• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Burning Hot: Get up to $35k off your next Maserati!!

This is not even lukewarm. You think US and Korean cars have bad depreciation? You can pick up 2003 Maserati coupe or convertible for about $30k. Most of these cars have under 30k miles on it. You want the manual as the service costs is much less. You'll get Ferrari like service cost if you get the automatic. Swap out the exhaust and you'll get the same high pitched Ferrari sound.
 
Originally posted by: BeauJangles
Originally posted by: Kenazo
I would consider it, but the mileage is just too poor.

Then you clearly don't have the money to really consider owning a Maserati.

Really...why is the MPG so bad? 12MPG in the city? I would think a semi would get close to that.
 
Originally posted by: rudeguy
Originally posted by: BeauJangles
Originally posted by: Kenazo
I would consider it, but the mileage is just too poor.

Then you clearly don't have the money to really consider owning a Maserati.

Really...why is the MPG so bad? 12MPG in the city? I would think a semi would get close to that.

Fuel consumption of semi-automatic tractor: 5.5 MPG

Loaded they get around 3MPG city
 
Originally posted by: apocalypse
If you can afford one, you don't really need the 35K off.

Point in case of why people who win the Lottery go broke. Just because you have the money doesn't mean you shouldn't wisely spend it.
 
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
hy is the MPG so bad? 12MPG in the city? I would think a semi would get close to that.

Fuel consumption of semi-automatic tractor: 5.5 MPG

Loaded they get around 3MPG city[/quote]

So a 60,000 pound truck only gets 9 MPG worse than this car? I would take a semi fitted with a battering ram over that lil thing.
 
Originally posted by: rudeguy
Originally posted by: LikeLinus

Fuel consumption of semi-automatic tractor: 5.5 MPG

Loaded they get around 3MPG city

So a 60,000 pound truck only gets 9 MPG worse than this car? I would take a semi fitted with a battering ram over that lil thing.

Chicks just don't dig semi trucks!
 
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: rudeguy
Originally posted by: LikeLinus

Fuel consumption of semi-automatic tractor: 5.5 MPG

Loaded they get around 3MPG city

So a 60,000 pound truck only gets 9 MPG worse than this car? I would take a semi fitted with a battering ram over that lil thing.

Chicks just don't dig semi trucks!

They do if they have a hot tub and bar in the trailer.
 
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: apocalypse
If you can afford one, you don't really need the 35K off.

Point in case of why people who win the Lottery go broke. Just because you have the money doesn't mean you shouldn't wisely spend it.

No? If you can afford one, you can afford to pay the extra 35K without it being a burden on your finances. Of course, those with wealth will still look for deals, but it doesn't change the fact that they could afford to buy the car at regular price.
 
Originally posted by: rudeguy
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: rudeguy
Originally posted by: LikeLinus

Fuel consumption of semi-automatic tractor: 5.5 MPG

Loaded they get around 3MPG city

So a 60,000 pound truck only gets 9 MPG worse than this car? I would take a semi fitted with a battering ram over that lil thing.

Chicks just don't dig semi trucks!

They dig tractors though!

wat

the


fuck
 
Back
Top