Bush signs do disappearing act

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
Bush signs do disappearing act in village

By KENT MALLETT
Advocate Reporter

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GRANVILLE -- The village is not enforcing its ban on erecting political signs more than 60 days before an election, but someone is selectively enforcing the ban anyway.

Some supporters of President George W. Bush claim their signs are disappearing from their yards, while signs for Democrat John Kerry are left untouched.

Courtney Bowman, 20, a Newark High School graduate and resident of Granville, said her parents have had signs stolen three times. She said they may put up a 4-by-8 sign, possibly covered in Super Glue, which will stick to the thieves.

"It's kind of frustrating," Bowman said. "I think it's really low that you can't have your own opinion. We're not hurting anybody else.

"I have no idea who's doing it, but it's starting to get a little suspicious. It's only the Bush signs (disappearing)."

Granville Police Chief Steve Cartnal said his department has received calls from residents of Burg Street and Bryn Du Drive reporting their Bush-Cheney signs had been stolen. They did not request police action, he said, but wanted the department to know about it.

No other signs have been reported taken, Cartnal said.

"It could be kids out there doing it," he said. "It could be who knows, but we're obviously keeping an eye on this type of activity."

Anyone caught taking the signs could face theft or trespassing charges, he said, or even ethics violations, which could be pursued by the Licking County Board of Elections or Ohio Secretary of State's Office.

Link


Union goons attempt to scare off Nader supporters:

"Nader's Oregon coordinator, Greg Kafoury, said one petition-gatherer was "badly shaken and intimidated" by two union members who knocked on her door and told her she was under investigation.

"We have been sabotaged and smeared, and now we have had our people bullied by people who knock on doors at night," Kafoury said. He said there is no intentional effort to turn in invalid signatures.

Kafoury said 30 of the campaign's 150 petition-carriers have quit because of the union's actions, but he said the Nader campaign still believes it will be able to meet Tuesday's deadline."
 

chrisms

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2003
6,615
0
0
Yes, Kerry and his tricksters sent their goons to Granville to steal Bush signs. Pure genius.
 

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
Kerry's supporters are just following their leaders attempt to silence anyone who is opposed to him.
 

chrisms

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2003
6,615
0
0
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Kerry's supporters are just following their leaders attempt to silence anyone who is opposed to him.

Well a more effective way to prove your point is to show actions Kerry himself has taken to silence "anyone who is opposed to him." Personally, I am not aware of any such occasions.
 

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
Some people care about the first ammendment right to free speech, unlike you and your candidate, John F. Kerry.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
A few overzealous supporters do not reflect John Kerry at all. That's like saying the genius idea of putting super glue on the signs so they'll stick to the theives is a reflection of Bush's stupidity.
 

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
Originally posted by: mugs
A few overzealous supporters do not reflect John Kerry at all. That's like saying the genius idea of putting super glue on the signs so they'll stick to the theives is a reflection of Bush's stupidity.

Like I said, it's all part of a pattern of behavior to silnece anyone who opposes John F. Kerry and tries to stand in the way of his blind ambition.
 

catnap1972

Platinum Member
Aug 10, 2000
2,607
0
76
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Some people care about the first ammendment right to free speech, unlike you and your candidate, John F. Kerry.

LOL talk about PKB

Must be why people at a Bush rally have to sign a loyalty oath (and any dissenters are immediately ejected and/or arrested)

(ROTFLMAO at your other reply as well)

:laugh:
 

Hossenfeffer

Diamond Member
Jul 16, 2000
7,462
1
0
All this warranted, imho, was a post within an established thread. Throw it into the thread about the Kerry campaign taking action against the book or something.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: mugs
A few overzealous supporters do not reflect John Kerry at all. That's like saying the genius idea of putting super glue on the signs so they'll stick to the theives is a reflection of Bush's stupidity.

Like I said, it's all part of a pattern of behavior to silnece anyone who opposes John F. Kerry and tries to stand in the way of his blind ambition.

No, it's a couple of local yokels who took it upon themselves to do something that John Kerry himself would not support. If you want to talk about silencing the opposition, let's discuss the loyalty oaths you have to sign to hear Cheney speak at a rally.
 

Todd33

Diamond Member
Oct 16, 2003
7,842
2
81
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Some people care about the first ammendment right to free speech, unlike you and your candidate, John F. Kerry.

Do you know how ridulous you sound? I think it's Bush who is making people get tickets, swear oaths and get searched before rallies.

Mr. Bush's advisers said they were girding for the most extensive street demonstrations at any political convention since the Democrats nominated Hubert H. Humphrey in Chicago in 1968. But in contrast to that convention, which was severely undermined by televised displays of street rioting, Republicans said they would seek to turn any disruptions to their advantage, by portraying protests by even independent activists as Democratic-sanctioned displays of disrespect for a sitting president.


http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/22/politics/campaign/22repubs.html

Who's trying to stop freedom of speech?
 

