- Sep 10, 2003
- 16,755
- 63
- 91
The Washington Monthly lists this as theirMonthly Journalism Award recipient.
They have interviews from members of the unit. This is all substantiated by the Army. The Toledo Blade is a well established paper. The authors spent over a year researching and interviewing.
I heard about this series from NOW, With Bill Moyers, and it seems to be getting little mainstream attention. You would think that if we really had a savagely liberal media stuff like this would get mentioned by the big media players.
Here is a gruesome tidbid:
Do people actually believe we should use the military to save people from themselves? They are trained to kill, and sadly, they, as all militaries have done since the rise of organized societies, sometimes kill the people that we apparently want the to "save."
They have interviews from members of the unit. This is all substantiated by the Army. The Toledo Blade is a well established paper. The authors spent over a year researching and interviewing.
I heard about this series from NOW, With Bill Moyers, and it seems to be getting little mainstream attention. You would think that if we really had a savagely liberal media stuff like this would get mentioned by the big media players.
Here is a gruesome tidbid:
Women and children were intentionally blown up in underground bunkers. Elderly farmers were shot as they toiled in the fields. Prisoners were tortured and executed - their ears and scalps severed for souvenirs. One soldier kicked out the teeth of executed civilians for their gold fillings.
Two soldiers tried to stop the killings, but their pleas were ignored by commanders. The Army launched an investigation in 1971 that lasted 41/2 years - the longest-known war-crime investigation of the Vietnam conflict.
The case reached the highest levels of the Pentagon and the Nixon White House.
Investigators concluded that 18 soldiers committed war crimes ranging from murder and assault to dereliction of duty. But no one was charged.
Since the war ended, the American public has been fed a dose of movies fictionalizing the excesses of U.S. units in Vietnam, such as Apocalypse Now and Platoon. But in reality, most war-crime cases focused on a single event, like the My Lai massacre.
The Tiger Force case is different. The atrocities took place over seven months, leaving an untold number dead - possibly several hundred civilians, former soldiers and villagers now say.
One medic said he counted 120 unarmed villagers killed in one month.
Do people actually believe we should use the military to save people from themselves? They are trained to kill, and sadly, they, as all militaries have done since the rise of organized societies, sometimes kill the people that we apparently want the to "save."
By the time Tiger Force soldiers stopped firing their weapons, six people were dead, including two children.
They weren't carrying weapons, or dressed in enemy uniforms, but it didn't matter: They were living in a free-fire zone.
For Vietnamese civilians, it was a dangerous decision.
It meant they were in an area where the U.S. military could strike without warning.
No approval was necessary for soldiers to open fire or order air strikes on a specific region - or village - as long as two conditions were met: Troops had to be attacked, and their targets had to be military.