Stoneburner
Diamond Member
- May 29, 2003
- 3,491
- 0
- 76
Mccain will be angry. If bushy turns this into an Obama v. Bush campaign, mccain will get fuxored in his nasal cavities.
What an idiot.
What an idiot.
Originally posted by: Stoneburner
Mccain will be angry. If bushy turns this into an Obama v. Bush campaign, mccain will get fuxored in his nasal cavities.
What an idiot.
Did you bother to read what Bush actually said?Originally posted by: Foxery
A guy with his reputation and approval ratings trying to slander the Democrats is nothing but great news for Democrats! Let's hope he does more.
One things for certain, since Bush has been President we have been more of a threat to peace in the ME than Iran.Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
But at least Bush is smart enough to realize and publically state that Iran is a real threat to ME peace.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
One things for certain, since Bush has been President we have been more of a threat to peace in the ME than Iran.Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
But at least Bush is smart enough to realize and publically state that Iran is a real threat to ME peace.
Right...I'm sure that the Dems will fix it all shortly when they take the White House....like Carter and Clinton did.Originally posted by: Red Dawn
One things for certain, since Bush has been President we have been more of a threat to peace in the ME than Iran.Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
But at least Bush is smart enough to realize and publically state that Iran is a real threat to ME peace.
At least we would have a moral ground to stand on unlike now.Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Right...I'm sure that the Dems will fix it all shortly when they take the White House....like Carter did.Originally posted by: Red Dawn
One things for certain, since Bush has been President we have been more of a threat to peace in the ME than Iran.Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
But at least Bush is smart enough to realize and publically state that Iran is a real threat to ME peace.
So I guess we would all feel better knowing we had the "moral high ground" the day after Iran nukes Israel or vice versa. Somehow that strikes me as very sad...I will find no comfort in that and hope you wouldn't either.Originally posted by: Red Dawn
At least we would have a moral ground to stand on unlike now.Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Right...I'm sure that the Dems will fix it all shortly when they take the White House....like Carter did.Originally posted by: Red Dawn
One things for certain, since Bush has been President we have been more of a threat to peace in the ME than Iran.Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
But at least Bush is smart enough to realize and publically state that Iran is a real threat to ME peace.
So you are now equating Israel with Iran. Interesting.Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
So I guess we would all feel better knowing we had the "moral high ground" the day after Iran nukes Israel or vice versa. Somehow that strikes me as very sad...I will find no comfort in that and hope you wouldn't either.Originally posted by: Red Dawn
At least we would have a moral ground to stand on unlike now.Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Right...I'm sure that the Dems will fix it all shortly when they take the White House....like Carter did.Originally posted by: Red Dawn
One things for certain, since Bush has been President we have been more of a threat to peace in the ME than Iran.Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
But at least Bush is smart enough to realize and publically state that Iran is a real threat to ME peace.
Perhaps you can be more specific...what do you find so interesting?Originally posted by: Red Dawn
So you are now equating Israel with Iran. Interesting.Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
So I guess we would all feel better knowing we had the "moral high ground" the day after Iran nukes Israel or vice versa. Somehow that strikes me as very sad...I will find no comfort in that and hope you wouldn't either.Originally posted by: Red Dawn
At least we would have a moral ground to stand on unlike now.Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Right...I'm sure that the Dems will fix it all shortly when they take the White House....like Carter did.Originally posted by: Red Dawn
One things for certain, since Bush has been President we have been more of a threat to peace in the ME than Iran.Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
But at least Bush is smart enough to realize and publically state that Iran is a real threat to ME peace.
Originally posted by: naddicott
I really don't see how talking, or agreeing to talk, with an enemy is suddenly equivalent to "appeasement".
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
So I guess we would all feel better knowing we had the "moral high ground" the day after Iran nukes Israel or vice versa. Somehow that strikes me as very sad...I will find no comfort in that and hope you wouldn't either.
