic convoy in the Gaza Strip. Warning that terrorists still pose a danger, Bush said: "They continue to plot. They continue to plan against our country and our people. America must not forget the lessons of September 11."

Bush was greeted warmly in the bright sunshine in Dinuba outside Ruiz Foods, billed as the nation's largest producer of frozen Mexican foods. "For a man who likes burritos, I'm in heaven," Bush said to the crowd's delight.

The president faces a tough decision about whether to wage a costly re-election campaign in California, which offers more electoral votes than any other state: 55 of the 270 needed for election.

Three years ago Bush decided to chase after the big prize and poured millions of dollars into California -- but wound up losing by more than 1.2 million votes.

"I know there's been some interesting changes here in the state of California," Bush said as he opened his remarks in Fresno.

Schwarzenegger's victory offers Bush encouragement to try again, although Republicans say there are reasons to be cautious. With Schwarzenegger in office, Republicans inherit responsibility for solving California's huge budget problems and Bush no longer can base his campaign on running against an unpopular Democratic governor.

On the other hand, the recall election swelled Republican voter registrations and contributions. Schwarzenegger and rival Republican Tom McClintock wound up with 62 percent of the vote. Still, registered Democrats outnumber Republicans 44 percent to 33 percent.
 
Odd, when Davis was in office the Repbulics did all they could to ruin California's economy, with help from their friends at Enron no less.

Now an action hero has usurped the governorship through the efforts of a right wing Republic who spent $1.7 million of his own money and the Bush administration is having Arnold over for tea.

HYPOCRITES!
 
Originally posted by: SuperTool
We don't need help, we just need Bush's cronies to return our stolen money.

There is a saying, "Behind every fortune is a crime."

We are witnessing the crime behind the Bush/Cheney fortunes, and the crime is our current "leadership."
 
Originally posted by: BOBDN
Originally posted by: SuperTool
We don't need help, we just need Bush's cronies to return our stolen money.

There is a saying, "Behind every fortune is a crime."

We are witnessing the crime behind the Bush/Cheney fortunes, and the crime is our current "leadership."

Every day, the onion is peeled back another layer.

Rich people can't possibly have earned their money, they stole it.
 
Originally posted by: BOBDN
Odd, when Davis was in office the Repbulics did all they could to ruin California's economy, with help from their friends at Enron no less.

Now an action hero has usurped the governorship through the efforts of a right wing Republic who spent $1.7 million of his own money and the Bush administration is having Arnold over for tea.

HYPOCRITES!

Well, it's almost a year until the election so Bush has to appear to stop giving us the middle finger. He spent the last three years doing that because we gave him the middle finger in 2000.

Anyway, I don't think Bush will take the state. Arnold was a famous, liberal republican and that's why he won. Bush is too conservative to win here, although I'm sure he'll spend a lot of money here saying he's a moderate.
 
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: BOBDN
Originally posted by: SuperTool
We don't need help, we just need Bush's cronies to return our stolen money.

There is a saying, "Behind every fortune is a crime."

We are witnessing the crime behind the Bush/Cheney fortunes, and the crime is our current "leadership."

Every day, the onion is peeled back another layer.

Rich people can't possibly have earned their money, they stole it.

Can't say that his comments(or Supertrool's either) were very suprising though. He's professed his hatred for anyone who becomse "rich" or sucessful.

On-topic: Bush would have met with any of the candidates if they had become Govenor. California faces a big problem so I don't find it odd that Bush would go out there.

CkG
 
Originally posted by: rockyct
Originally posted by: BOBDN
Odd, when Davis was in office the Repbulics did all they could to ruin California's economy, with help from their friends at Enron no less.

Now an action hero has usurped the governorship through the efforts of a right wing Republic who spent $1.7 million of his own money and the Bush administration is having Arnold over for tea.

HYPOCRITES!

Well, it's almost a year until the election so Bush has to appear to stop giving us the middle finger. He spent the last three years doing that because we gave him the middle finger in 2000.

Anyway, I don't think Bush will take the state. Arnold was a famous, liberal republican and that's why he won. Bush is too conservative to win here, although I'm sure he'll spend a lot of money here saying he's a moderate.

