Bush thread:9-5-07 President Bush notified of nuclear mistake, 6 armed nuclear missles flown over U.S. by mistake

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,894
46
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
We could've offed ourselves.

Where were these 6 armed nuclear missles supposed to go?

9-5-2007 President Bush notified of nuclear mistake, 6 armed nuclear missles flown over U.S. by mistake

A B-52 bomber flew the length of the United States mistakenly loaded with as many as six nuclear armed cruise missiles, a US military official confirmed Wednesday.

The mix-up was reported to President George W. Bush after the nuclear warheads were discovered when the aircraft landed at Barksdale Air Force Base Louisiana, the official said.

The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said as many as six cruise missiles loaded on to the plane were found to have nuclear warheads on them by mistake.

===================================================
There may be joy in Mudville afterall.

8-20-2007 Leahy going after Bush aides including the almighty Rove:


====================================================
6-18-2007 Over 30,000 E-mails missing from Bush Administration

Hopefully this puts the criminals away and we see a perp walk for this traitor.

=====================================================

9-15-06 11am - Another Fear & Terror speeach just 4 days after 9-11, must be Election season.

I can't get to a TV right now, anyone watching our hero???


Bush Fear & Terrer speeach #8146

8-14-2006 3:30 pm

Global War on Terrer

Must transform U.S. forces to combat multiple terrer threats

Hezbollah Hezbollah Hezbollah

Suffering from their state within a state

Iran Nuclear

Syria Syria Syria

Hezbollah and it's foreign sponsors

Advance of Liberty

Radical Extremism

September 11 2001

World Trade Center

Libert Liberty Liberty



===============================
I don't even have words for this.

:(

rose.gif
for America

8-6-2006 Half of U.S. still believes Iraq had WMD

Do you believe in Iraqi "WMD"?

Did Saddam Hussein's government have weapons of mass destruction in 2003?

Half of America apparently still thinks so, a new poll finds, and experts see a raft of reasons why:

a drumbeat of voices from talk radio

die-hard bloggers

the Oval Office

a surprise headline here or there

rallying around a partisan flag

and a growing need for people, in their own minds, to justify the war in Iraq

"For some it almost becomes independent of reality and becomes very partisan." The WMD believers are heavily Republican, polls show.

People tend to become "independent of reality" in these circumstances, says opinion analyst Steven Kull.

The reality in this case is that after a 16-month, $900-million-plus investigation, the U.S. weapons hunters known as the Iraq Survey Group declared that Iraq had dismantled its chemical, biological and nuclear arms programs in 1991 under U.N. oversight. That finding in 2004 reaffirmed the work of U.N. inspectors who in 2002-03 found no trace of banned arsenals in Iraq.

Despite this, a Harris Poll released July 21 found that a full 50 percent of U.S. respondents ? up from 36 percent last year ? said they believe Iraq did have the forbidden arms when U.S. troops invaded in March 2003, an attack whose stated purpose was elimination of supposed WMD. Other polls also have found an enduring American faith in the WMD story.

"I'm flabbergasted," said Michael Massing, a media critic whose writings dissected the largely unquestioning U.S. news reporting on the Bush administration's shaky WMD claims in 2002-03.

"This finding just has to cause despair among those of us who hope for an informed public able to draw reasonable conclusions based on evidence," Massing said.

Charles Duelfer, the lead U.S. inspector who announced the negative WMD findings two years ago, has watched uncertainly as TV sound bites, bloggers and politicians try to chip away at "the best factual account," his group's densely detailed, 1,000-page final report.

"It is easy to see what is accepted as truth rapidly morph from one representation to another," he said in an e-mail. "It would be a shame if one effect of the power of the Internet was to undermine any commonly agreed set of facts."

The creative "morphing" goes on.

As Israeli troops and Hezbollah guerrillas battled in Lebanon on July 21, a Fox News segment suggested, with no evidence, yet another destination for the supposed doomsday arms.

"ARE SADDAM HUSSEIN'S WMDS NOW IN HEZBOLLAH'S HANDS?" asked the headline, lingering for long minutes on TV screens in a million American homes.
================================================

It's actually appropriate that the family that destroyed the U.S. continue.