Ogi

Member
Jul 16, 2004
112
0
0
not to mention that Chaney is the biggest advocate of sensorship even though he will cuss out a senator on the senate floor .... yeah kerry doesn't believe in the 1st ammendment.

if you don't agree w/ bush you are either
1) a commie
2) a socialist
3) unpatriotic

yeah ...kerry is the one trying to take away 1st ammendment speaches.

man rip, your posts are sad and pathetic, i don't even bother clicking on your links because they are not worth my time ... you credability is that low.

Ogi
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: Riprorin

Like I said, it's all part of a pattern of behavior to silnece anyone who opposes John F. Kerry and tries to stand in the way of his blind ambition.

LOL - you are a true gem. By this logic, GeneralGrievous's racist comments were part of a systematic plan by the Bush campaign to extinguish minorities (after all, the campaign is responsible for the actions of every supporter, right?).
 

catnap1972

Platinum Member
Aug 10, 2000
2,607
0
76
Originally posted by: Ogi
not to mention that Chaney is the biggest advocate of sensorship even though he will cuss out a senator on the senate floor .... yeah kerry doesn't believe in the 1st ammendment.

if you don't agree w/ bush you are either
1) a commie
2) a socialist
3) unpatriotic

You forgot
4) a traitor
5) a terrorist
6) deserving of death
 

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Riprorin

Like I said, it's all part of a pattern of behavior to silnece anyone who opposes John F. Kerry and tries to stand in the way of his blind ambition.

LOL - you are a true gem. By this logic, GeneralGrievous's racist comments were part of a systematic plan by the Bush campaign to extinguish minorities (after all, the campaign is responsible for the actions of every supporter, right?).

Hey, Kerry's supporters are only following his lead. If you don't like the message, ban it or tear it down.
 

Cobalt

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2000
4,642
1
81
That's very low. Regardless of who you support, you should have your freedom to support your candidate. If the Bush supporter's signs are pulled, the Kerry supporter's signs should be pulled. I also think the "no XXXX 60 days before the election" is plain stupid and moronic.

EDIT: Oh and with Rips recent posts. I don't know if I should take him seriously anymore. His blindness and pure partisan beliefs are bewildering. If his candidate was a known pedophile/rapist/murder and had a cabinet full of children/women(men?)/people to kill I bet he would support him either way. Yes, maybe what I said is a little extreme. BUT JUST READ WHAT HE IS SAYING.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: Riprorin

Hey, Kerry's supporters are only following his lead. If you don't like the message, ban it or tear it down.

So you wouldn't have a problem if I put up a billboard in your neighborhood announcing your name and home address, which falsely said you were a known rapist and child molester? After all, it's free speech, right? Surely you wouldn't ask me to take it down, and impinge on my First Amendment rights?
 

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Riprorin

Hey, Kerry's supporters are only following his lead. If you don't like the message, ban it or tear it down.

So you wouldn't have a problem if I put up a billboard in your neighborhood announcing your name and home address, which falsely said you were a known rapist and child molester? After all, it's free speech, right? Surely you wouldn't ask me to take it down, and impinge on my First Amendment rights?

The Swiftvets allegations have been proved false?
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: Riprorin

The Swiftvets allegations have been proved false?

Between the fact that they are contradicted by William Rood, the Band of Brothers, and all available military records, including those prepared by the "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth" themselves, I'd say so, yes.

Since you're such a First Amendment guy, you won't mind my identifying you in your local paper as a convicted chicken-diddler and child pornographer, right? Again, I'm just exercising my right to free speech . . .
 

Ogi

Member
Jul 16, 2004
112
0
0
yes time and time again! jesus crist man as much as you post on here do you do much reading?

Ogi
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,041
136
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Riprorin

Hey, Kerry's supporters are only following his lead. If you don't like the message, ban it or tear it down.

So you wouldn't have a problem if I put up a billboard in your neighborhood announcing your name and home address, which falsely said you were a known rapist and child molester? After all, it's free speech, right? Surely you wouldn't ask me to take it down, and impinge on my First Amendment rights?

The Swiftvets allegations have been proved false?


Over and over again.
 

Ogi

Member
Jul 16, 2004
112
0
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Riprorin

The Swiftvets allegations have been proved false?

Between the fact that they are contradicted by William Rood, the Band of Brothers, and all available military records, including those prepared by the "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth" themselves, I'd say so, yes.

Since you're such a First Amendment guy, you won't mind my identifying you in your local paper as a convicted chicken-diddler and child pornographer, right? Again, I'm just exercising my right to free speech . . .

lol hot off the press

rip runs child pornography network!

wow ...this 1st ammendment stuff is so cool, i can say whatever i want about people i don't like and it's ok because i have the right to free speach!

Ogi