Just as he spent hundreds of millions in 2000 lying to everyone about being a "compassionate conservative."

Those terms are mutually exclusive as we have now all painfully learned. At least those of us who are honest enough to admit it.
 
I don't know about Bush taking CA in 2004, but a study of the recall election votes showed that the inland regions of CA were becoming more and more conservative. Thus supporting my theory that the farther you live from an ocean, the more conservative you become. I guess take that for what it's worth...
 
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: BOBDN
Originally posted by: SuperTool
We don't need help, we just need Bush's cronies to return our stolen money.

There is a saying, "Behind every fortune is a crime."

We are witnessing the crime behind the Bush/Cheney fortunes, and the crime is our current "leadership."

Every day, the onion is peeled back another layer.

Rich people can't possibly have earned their money, they stole it.

Can't say that his comments(or Supertrool's either) were very suprising though. He's professed his hatred for anyone who becomse "rich" or sucessful.

On-topic: Bush would have met with any of the candidates if they had become Govenor. California faces a big problem so I don't find it odd that Bush would go out there.

CkG

What does this have to do with rich vs. poor? It has to do with companies who wrongfully manipulated CA energy markets, an administration that received campaign donations from these companies, which appointed FERC commissioners handpicked by those companies, who in turn turned a blind eye on CA as those companies robbed it, and later acknowledged that there has been market manipulation but refused to force disgorgement of these unlawful gains, or cancellation of contracts resulting from these manipulations. Both rich and poor in CA were hurt by this, both businesses and employees, utilities and consumers. So unlike what these class war rightwingers tell you, it's not a rich vs. poor issue, it's Bush administration and it's cronies vs. the people of California issue.
 
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: BOBDN
Originally posted by: SuperTool
We don't need help, we just need Bush's cronies to return our stolen money.

There is a saying, "Behind every fortune is a crime."

We are witnessing the crime behind the Bush/Cheney fortunes, and the crime is our current "leadership."

Every day, the onion is peeled back another layer.

Rich people can't possibly have earned their money, they stole it.

Can't say that his comments(or Supertrool's either) were very suprising though. He's professed his hatred for anyone who becomse "rich" or sucessful.

On-topic: Bush would have met with any of the candidates if they had become Govenor. California faces a big problem so I don't find it odd that Bush would go out there.

CkG

What does this have to do with rich vs. poor? It has to do with companies who wrongfully manipulated CA energy markets, an administration that received campaign donations from these companies, which appointed FERC commissioners handpicked by those companies, who in turn turned a blind eye on CA as those companies robbed it, and later acknowledged that there has been market manipulation but refused to force disgorgement of these unlawful gains, or cancellation of contracts resulting from these manipulations. Both rich and poor in CA were hurt by this, both businesses and employees, utilities and consumers. So unlike what these class war rightwingers tell you, it's not a rich vs. poor issue, it's Bush administration and it's cronies vs. the people of California issue.

"What does this have to do with rich vs. poor?" - Ask BOBDN
"So unlike what these class war rightwingers tell you, it's not a rich vs. poor issue, it's Bush administration and it's cronies vs. the people of California issue" - BOBDN and YOU brought up the money issue. My reply was about alchemize's assesment of BOBDN and his "Behind every fortune is a crime." spew.

CA's energy problem was their own doing. Davis didn't handle it well, and CA got fscked. You can't blame deregulation for all the problems, and you sure as hell can't blame Bush for them either.

CkG
 
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: BOBDN
Originally posted by: SuperTool
We don't need help, we just need Bush's cronies to return our stolen money.

There is a saying, "Behind every fortune is a crime."

We are witnessing the crime behind the Bush/Cheney fortunes, and the crime is our current "leadership."

Every day, the onion is peeled back another layer.

Rich people can't possibly have earned their money, they stole it.

Can't say that his comments(or Supertrool's either) were very suprising though. He's professed his hatred for anyone who becomse "rich" or sucessful.

On-topic: Bush would have met with any of the candidates if they had become Govenor. California faces a big problem so I don't find it odd that Bush would go out there.

