ScrapSilicon - If you don't reboot your PC once in 26 days you can not be too much of a tinkerer. You may have gotten lucky. Every major site I've seen has said the Intel chipsets are better then anything you can hook an AMD to. First generation 845 boards are more stable then the 266A. I turn my PC off at night so I'm not sure how it would perform. I've had it since 04/10/01 and have not been forced to reboot due to error. I have not seen a BSOD. It has not crashed. No I'm not a tinkerer. I load it leave then load it again. I use D815EEA's and D815EEA2's at work and have not had to return a single one. We have roughly 40 PC's with one of those 2. They don't crash either. Most are never rebooted here at work. The one I'm using right now has been up for 45 days or so without a reboot. And that doesn't just happen once. It happens everytime I make a new image for the type of PC it is. It can onlyu be flame bait if it is untrue. In my experience it is true. It is also in the experience of almost all people who use Intel boards and CPU's. That can not be said about the AMD platform. These forums are filled with more AMD issues then Intel issues. That is enough evudence alone to convince me.
http://hardocp.com/reviews/chipsets/kt266a/index5.html
One thing that needs to be taken into consideration is VIA's habit of leaving flaws in their chipsets. We have seen the problems that have basically kept the current KT266 chipset off the market for the last eight months, and we have watched their 686B South Bridge cause all sorts of problems with data corruption at the end user level. I know we were forced to reformat and have lost significant amounts of data due to the 686B South Bridge and its problems.
Let's hope that VIA has learned from its own problems over the last twelve months and does not attempt to bring another unfinished product to market. There is no doubt that VIA is a technology leader that all of us can benefit from, and we must remember to give them a chance or two in our market. It was not too long ago that VIA was a struggling company that only hoped to one day be where they are now. I have confidence in them to do the right thing, and if you have ever spoken to VIA's CEO, Wen Chi Chen, you would also know that there is a moral fabric present in their company that is not often found in many others.
http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1543&p=4
While the current batch of Socket-A motherboards are not nearly as flawless (in regards to overall stability/quality) as the i845 boards we rounded up not too long ago, they are approaching maturity as time goes on. Especially with the incredible effort NVIDIA is putting into drivers for their nForce platform, we may see things improve dramatically for the platform in the next few months.
http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/01q4/011031/index.html
Another factor is the stability and product quality of a system: while all Athlon processors suffered from occasional instability in our tests, the Pentium 4 platform ran without a glitch. Reasons for this behaviour might not lie in the processor itself, but rather in the motherboard design and the chipset used. Future driver updates might not just improve performance but also stability of a platform. And of course, every user knows that the lightweight price tags on Athlon XP processors may have a downside compared to their more expensive Pentium 4 rivals.