Originally posted by: privatebreyer
And withdrawing support for Arab dictatorships does what?
Note that "rejecting liberty" is term subject to interpretation. Its not intended to be an official policy shift, but a just a move to keep Arab leaders on there toes.
Originally posted by: prometheusxls
Originally posted by: privatebreyer
And withdrawing support for Arab dictatorships does what?
Note that "rejecting liberty" is term subject to interpretation. Its not intended to be an official policy shift, but a just a move to keep Arab leaders on there toes.
What is the term supposed to mean? Even Sadam was democraticly elected after alll... so liberty != democracy. I refuse to believe Bush broaching global regiemes issue. Is he just blowing sunshine up our sphincters?
Originally posted by: prometheusxls
Originally posted by: privatebreyer
And withdrawing support for Arab dictatorships does what?
Note that "rejecting liberty" is term subject to interpretation. Its not intended to be an official policy shift, but a just a move to keep Arab leaders on there toes.
What is the term supposed to mean? Even Sadam was democraticly elected after alll... so liberty != democracy. I refuse to believe Bush broaching global regiemes issue. Is he just blowing sunshine up our sphincters?
In other words, Bush is changing his story on his invasion once again, still looking for an angle he can sell to America. He'll keep throwing out one sorry excuse after another until one finally sticks.Originally posted by: AAman
this speech had next to nothing to do with changing the Arab governments, or the 'War on Terror'-
Bush is trying to deflect the mounting criticism, rising even in his own party, that Iraq had nothing to do with
terrorism or weapons of mass destruction, and has not had an effect toward liberty in the muslim and Arab worlds.
Expect bombast and rhetoric, but ZERO substance. After all, there is no 'War on Terror' or oil without the
assistance of these same governments, governments that the U.S., and in particular Republican administrations
have gone out of their way to pacify and befriend.
Originally posted by: GrGr
Mao and Mussolini had excellent careers as demagogues without moustaches.
Originally posted by: Pennstate
If Bush has the policy and the determination to follow through with his statement, then I support him on THIS issue all the way. As liberal as I am, I still believe the respect that the US enjoyed prior to the 80's was earned from our sacrifices made in WWII and WWI. Back in those days, we fought wars for the RIGHT reasons. Ever since, our militray objective has been hijacked by ideological and big business interests. The duty of a soldier is not to show that he can kick everybody's ass, but to be willing to sacrifice his life to defend the defenseless. Whether you support this concept or not, you have to agree that if there's any country in the world that can force out an evil dictatorship, it's the US.
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Well it's been 1,000 years and the middle east is just getting worse. I suppose you'd cheer for a President who simply ignored the area and left it for someone else sometime else to deal with. Oh wait...you did...and then a pair of planes hit the WTC.
He probably won't be able to affect anything over there. It's not like they could hate us more or anything and they won't be changing anytime soon. But I applaud his will to try. If you were President of the United States what would you do with your power? Save the environment? End terrorism? Fool around with interns? Not many people will ever get that chance and I can't see how you could criticize somebody for trying to enact positive change.
Bush had gentler admonitions for Egypt, Saudi Arabia and particularly China, whose citizens, he said, will "insist on controlling their own lives."
When Iranians and Syrians get sick of his bs and pour into Iraq and butcher the US occupational forces there, then maybe bush would see reality.
Bush Says 'Will no Longer Support Arab States That Reject Liberty !"
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Bush Says 'Will no Longer Support Arab States That Reject Liberty !"
Umm, so basically he is saying in more friendly terms that Arab's states suck and he doesn't support any of them?
Originally posted by: GrGr
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Bush Says 'Will no Longer Support Arab States That Reject Liberty !"
Umm, so basically he is saying in more friendly terms that Arab's states suck and he doesn't support any of them?
No, "To Reject Liberty" is a eupheism for "refuse to follow orders". Bush is basically saying "Do what I tell you to do or else".