The same as the Ming Dynasty that made China what it is today.

The two Countries are the same.

They are both controlling Governments with heads of each Government at the top of the money heap.

5-10-2006 Bush Backs Brother Jeb for White House

ORLANDO, Fla. - President Bush suggested Wednesday that he'd like to see his family's White House legacy continue, perhaps with his younger brother Jeb as the chief executive.

The president said Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is well-suited for another office and would make "a great president."

Jeb Bush, 53, will end his second term as governor in January. His brother George ends his second presidential term in January 2009. Neither can seek re-election because of term limits.

Jeb Bush has repeatedly said he is not going to run in 2008.

But even his own father said no one believes him when he says he's not interested in running

They had a private lunch together with political supporters and appeared together before television cameras to express concern about wildfires that were blazing across the state.

======================================================
The really sad part about this is the lie that the American Sheeple believe by the Republicans.

The clear pattern is that Republicans borrow and hedge future generations to bolster themselves in the short term at the sacrifice of the Country for the long term.

If the American people don't wake up in time, the Country will be dead.

3-28-2006 US debt clock running out of time, space

So rapid is the rise of the US national debt, that the last four digits of a giant digital signboard counting the moving total near New York's Times Square move in seemingly random increments as they struggle to keep pace.

The clock's owner, real estate developer Douglas Durst, knew such a problem could arise but hadn't counted on it so soon.

"We really expected it to be quite some time," Durst told AFP. "But now, with the pace of debt growth only increasing, we're looking at maybe two years and certainly before President (George W.) Bush leaves office in 2009."

The clock was the invention of Durst's father, Seymour Durst, who nursed a keen sense of fiscal responsibility and believed government profligacy to be a national curse.

The elder Durst, who died in 1995, originally thought of the idea in the early 1980s as the US budget deficit started to mount during the presidency of Ronald Reagan

Toward the close of the millennium, with a booming economy fuelling annual budget surpluses, the clock began to slow and finally ran into its first mechanical problem.

"It wasn't designed to run backwards," Douglas Durst explained.

Believing that the signboard had served its purpose, the Dursts pulled the plug in 2000 with the debt total showing around 5.7 trillion dollars and the individual "family share" standing at close to 74,000 dollars.

The clock was covered with a red, white and blue curtain, but not dismantled.

"We'll have it ready in case things start turning around, which I'm sure they will," Durst said at the time.

He only had to wait two years as the Bush presidency coincided with an upsurge in borrowing. The curtain was raised in 2002 and the digital readout flickered back to life showing a national debt of 6.1 trillion dollars with the numerals whizzing round faster than ever.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,894
46
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
A man enters a bar and orders a drink. The bar has a robot bartender. The robot serves him a perfectly prepared cocktail, and then asks him, "What's your IQ?"


The man replies "150" and the robot proceeds to make conversation about global warning factors, quantum physics and spirituality, biomimicry, ennvironmental interconnectedness, string theory, nano-technology, and sexual proclivities.


The customer is very impressed and thinks, "This is really cool." He decides to test the robot. He walks out of the bar, turns around, and comes back in for another drink. Again, the robot serves him the perfectly prepared drink and asks him, "What's your IQ?"


The man responds, "about a 100". Immediately the robot starts talking, but this time, about football, NASCAR, baseball, supermodels, favorite fast food, guns and women's breasts.


Really impressed, the man leaves the bar and decides to give the robot one more test. He heads out and returns, the robot serves him and asks, "What's your IQ?" The man replies, "Er, 50, I think."


And the robot says... real slowly..."So........ya gonna vote for Bush again?"
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,561
4
0
So much for the Republicans becoming the new dominant party.
They control the Presdency and the Congress by borrowing huge amounts of money to essentially buy votes. And they only managed to squeek by in most elections. When the bill comes due it may very well signal a long term decline of the Republicans. It might take 30 years til anyone trusts them with the budget again.
 

catnap1972

Platinum Member
Aug 10, 2000
2,607
0
76
Originally posted by: dmcowen674


3-28-2006 US debt clock running out of time, space

So rapid is the rise of the US national debt, that the last four digits of a giant digital signboard counting the moving total near New York's Times Square move in seemingly random increments as they struggle to keep pace.

