Bush Dedicates WWII Memorial -- He should have stayed away

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: Crimson
InfoPigeons argument strategy:

1. Post a link to an article.

2. Make inflamatory statements about Bush.

3. Deny making inflamatory statements about Bush. He really likes Bush.

4. Makes more imflamatory statements about Bush.

5. Asks people to stop saying he doesn't like Bush, even those everything he says is negative and inflamatory.

6. Tells people arguing against them they are making logical falacies, tossing in some more inflamatory statements about Bush while denying he hates him.

7. Insult all people who disgree with him, claiming they are all making logical falacies in their arguments.

8. Claim he didn't insult anyone, and insult them again while doing so.

9. Ask for proof of him hating Bush, while providing no proof of his inflamatory claims against Bush.

10. All the conservatives get tired of his hatred and just move on.

11. He thinks he won.

:beer:

CkG
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: Infohawk
The CNN Story

Bush shouldn't be dragging this memorial through his mud. His war is a farce. WW2 wasn't. He hands are stained with blood and he should have done the right thing and let Bob Dole and others dedicate the memorial.

Your opinion does not represent anything but an anonymous intarweb opinion. Bush did not drag the dedication of the Memorial through the mud. The Iraq war wasn't a farce - just as WWII wasn't. His hands aren't stained, and he did the right thing by attending and speaking at the dedication of the Memorial.

CkG

Thats what I wanted to say but the ignore thing will work also..

;)


If you would like to imitate Cad's style in his last post (which is very different from his other posts), it's not too hard. Just take what the person originally said and put each sentence in negative form without offering reasons for the denial. It's not the worst kind of post since it makes the other person give reasons for their assertions-- which I am and was more than happy to do.
 

tallest1

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2001
3,474
0
0
Originally posted by: tallest1
Is this the first time Bush has stood in front of a microphone and NOT mentioned Iraq? Of course he doesn't bother mentioning Bin Laden anymore but for him to understand that he can talk about WWII without bringing in current wars is impressive

I stand corrected. Hes doing a live speech right now comparing WWII to the War on Iraq :|