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Gotta agree, for once, with Dubya on this one. His approach has been flawless. Terrorism has become a thing of the past since his great successes in the ME :thumbsup:Originally posted by: sportage
CNN
JERUSALEM (CNN) ? In a particularly sharp blast from halfway around the world, President Bush suggested Thursday that Sen. Barack Obama and other Democrats are in favor of "appeasement" of terrorists in the same way U.S. leaders appeased Nazis in the run-up to World War II.
This is going to be a VERY dirty election! What has Bush got to lose?
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Joe Lieberman hit the nail right on the head when he said ?President Bush got it exactly right today when he warned about the threat of Iran and its terrorist proxies like Hamas and Hezbollah. It is imperative that we reject the flawed and naïve thinking that denies or dismisses the words of extremists and terrorists when they shout ?Death to America? and ?Death to Israel,? and that holds that? if only we were to sit down and negotiate with these killers ? they would cease to threaten us. It is critical to our national security that our commander-in-chief is able to distinguish between America?s friends and America?s enemies, and not confuse the two.?
I'm no Bush fan but I'm definitely not a BDS guy either. But at least Bush is smart enough to realize and publically state that Iran is a real threat to ME peace...to actually believe that diplomacy will magically solved this problem is truly "flawed and naive" thinking. Diplomacy is a tool that's proven ineffective in this case...what do we do...keep banging away hoping for a different result? Dems for some reason seem to think that they're incredibly good diplomats and can be much more effective. I'm still waiting for Pelosi's and Carter's visits to pay off....yawn...still waiting.
4. Obama also said that he would not rule out surgical strikes so he is not just talking about negotiating in blind faith and has left military options open.U.S. Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) and U.S. Representatives Barney Frank (D-MA) and Tom Lantos (D-CA) today introduced the Iran Sanctions Enabling Act of 2007, which empowers Americans to apply economic pressure on the Iranian regime by establishing a federal list of entities that invest in Iran and allowing for divestment. As Iran continues to threaten regional stability and international security by pursuing a nuclear program, rattling sabers at its neighbors ? especially Israel ? and supporting terrorist groups funded by its energy sector, this bill will enable investors and state and local governments to ensure they are not invested in companies that support Iran?s oil and gas industry.
IMO...judging from their extremist rhetoric...yes.Originally posted by: Jebeelzabub
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
So I guess we would all feel better knowing we had the "moral high ground" the day after Iran nukes Israel or vice versa. Somehow that strikes me as very sad...I will find no comfort in that and hope you wouldn't either.
Why in the world would Iran, providing they even had nuclear weapons, use them on Israel? This makes no sense whatsoever, especially considering that the Israeli's have advanced counterstrike capabilities that guarantee any attacker using nuclear weapons would suffer a counterattack an order of magnitude worse.
Essentially, you attack Israel, your entire country ceases to exist, and untold millions of your citizens would die. Why would Iran do this? Are you saying they're so irrational that they'd willingly sacrifice their entire country to attempt to destroy Israel?
Jebeelzabub
Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
So I guess we would all feel better knowing we had the "moral high ground" the day after Iran nukes Israel or vice versa. Somehow that strikes me as very sad...I will find no comfort in that and hope you wouldn't either.Originally posted by: Red Dawn
At least we would have a moral ground to stand on unlike now.Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
Right...I'm sure that the Dems will fix it all shortly when they take the White House....like Carter did.Originally posted by: Red Dawn
One things for certain, since Bush has been President we have been more of a threat to peace in the ME than Iran.Originally posted by: Doc Savage Fan
But at least Bush is smart enough to realize and publically state that Iran is a real threat to ME peace.
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Did you bother to read what Bush actually said?Originally posted by: Foxery
A guy with his reputation and approval ratings trying to slander the Democrats is nothing but great news for Democrats! Let's hope he does more.
He didn't mention any one by name but was talking in general. This speech is similar to ones he has been making for years. And it is an argument that people have been making for decades as well.
Go back to Reagan and his answer when asked about the Soviet Union.
"We win, the lose"
When everyone else wanted to talk to the Soviets and accepted the Soviet Union as a permanent part of the world Reagan went against that few and created a plan to confront and challenge the Soviet Union. And look at what happened...