Bush quietly moves to replace archivist of the United States...

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
http://gcn.com/vol1_no1/daily-updates/25635-1.html

Bush's choice to replace Carlin raises concerns

By Jason Miller
GCN Staff

After almost nine years as archivist of the United States, John Carlin will step down as soon as the Senate confirms Allen Weinstein, President Bush?s choice to become the ninth archivist.

Carlin announced his intent to resign as head of the National Archives and Records Administration this winter in a letter to Bush. The president has said he wants Weinstein to take the NARA post but he has not sent the nomination officially to the Senate.

Weinstein is senior adviser for democratic institutions and director of the Center for Democratic Initiatives at the International Foundation for Elections Systems in Washington. He previously was president of the Center for Democracy in Washington. He earned his bachelor's degree from City College of New York and a master's and doctorate from Yale University.

The Society of American Archivists has expressed concern about Weinstein?s nomination.

?Prior to the announcement, there was no consultation with professional organizations of archivists or historians,? the Chicago association noted in a statement this month. ?This is the first time since the National Archives and Records Administration was established as an independent agency that the process of nominating an archivist of the United States has not been open for public discussion and input.?

Carlin said he would stay on as archivist until his replacement is confirmed.

?In June, I will complete my ninth year as archivist and with the completion of a major initiative this fall, I believe it will be time for me to look for other opportunities,? he said. ?Upon taking the position in June 1995, I made a commitment to our staff and stakeholders to remain at NARA long enough to see its transition from an agency primarily focused on paper records to one positioned to deal with the challenges posed by the electronic records now being created by our government. At the time I estimated that such a transition would take eight to 10 years.?

Under Carlin, NARA is leading the Electronic Records Management e-government project and the Electronic Records Archives project.

For the Quicksilver records management project, NARA has established guidance to transfer e-mail records, permanent scanned text and Adobe Portable Document Format documents, and digital photography records.

For ERA, the agency released a request for proposals in December for a system to preserve and make accessible digital government records long after the hardware and software used to create them has been replaced. NARA plans to award the ERA contract this summer.

Carlin said the administration supported NARA?s work in preserving records.

?We have not only made progress in using new technologies to preserve government records, but also in making our invaluable documentary resources more widely available to the American people,? he said.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Carlin said the administration supported NARA?s work in preserving records.

?We have not only made progress in using new technologies to preserve government records, but also in making our invaluable documentary resources more widely available to the American people,? he said.

Meh - selective reading again conjur? - you're almost becoming almost as bad as dave...

CkG
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Your point, CkG?

You refute the secrecy of the administration to not make the selection process public as has been the procedure in the past?
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
1. Your thread title, like most of your posts, is sh!t. How does one "secretly" send a nomination to the Senate? How much fanfare does this nomination get/deserve?

2. Where in the article does it say Weinstein "raises concerns". I see where they are whining that no one consulted them but no where does it say they are concerned about Weinstein. Care to point it out or shall we just lump you in with dmcowen?
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: conjur
Your point, CkG?

You refute the secrecy of the administration to not make the selection process public as has been the procedure in the past?

Your premise is more "secrecy" which is just more of the same tired BS spewed by the left. It's just a nomonation for cripse sakes. You people need to losen your tinfoil...

CkG
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
?Prior to the announcement, there was no consultation with professional organizations of archivists or historians,? the Chicago association noted in a statement this month. ?This is the first time since the National Archives and Records Administration was established as an independent agency that the process of nominating an archivist of the United States has not been open for public discussion and input.?

The nominee was selected in secret...not in public.

How difficult is that for the Bush-God fanboys to understand? :roll:
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: conjur
?Prior to the announcement, there was no consultation with professional organizations of archivists or historians,? the Chicago association noted in a statement this month. ?This is the first time since the National Archives and Records Administration was established as an independent agency that the process of nominating an archivist of the United States has not been open for public discussion and input.?

The nominee was selected in secret...not in public.

How difficult is that for the Bush-God fanboys to understand? :roll:

Who picks nominees? Who sends them to Congress? Oh... that's right...the President does.

:roll:

CkG
 

nutxo

Diamond Member
May 20, 2001
6,834
515
126
Originally posted by: conjur
?Prior to the announcement, there was no consultation with professional organizations of archivists or historians,? the Chicago association noted in a statement this month. ?This is the first time since the National Archives and Records Administration was established as an independent agency that the process of nominating an archivist of the United States has not been open for public discussion and input.?

The nominee was selected in secret...not in public.

How difficult is that for the Bush-God fanboys to understand? :roll:

So whenever you dream up these conspiracies do you play the theme from twighlight zone or does it play in your head?