CkG

What does this have to do with rich vs. poor? It has to do with companies who wrongfully manipulated CA energy markets, an administration that received campaign donations from these companies, which appointed FERC commissioners handpicked by those companies, who in turn turned a blind eye on CA as those companies robbed it, and later acknowledged that there has been market manipulation but refused to force disgorgement of these unlawful gains, or cancellation of contracts resulting from these manipulations. Both rich and poor in CA were hurt by this, both businesses and employees, utilities and consumers. So unlike what these class war rightwingers tell you, it's not a rich vs. poor issue, it's Bush administration and it's cronies vs. the people of California issue.

"What does this have to do with rich vs. poor?" - Ask BOBDN
"So unlike what these class war rightwingers tell you, it's not a rich vs. poor issue, it's Bush administration and it's cronies vs. the people of California issue" - BOBDN and YOU brought up the money issue. My reply was about alchemize's assesment of BOBDN and his "Behind every fortune is a crime." spew.

CA's energy problem was their own doing. Davis didn't handle it well, and CA got fscked. You can't blame deregulation for all the problems, and you sure as hell can't blame Bush for them either.

CkG

Actually it isn't my "spew." It's a quote from Honore de Balzac, "Behind every great fortune there is a crime."

A quote whose truth is exhibited by the leaders you so tirelessly defend, Bush/Cheney and the rest of their administration.

To suggest I or anyone here brought up the money issue is ridiculous. Since day one class warfare has been waged by members of the Bush administration who have emptied the US Treasury and shared the surplus that they inherited from President Clinton with their friends. We are now facing, as you must surely know, a record budget deficit along with costs for their unnecessary war in Iraq of, so far, approximately $200 BILLION.

California's energy problem was due to market manipulation by Enron, the company whose CEO, Ken Lay, is a close personal friend of George W. Bush and the man who Dick Cheney allowed to set US energy policy in Washington in 2000. The same Ken Lay who had the Bush administration fire the head of the Energy Department when he refused to agree to Lay's plans to do to the USA what he did to Enron.
 
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: BOBDN
Originally posted by: SuperTool
We don't need help, we just need Bush's cronies to return our stolen money.

There is a saying, "Behind every fortune is a crime."

We are witnessing the crime behind the Bush/Cheney fortunes, and the crime is our current "leadership."

Every day, the onion is peeled back another layer.

Rich people can't possibly have earned their money, they stole it.

Can't say that his comments(or Supertrool's either) were very suprising though. He's professed his hatred for anyone who becomse "rich" or sucessful.

On-topic: Bush would have met with any of the candidates if they had become Govenor. California faces a big problem so I don't find it odd that Bush would go out there.

CkG

What does this have to do with rich vs. poor? It has to do with companies who wrongfully manipulated CA energy markets, an administration that received campaign donations from these companies, which appointed FERC commissioners handpicked by those companies, who in turn turned a blind eye on CA as those companies robbed it, and later acknowledged that there has been market manipulation but refused to force disgorgement of these unlawful gains, or cancellation of contracts resulting from these manipulations. Both rich and poor in CA were hurt by this, both businesses and employees, utilities and consumers. So unlike what these class war rightwingers tell you, it's not a rich vs. poor issue, it's Bush administration and it's cronies vs. the people of California issue.

"What does this have to do with rich vs. poor?" - Ask BOBDN
"So unlike what these class war rightwingers tell you, it's not a rich vs. poor issue, it's Bush administration and it's cronies vs. the people of California issue" - BOBDN and YOU brought up the money issue. My reply was about alchemize's assesment of BOBDN and his "Behind every fortune is a crime." spew.

CA's energy problem was their own doing. Davis didn't handle it well, and CA got fscked. You can't blame deregulation for all the problems, and you sure as hell can't blame Bush for them either.

CkG

It's FERC's job to prevent this market manipulation. FERC appointed the FERC commisioners, therefore ultimate blame lies with Bush. The campaign contributions were protection money from Enron. We give you cash and plane, your FERC turns a blind eye on market manipulation. Sounds like bribery to me, but politics as usual in Washington.
 
which appointed FERC commissioners handpicked by those companies, who in turn turned a blind eye on CA as those companies robbed it, and later acknowledged that there has been market manipulation but refused to force disgorgement of these unlawful gains,

yup, never forget, bush f*cked california. he can go f*ck himself. arnold needs to wail on him.
 
Back
Top