The clock's owner, real estate developer Douglas Durst, knew such a problem could arise but hadn't counted on it so soon.

"We really expected it to be quite some time," Durst told AFP. "But now, with the pace of debt growth only increasing, we're looking at maybe two years and certainly before President (George W.) Bush leaves office in 2009."

The clock was the invention of Durst's father, Seymour Durst, who nursed a keen sense of fiscal responsibility and believed government profligacy to be a national curse.

The elder Durst, who died in 1995, originally thought of the idea in the early 1980s as the US budget deficit started to mount during the presidency of Ronald Reagan

Toward the close of the millennium, with a booming economy fuelling annual budget surpluses, the clock began to slow and finally ran into its first mechanical problem.

"It wasn't designed to run backwards," Douglas Durst explained.

Believing that the signboard had served its purpose, the Dursts pulled the plug in 2000 with the debt total showing around 5.7 trillion dollars and the individual "family share" standing at close to 74,000 dollars.

The clock was covered with a red, white and blue curtain, but not dismantled.

"We'll have it ready in case things start turning around, which I'm sure they will," Durst said at the time.

He only had to wait two years as the Bush presidency coincided with an upsurge in borrowing. The curtain was raised in 2002 and the digital readout flickered back to life showing a national debt of 6.1 trillion dollars with the numerals whizzing round faster than ever.

Does it roll over if it goes over 10T? If so, watch the apologists here claim "See, back to zero--and you stupid libs were worried for nothing! The country is in even better shape than we figured!"

 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,234
701
126
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
A man enters a bar and orders a drink. The bar has a robot bartender. The robot serves him a perfectly prepared cocktail, and then asks him, "What's your IQ?"


The man replies "150" and the robot proceeds to make conversation about global warning factors, quantum physics and spirituality, biomimicry, ennvironmental interconnectedness, string theory, nano-technology, and sexual proclivities.


The customer is very impressed and thinks, "This is really cool." He decides to test the robot. He walks out of the bar, turns around, and comes back in for another drink. Again, the robot serves him the perfectly prepared drink and asks him, "What's your IQ?"


The man responds, "about a 100". Immediately the robot starts talking, but this time, about football, NASCAR, baseball, supermodels, favorite fast food, guns and women's breasts.


Really impressed, the man leaves the bar and decides to give the robot one more test. He heads out and returns, the robot serves him and asks, "What's your IQ?" The man replies, "Er, 50, I think."


And the robot says... real slowly..."So........ya gonna vote for Bush again?"


:laugh:
 

Taggart

Diamond Member
Apr 23, 2001
4,384
0
0
The US was in debt up to its ears after WWII, in fact the amount of debt was greater if you allow for inflation.

Not that I am comparing the two. My point is that you can run up huge amounts of debt like this and be ok.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Taggart
The US was in debt up to its ears after WWII, in fact the amount of debt was greater if you allow for inflation.

Not that I am comparing the two. My point is that you can run up huge amounts of debt like this and be ok.
Oh, that ol' "deficits don't matter" thing?

Yes, they *do* matter.
 

Mursilis

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2001
7,756
11
81
Originally posted by: techs
So much for the Republicans becoming the new dominant party.
They control the Presdency and the Congress by borrowing huge amounts of money to essentially buy votes. And they only managed to squeek by in most elections. When the bill comes due it may very well signal a long term decline of the Republicans. It might take 30 years til anyone trusts them with the budget again.

And this is a perfect example of why this problem will never get solved - people refuse to rise above partisanship to address it. Democratically-controlled Congresses had a 20+ year history of passing unbalanced budgets prior to the GOP takeover of '94, so why has deficit spending just now become an issue with the Dems? I abandoned the GOP back in '92 over this issue - Ross Perot, nutty as he was, was the only candidate back then who even wanted to talk about the impact of chronic deficits. The only truth here is that both parties contributed to this mess and neither party has shown much interest in cleaning it up.
 

RightIsWrong

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2005
5,649
0
0
I think that they should place one of these in the biggest city of each state so that the populous can really see what their elected officials are doing for them and for the country. Or maybe I should have said....TO them and TO the country?

