Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: conjur
My, my, my. Rather defensive all of a sudden, TLC. What's the matter? Your plan to follow in CsG's steps of obfuscation and ambiguity failing?
CsG? The only one I see failing so far in this thread is you. Your obvious dodging, weaving, and obfuscations are apparent to anyone who not thick as a brick.
BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA!! I'm not the one avoiding questions and changing the subject.
You know damn well you were referring to Iraq. That's what this thread is about.
The thread is about Iraq. But nowhere did I claim or even infer Iraq "attacked" the US as you poorly attempted to twist it. At this point, I'm rather dubious about you having any reading comprehension whatsoever.
Let's go to the tape again:
"And sitting around in a Clintonesque manner with our collective thumbs up our butts - and our cigars who knows where - was a complete failure and didn't prevent enemies from taking up arms against us on our very own soil."
Hmm...and you admitted this thread is about Iraq. So, you're claiming Iraq attacked us on our own soil. Where's the proof?[/quote]
I can't believe you're acting like such a hideous moron. I'm talking about Clinton too. Oh, but this thread is about Iraq. I suppose because I'm talking about Clinton that I'm claiming Clinton invaded the US as well?
Stop being a diversionary dumbass and playing idiotic word games.
At least I know how to spell it.
You figured out how to use a spell checker? Wow. You are so impressive. :roll:
No spell checker required. What's interesting, though, is you misspelled it right after I had used it. Hmm....
He did NOT pay money to terrorists. Go ahead, show me the proof.
If you haven't seen the proo0f, then you surely shoudln't be arguing about soemthing for which you are evidently clueless.
Learn something:
http://www.smh.com.au/articles...310.html?oneclick=true
From the headline itself, it disproves your argument:
The Iraqi leader's payments
to the families of dead Palestinian terrorists means more trouble for Yasser Arafat, writes Paul McGeough in the West Bank[/quote][/quote]
Another sad attempt of you trying to apologize for Saddam and the PLO and a weak efort to disassociate the homocide bombers from Saddams payment to terrorists. Figures, once again. Typical of "patriots" like you though. :roll:
Nice attempt at using a big word. Too bad it failed.
Maybe it's a big word to you. That I could understand completely.
No, it was a big word for you. That's why I mentioned that you failed in its use. It was too big for you.[/quote]
Good lord you act like a kindergardener. How old are you again?
Fess up to what? You know I'm right. The fact that you can't substantiate your claims is proof of that.
/watches conjur floating blissfully ignorant down that river that's not in Egypt.
You just disproved yourself! BWA HA HA HA HA[/quote]
In your own delusional mind.
*You* made the claim that Clinton did nothing. Go ahead, prove it.
It's been proven up here MANY times before that he did quite a bit.
What's the matter? Chicken?
More poor reading comprehension from you. It figures. Here's what I said about Clinton:
"And sitting around in a Clintonesque manner with our collective thumbs up our butts - and our cigars who knows where - was a complete failure and didn't prevent enemies from taking up arms against us on our very own soil. Yeah, that was a real sound strategy."
What did Clniton do besides bomb an aspirin factory in Sudan? He had OBL in his sights on several different occassion abd failed to take action. That failure to take the proper action (capturing or killing OBL) ended up costing us many lives.
Feel free to rebut that, con.
Go search the threads up here. There was one just a week or so ago. Shouldn't be too hard for you to find.
CsG must be proud of his underling.
People have been vacationed for less around here. For some reason though you won't be as it's apparent you're the teflon con.
Say what? You're following in his footsteps using the same fallacious logic. It's obvious you envy him.[/quote]
The rest of your replies are nothing but BS as well. You don't want to debate honestly because if you did you'd be beaten like the littel redheaded step-child you are. I have no interest in discussing anything with you anymore, little boy. When you can act like a man, please let everyone in ere know.
Thanks.