 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
I repeat:


Originally posted by: conjur
?Prior to the announcement, there was no consultation with professional organizations of archivists or historians,? the Chicago association noted in a statement this month. ?This is the first time since the National Archives and Records Administration was established as an independent agency that the process of nominating an archivist of the United States has not been open for public discussion and input.?

The nominee was selected in secret...not in public.

How difficult is that for the Bush-God fanboys to understand? :roll:

 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: conjur
I repeat:


Originally posted by: conjur
?Prior to the announcement, there was no consultation with professional organizations of archivists or historians,? the Chicago association noted in a statement this month. ?This is the first time since the National Archives and Records Administration was established as an independent agency that the process of nominating an archivist of the United States has not been open for public discussion and input.?

The nominee was selected in secret...not in public.

How difficult is that for the Bush-God fanboys to understand? :roll:

Who picks nominees? Who sends them to Congress? Oh... that's right...the President does.

Oh, and what's next? A post about how Bush closes the door to the bathroom to pee in "secret"? :roll:

CkG
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: conjur
I repeat:


Originally posted by: conjur
?Prior to the announcement, there was no consultation with professional organizations of archivists or historians,? the Chicago association noted in a statement this month. ?This is the first time since the National Archives and Records Administration was established as an independent agency that the process of nominating an archivist of the United States has not been open for public discussion and input.?

The nominee was selected in secret...not in public.

How difficult is that for the Bush-God fanboys to understand? :roll:

Who picks nominees? Who sends them to Congress? Oh... that's right...the President does.

Oh, and what's next? A post about how Bush closes the door to the bathroom to pee in "secret"? :roll:

CkG

I'll give him that much, this way he won't be caught with his pants down with a Monica, he just does it with garbage spewing from his mouth.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/20/politics/20ARCH.html

Mr. Bush nominated Mr. Weinstein on April 8, but the announcement drew little notice until historians, researchers and archivists began complaining about it. Nine groups, including the Society of American Archivists, have raised concerns about the selection, complaining that the White House did not consult them.

"It's the equivalent of the administration's thumbing its nose at the nation's history," said Timothy A. Slavin, president of the Council of State Historical Records Coordinators. He added, "It seems to me that they were trying to bum-rush an appointment."

 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: conjur
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/20/politics/20ARCH.html

Mr. Bush nominated Mr. Weinstein on April 8, but the announcement drew little notice until historians, researchers and archivists began complaining about it. Nine groups, including the Society of American Archivists, have raised concerns about the selection, complaining that the White House did not consult them.

"It's the equivalent of the administration's thumbing its nose at the nation's history," said Timothy A. Slavin, president of the Council of State Historical Records Coordinators. He added, "It seems to me that they were trying to bum-rush an appointment."

Ah, so it wasn't "secret" then - people just didn't notice. Figured as much.

CkG
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: conjur
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/20/politics/20ARCH.html

Mr. Bush nominated Mr. Weinstein on April 8, but the announcement drew little notice until historians, researchers and archivists began complaining about it. Nine groups, including the Society of American Archivists, have raised concerns about the selection, complaining that the White House did not consult them.

"It's the equivalent of the administration's thumbing its nose at the nation's history," said Timothy A. Slavin, president of the Council of State Historical Records Coordinators. He added, "It seems to me that they were trying to bum-rush an appointment."

Hey Conjur,

Kathy Cox was on the Radio today. She is fielding questions because the Third Graders are taking a Test now that determines if they go on to 4th grade or get left back.

She said she learned a lot with the Evolution issue but she still feels schools should teach God in school and not the Monkey's to Man thingy.
 

heartsurgeon

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2001
4,260
0
0
I can see the headline in the NYT's now..

Bush goes to bathroom "behind closed doors", does not consult with Liberals first. Flushes, "leaving no permanent record" which can be review by outside commission. Dems claim b.m's. not covered by executive priviledge. Contents of b.m. belong to "the people". Declare Bush bathroom habits "the most secretive of any administration in recent history".

give me a freakin break.
the libs are gonna contest every single appointment no matter what.
archivist?
who even knew there was such a position.
who really cares?

 

nutxo

Diamond Member
May 20, 2001
6,834
515
126
Originally posted by: conjur
I repeat:


Originally posted by: conjur
?Prior to the announcement, there was no consultation with professional organizations of archivists or historians,? the Chicago association noted in a statement this month. ?This is the first time since the National Archives and Records Administration was established as an independent agency that the process of nominating an archivist of the United States has not been open for public discussion and input.?

The nominee was selected in secret...not in public.

How difficult is that for the Bush-God fanboys to understand? :roll:

Where does it say it was a secret? Boy, kerrys fairies are goin off the deep end.