I'd be willing to bet that their would be drastic changes each voting cycle if it continued like it is now.
 

zendari

Banned
May 27, 2005
6,558
0
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Taggart
The US was in debt up to its ears after WWII, in fact the amount of debt was greater if you allow for inflation.

Not that I am comparing the two. My point is that you can run up huge amounts of debt like this and be ok.
Oh, that ol' "deficits don't matter" thing?

Yes, they *do* matter.

Nice 1 year old article. Wheres that recession all the liberals keep going on about?
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Taggart
The US was in debt up to its ears after WWII, in fact the amount of debt was greater if you allow for inflation.

Not that I am comparing the two. My point is that you can run up huge amounts of debt like this and be ok.
Oh, that ol' "deficits don't matter" thing?

Yes, they *do* matter.
Nice 1 year old article. Wheres that recession all the liberals keep going on about?
Try reading that article, zentroll. I know it's way above your 3rd-grade reading level but give it a try anyway.
 

Mursilis

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2001
7,756
11
81
Originally posted by: RightIsWrong
I think that they should place one of these in the biggest city of each state so that the populous can really see what their elected officials are doing for them and for the country. Or maybe I should have said....TO them and TO the country?

I'd be willing to bet that their would be drastic changes each voting cycle if it continued like it is now.

I think it's incorrect to think people even care; after all, do we reward the politician who cuts spending or raises taxes, or the opposite? People want deficits - maybe not explicitly, but in their voting patterns, they clearly reward the type of politics which creates them. It's going to take an extraordinary measure - Balanced Budget Amendment or something similar - to restore fiscal responsibility.
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,834
1
0
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Taggart
The US was in debt up to its ears after WWII, in fact the amount of debt was greater if you allow for inflation.

Not that I am comparing the two. My point is that you can run up huge amounts of debt like this and be ok.
Oh, that ol' "deficits don't matter" thing?

Yes, they *do* matter.

Nice 1 year old article. Wheres that recession all the liberals keep going on about?

Let's see, Bush has doubled the national debt since he took office and that's the best you got to defend him??? LMAO!!
 

fitzov

Platinum Member
Jan 3, 2004
2,477
0
0
Originally posted by: Taggart
The US was in debt up to its ears after WWII, in fact the amount of debt was greater if you allow for inflation.

Not that I am comparing the two. My point is that you can run up huge amounts of debt like this and be ok.


I came in just to see if someone actually said what you said.
 

zendari

Banned
May 27, 2005
6,558
0
0
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Taggart
The US was in debt up to its ears after WWII, in fact the amount of debt was greater if you allow for inflation.

Not that I am comparing the two. My point is that you can run up huge amounts of debt like this and be ok.
Oh, that ol' "deficits don't matter" thing?

Yes, they *do* matter.

Nice 1 year old article. Wheres that recession all the liberals keep going on about?

Let's see, Bush has doubled the national debt since he took office and that's the best you got to defend him??? LMAO!!

So like I said, where are the crushing effects this national debt is bringing on the economy?
 

jlbenedict

Banned
Jul 10, 2005
3,724
0
0
Isn't this the same administration that really pushed the new bankruptcy reform?

Seems kind of hypocritical to me
 

CptFarlow

Senior member
Apr 8, 2005
381
0
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
A man enters a bar and orders a drink. The bar has a robot bartender. The robot serves him a perfectly prepared cocktail, and then asks him, "What's your IQ?"


The man replies "150" and the robot proceeds to make conversation about global warning factors, quantum physics and spirituality, biomimicry, ennvironmental interconnectedness, string theory, nano-technology, and sexual proclivities.


The customer is very impressed and thinks, "This is really cool." He decides to test the robot. He walks out of the bar, turns around, and comes back in for another drink. Again, the robot serves him the perfectly prepared drink and asks him, "What's your IQ?"


The man responds, "about a 100". Immediately the robot starts talking, but this time, about football, NASCAR, baseball, supermodels, favorite fast food, guns and women's breasts.


Really impressed, the man leaves the bar and decides to give the robot one more test. He heads out and returns, the robot serves him and asks, "What's your IQ?" The man replies, "Er, 50, I think."


And the robot says... real slowly..."So........ya gonna vote for Bush again?"

