• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Bush: Iran armed with a nuke poses 'great threat'

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: MisterJackson
Can't we all just get along?!?!?

Let's hold hands and sing in harmony......"I'd like to buy the world a coke, and make it....". Come on now, sing along!!!!!
oddly, your analogy works. you only bought the world one Coke. now all we have left to do is fight over who gets it! 😛
 
Originally posted by: jspeicher
(CNN) -- President Bush, in a joint appearance with German Chancellor Angela Merkel at the White House on Friday, said that Iran "armed with a nuclear weapon, poses a great threat to the security of the world."

Here we go again.
how is this not a political thread? :|

take this BS to P&N where there is more intelligence :roll:
"Non-P&N Discussion. Lesser intelligence required."

 
Originally posted by: paulney
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: JS80
99% Iran will use nuke to destroy Israel.
Israel will die before it let's Iran get a nuke.

Why would Iran commit suicide? Pakistan has pretty much the same opinion of Israel as Iran yet no war there. Nuclear weapons are pretty much deterence only.

Because Pakistan has a neighboring India waving its nukes at it on a regular basis.
They have a much bigger problem at hand, than worry about Israel.

Read a book, its the other way around, India is a democracy not a terrorist funding Islamic state.

Oh and all the retards calling for P and N.

You should know this, its more important than all the other 'my penis looks wierd' and 'my imaginary girlfriend dumped me' threads that litter the place.
 
"I know not what weapons will be used in WWIII, but WWIV will be fought with sticks and stones." -Albert Einstein

I may not have it exact (the quote), but I wonder if we'll be alive before/after WWIII!
 
Originally posted by: Proletariat

Read a book, its the other way around, India is a democracy not a terrorist funding Islamic state.

India's democracy doesn't mean jack in dispute over Cahsmere with Pakistan.
Oh, and for the record: India was the first to conduct three underground nuclear tests and then two more. Which prompted Pakistan to respond.

:roll:
 
Originally posted by: Proletariat
You should know this, its more important than all the other 'my penis looks wierd' and 'my imaginary girlfriend dumped me' threads that litter the place.
lol, i must have missed the "my penis looks wierd" thread. hehe
 
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: paulney
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: JS80
99% Iran will use nuke to destroy Israel.
Israel will die before it let's Iran get a nuke.

Why would Iran commit suicide? Pakistan has pretty much the same opinion of Israel as Iran yet no war there. Nuclear weapons are pretty much deterence only.

Because Pakistan has a neighboring India waving its nukes at it on a regular basis.
They have a much bigger problem at hand, than worry about Israel.

Read a book, its the other way around, India is a democracy not a terrorist funding Islamic state.

Oh and all the retards calling for P and N.

You should know this, its more important than all the other 'my penis looks wierd' and 'my imaginary girlfriend dumped me' threads that litter the place.
you lost me at "all the retards" :roll:

look, this is OT. there is a political forum for a reason.

now link that "my penis looks weird" thread for me stat! :laugh:

 
Originally posted by: paulney
Originally posted by: Proletariat

Read a book, its the other way around, India is a democracy not a terrorist funding Islamic state.

India's democracy doesn't mean jack in dispute over Cahsmere with Pakistan.
Oh, and for the record: India was the first to conduct three underground nuclear tests and then two more. Which prompted Pakistan to respond.

:roll:

You can't even spell Kashmir right.

Next.
 
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: paulney
Originally posted by: Proletariat

Read a book, its the other way around, India is a democracy not a terrorist funding Islamic state.

India's democracy doesn't mean jack in dispute over Cahsmere with Pakistan.
Oh, and for the record: India was the first to conduct three underground nuclear tests and then two more. Which prompted Pakistan to respond.

:roll:

You can't even spell Kashmir right.

Next.

That's all you can come up with?
Go educate yourself on the history of nuclear arms in both countries first.

 
Originally posted by: paulney
Originally posted by: Proletariat
Originally posted by: paulney
Originally posted by: Proletariat

Read a book, its the other way around, India is a democracy not a terrorist funding Islamic state.

India's democracy doesn't mean jack in dispute over Cahsmere with Pakistan.
Oh, and for the record: India was the first to conduct three underground nuclear tests and then two more. Which prompted Pakistan to respond.

:roll:

You can't even spell Kashmir right.

Next.

That's all you can come up with?
Go educate yourself on the history of nuclear arms in both countries first.

Take it to PM, this has nothing to do with the thread. And learn to spell.
 
Originally posted by: paulney
Originally posted by: CPA
Originally posted by: gopunk
lets hurry up and replace oil as a source of energy... then we won't have to deal with this crap anymore

yes we will. The religious war has nothing to do with oil.

In fact, Iran's been saying that their use of plutonium is for energy purposes (ie, to replace oil and coal).

That is so ludicious, it's not even funny.

The world's natural reserve of uranium and other radioactive elements is so miniscule compared to the reserve of fossils (coal and oil), that it's a _lot_ harder and more expensive to produce energy from nuclear sources than the traditional way. Especially for Iran who's sitting on one of the largest oil reserves in the world.

Sure, they may use uranium to power the reactor in 'scientific purposes', but who can gurantee they will not try to enrich it and convert to plutonium? The amount of uranium they will have to import and deal with after it's been used is so economically unsound, it's clear energy is not what they are looking for.

Hey, I'm just posting what they said, I'm not saying I agree with them. And thanks for clarifying the uranium/plutonium thing, I'm not much of a chemist.
 
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Originally posted by: Proletariat
You should know this, its more important than all the other 'my penis looks wierd' and 'my imaginary girlfriend dumped me' threads that litter the place.
lol, i must have missed the "my penis looks wierd" thread. hehe


I'm glad I missed the "My penis looks wierd" thread.
 
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Originally posted by: Proletariat
You should know this, its more important than all the other 'my penis looks wierd' and 'my imaginary girlfriend dumped me' threads that litter the place.
lol, i must have missed the "my penis looks wierd" thread. hehe


I'm glad I missed the "My penis looks wierd" thread.
suuuuuuuure...
 
Back
Top