Burris takes victory lap at City Hall

Status
Not open for further replies.

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
http://newsblogs.chicagotribun...1/burris-takes-vi.html

Waiting to be sworn in later this week as the new junior senator from Illinois, Roland Burris spent an hour today at City Hall soaking in praise from aldermen and Mayor Richard Daley.

The City Council approved a resolution lauding Burris for having "the intelligence, character and reason that are the attributes of a great leader."

"I am speechless, honestly. I am just moved by the actions of this great City Council body and the comments from all the aldermen and the mayor. It's just wonderful," Burris said.

Several aldermen bemoaned that senators did not seat Burris immediately after Gov. Rod Blagojevich appointed him to finish President-elect Barack Obama's Senate term.

"He should have been seated without question," Ald. Ed Smith (28th) said.

Ald. Robert Fioretti (2nd) said he supported holding a special election to fill the Obama vacancy but added, "There has never, ever been a challenge to Roland Burris' integrity."

Burris said the ordeal has been "an experience---something that helped me grow and to learn and to be a better senator."

Burris and Senate officials still are working on the details of his seating, but Burris said he hopes to be sworn in at 2 p.m. Thursday.

He declined to say if he would run for a full term in 2010 but brushed off questions that he could not raise funds for a statewide campaign.

"I wish you all could see what's come into my home and into my office," Burris told reporters. "There are calls coming in even from Europe, encouraging me. From the state of Maine, from the state of Washington, from the state of Texas, from the state of Florida. Calls coming in, saying, 'Roland, whatever we can do.' "

Burris also said he had no problem with being lampooned on "Saturday Night Live": "Wasn't that great?"

Ald. Freddrenna Lyle (6th) originally planned to push a resolution calling on the Senate to seat Burris. The resolution, however, became moot when the Senate on Monday agreed to admit Burris.

"You bring another perspective because you are not a millionaire," said Lyle, who is Burris' alderman.

Ald. Anthony Beale (9th) said Burris has integrity and is a role model for him.

"That was the best pick (Blagojevich) could have possibly made ... to untaint the process," Beale said. Federal prosecutors charged Blagojevich with trying to sell the Senate seat to benefit himself and his family.



Say one thing, mean another. Welcome to the new Democratic majority, caving to the radicals at the CBC.

Looks like Harry Reid and Obama have already lost control of their minions.
 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
Did they *want* to seat him considering the fiasco surrounding the Illinois governor? No. However, there is no legal reason (yet) as to why he should not be seated. Perhaps that will come in due time. Blago is still the legitimage governor of Illinois with the full powers, rights, and responsibilities associated with that. Hopefully that will not last long. If Burris has done anything wrong or unethical prior to being appointed, then the Senate will expell him as they rightfully should. I see no problem here, yet.
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Did they *want* to seat him considering the fiasco surrounding the Illinois governor? No. However, there is no legal reason (yet) as to why he should not be seated. Perhaps that will come in due time. Blago is still the legitimage governor of Illinois with the full powers, rights, and responsibilities associated with that. Hopefully that will not last long. If Burris has done anything wrong or unethical prior to being appointed, then the Senate will expell him as they rightfully should. I see no problem here, yet.

50 Democratic Senators provided tons of reasons just a couple weeks back.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Burris and Blagojevich played their hands well. Obama and everyone else played their hands poorly.
 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Did they *want* to seat him considering the fiasco surrounding the Illinois governor? No. However, there is no legal reason (yet) as to why he should not be seated. Perhaps that will come in due time. Blago is still the legitimage governor of Illinois with the full powers, rights, and responsibilities associated with that. Hopefully that will not last long. If Burris has done anything wrong or unethical prior to being appointed, then the Senate will expell him as they rightfully should. I see no problem here, yet.

50 Democratic Senators provided tons of reasons just a couple weeks back.

Such as? Look, I know they all said that seating Burris was something nobody wanted considering the scandal surrounding that. However, unless they have a specific legal reason to bar him such as not having paperwork in order, not meeting constitutional requirements (residency, age, etc.), or not being properly appointed (i.e. if the Illinois governor had been stripped of the appointment power), etc., they could do nothing. Congress can, however, expell him if he violates their rules set forth by the Senate itself. That has nothing to do with seating him to begin with.
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Originally posted by: winnar111
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Did they *want* to seat him considering the fiasco surrounding the Illinois governor? No. However, there is no legal reason (yet) as to why he should not be seated. Perhaps that will come in due time. Blago is still the legitimage governor of Illinois with the full powers, rights, and responsibilities associated with that. Hopefully that will not last long. If Burris has done anything wrong or unethical prior to being appointed, then the Senate will expell him as they rightfully should. I see no problem here, yet.

50 Democratic Senators provided tons of reasons just a couple weeks back.

Such as? Look, I know they all said that seating Burris was something nobody wanted considering the scandal surrounding that. However, unless they have a specific legal reason to bar him such as not having paperwork in order, not meeting constitutional requirements (residency, age, etc.), or not being properly appointed (i.e. if the Illinois governor had been stripped of the appointment power), etc., they could do nothing. Congress can, however, expell him if he violates their rules set forth by the Senate itself. That has nothing to do with seating him to begin with.

http://www.progressillinois.co...durbin-burris-response

DURBIN: What I'm about to say is not a reflection on Roland Burris. I've known him for many years. I've worked with him when he was our state comptroller and state attorney general. He has a long record of public service in the State of Illinois. But it was a mistake today for Gov. Blagojevich to try to appoint Roland Burris to fill the Senate vacancy. It is an act of political defiance.

On September the 10th, the Senate Democratic Caucus -- all 50 Senate Democrats in Washington -- sent a letter to Gov. Blagojevich making it clear that we will not seat his appointment to fill this vacancy. The reason is obvious. Because of the criminal complaint pending against him, arguing that he is guilty of corruption in filling this seat, because of his pending impeachment hearings, the fact that the evidence against him is in his own voice and his own words, it is clear that Rod Blagojevich has forfeited his moral authority to fill this vacancy.

There's only one step he can take now, for this state and to make sure this Senate seat is filled in the proper way: Step aside as the governor of this state. Allow the lieutenant governor to assume his constitutional responsibilities of filling this vacancy to make sure that our great state has two senators working in Washington.



Of course, its not hard to lose when you're a two faced liar and not playing to win in the first place.
 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
winnar111, it is called a bluff. moral authority != legal authority. They were hoping to shame Blago into doing the right thing. He did not, and they have no recourse...
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,876
6,784
126
My guess is there was no way they were going to seat some asshole who bought the job, but the governor threw them a curve and appointed a half way decent appointee without any kickbacks. So a just determination not to seat corruption gave way to the justice of seating a decent choice. I don't think it's more complicated than that, but one always sees oneself in the motivation of others. I see decent motivation because I am a decent person. The OP, well the OP, you can judge for yourself.

Sorry, OP, but the fact is that wherever you go, there you will be.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.