:laugh:
 
Feb 16, 2005
13,979
5,203
136
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Taggart
The US was in debt up to its ears after WWII, in fact the amount of debt was greater if you allow for inflation.

Not that I am comparing the two. My point is that you can run up huge amounts of debt like this and be ok.
Oh, that ol' "deficits don't matter" thing?

Yes, they *do* matter.


Nice 1 year old article. Wheres that recession all the liberals keep going on about?

Let's see, Bush has doubled the national debt since he took office and that's the best you got to defend him??? LMAO!!

So like I said, where are the crushing effects this national debt is bringing on the economy?

You can't be that ignorant... Check out the split between classes now, it's wider than ever, and this little present the administration is cooking up will be served to generations yet to come.
 

zendari

Banned
May 27, 2005
6,558
0
0
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Taggart
The US was in debt up to its ears after WWII, in fact the amount of debt was greater if you allow for inflation.

Not that I am comparing the two. My point is that you can run up huge amounts of debt like this and be ok.
Oh, that ol' "deficits don't matter" thing?

Yes, they *do* matter.


Nice 1 year old article. Wheres that recession all the liberals keep going on about?

Let's see, Bush has doubled the national debt since he took office and that's the best you got to defend him??? LMAO!!

So like I said, where are the crushing effects this national debt is bringing on the economy?

You can't be that ignorant... Check out the split between classes now, it's wider than ever, and this little present the administration is cooking up will be served to generations yet to come.

Because nonsense like that is more important than our high gdp growth. Home ownernship is at a high, ill let you browse the rest of the facts yourself.

Just for fun, check out this:

Consumer Confidence Highest Since 2002
 

Darkhawk28

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2000
6,759
0
0
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Taggart
The US was in debt up to its ears after WWII, in fact the amount of debt was greater if you allow for inflation.

Not that I am comparing the two. My point is that you can run up huge amounts of debt like this and be ok.
Oh, that ol' "deficits don't matter" thing?

Yes, they *do* matter.


Nice 1 year old article. Wheres that recession all the liberals keep going on about?

Let's see, Bush has doubled the national debt since he took office and that's the best you got to defend him??? LMAO!!

So like I said, where are the crushing effects this national debt is bringing on the economy?

You can't be that ignorant... Check out the split between classes now, it's wider than ever, and this little present the administration is cooking up will be served to generations yet to come.

Because nonsense like that is more important than our high gdp growth. Home ownernship is at a high, ill let you browse the rest of the facts yourself.

Take our equity loans and our GDP is zilch. The economy is held up by more and more debt.
 

MonkeyK

Golden Member
May 27, 2001
1,396
8
81
Originally posted by: Taggart
The US was in debt up to its ears after WWII, in fact the amount of debt was greater if you allow for inflation.

Not that I am comparing the two. My point is that you can run up huge amounts of debt like this and be ok.

How high does it have to be before it is not OK?
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: zendari
Because nonsense like that is more important than our high gdp growth. Home ownernship is at a high, ill let you browse the rest of the facts yourself.

Take our equity loans and our GDP is zilch. The economy is held up by more and more debt.
Facts like that are lost on our ignorant youth.

But, for sh*ts and giggles:

GDP - Mortgage Equity Withdrawal
 
Feb 16, 2005
13,979
5,203
136
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Originally posted by: zendari
Because nonsense like that is more important than our high gdp growth. Home ownernship is at a high, ill let you browse the rest of the facts yourself.

Take our equity loans and our GDP is zilch. The economy is held up by more and more debt.
Facts like that are lost on our ignorant youth.

But, for sh*ts and giggles:

GDP - Mortgage Equity Withdrawal

Why would you want to muddy that view up with messy things like facts? zenny just doesn't get it. Then again... he would have voted for dumbya.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,894
46
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: fitzov
Originally posted by: Taggart
The US was in debt up to its ears after WWII, in fact the amount of debt was greater if you allow for inflation.

Not that I am comparing the two.

My point is that you can run up huge amounts of debt like this and be ok.

I came in just to see if someone actually said what you said.

Ah true Apologist's in black and white.

Hey Taggart, which Bridge did Bush and his buddies tell you to jump off?
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY