Brits scared of 3 inch toy rifle

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Sorry WE are the ones who are sexist :rolleyes: your president wise and beautiful woman is always a Male president wise and beautiful woman because you have no capacity to vote for a woman. <---Sexism

On a side note you keep mentioning discriminating against religion!?! Who gives a shit religion is just a stain on the planet and is completely irrelevant. We don't give a shit about religion unlike you. We've grown out of it.

Your government supports a position that discriminates with regard to gender (not to mention religion) by actually mandating that a male be preferred over a female. There is no vote or opinion with regard to this mandate - it's your own barbaric law.

Moreover, you guys don't have the capacity to vote for a racial minority, so by your own logic you are all racist. However, everyone already knows that the UK is full of racists.

And you do care about religion because your head of state is required to be the head of a stupid religion. You have no concept of the separation of church and state, instead you force religion upon people.

It's freaking barbaric. I'm going to laugh so much once you start worshiping King Charles the Inbred. Are you going to put him on your money, too? hahaha!
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
can i say that this entire thread has now grown to retarded proportions!

this should be in OT, not politics and news if you crazy people want to rant and bitch at each other ffs.

ok, i'm a brit and a lot of us (most everyone i know in fact) couldn't give a fuck about the "royal" family. they are inbred cretins keeping the UK in the 19th century in some ways. i personally couldn't care any less if they all died in a terrorist attack.

some brits have never bothered with braces and so have bad teeth, others have. it's as valid a comment as saying that every american is fat. they are stereotypes as there is some basic truth to it ffs

It's good to know that some British people acknowledge their country's barbaric traditions.
 

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
Your government supports a position that discriminates with regard to gender (not to mention religion) by actually mandating that a male be preferred over a female. There is no vote or opinion with regard to this mandate - it's your own barbaric law.

Moreover, you guys don't have the capacity to vote for a racial minority, so by your own logic you are all racist. However, everyone already knows that the UK is full of racists.

And you do care about religion because your head of state is required to be the head of a stupid religion. You have no concept of the separation of church and state, instead you force religion upon people.

It's freaking barbaric. I'm going to laugh so much once you start worshiping King Charles the Inbred. Are you going to put him on your money, too? hahaha!

I like talking to people so uninformed. Good fun.

We could elect a black person, just hasn't happened yet. We don't care about that religion at all, we did hundreds of years ago when those rules were put in place. Not so anymore. You guys care more. That's the problem with the americunt government. You've got retards running the show. It's fun to watch.

OH! and "Barbaric" I'll tell you whats barbaric letting your entire nation have guns, then declaring that the police aren't there to protect you, then saying "Oh! And you have to pay for health care" Fuck me! You guys have a fucked up way of doing things. That's what you get when you have a load of cunts on a boat from England trying to set up their own country ;)

In any event. Enjoy it, this is it for me on this subject with you. You have no concept of what you're saying so I'll leave you to it.
 
Last edited:
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
Ah, the defender of barbarism is back.

The Queen Bitch is a woman and soon the British sheep will worship Prince Charles as their Overlord, but the line of succession itself is sexist. It's a sexist institution that is imposed upon the people.

Look at your posts. It's all about general population, not the government itself. Maybe it is sexist that the US hasn't had a female president, but then I guess the UK is racist for not having a racial minority as its PM, not to mention that its head of state can only be of one religion. But, really, we all know that the UK is pretty racist anyways.

You follow a barbaric institution that is inherently sexist, racist (according to your own logic), and discriminates from other religions. This institution is imposed by the government, we're not even talking about the people's wishes, which is probably worse since the UK population is incredibly racist.

Fuck the Queen, we only keep them around so Germans and Americans can drool over their superiority, no one in England gives a shit about them.

When it comes to racism, Russia and the US hold the grand prize for being the two most racist nations on this gods green earth, i would say that India is worse but than again, India is a shithole just like China and most of Asia.

How's Iceland treating you?
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
I like talking to people so uninformed. Good fun.

We could elect a black person, just hasn't happened yet.

Uh, we could elect a woman, just hasn't happened yet.

But it doesn't really matter, everyone knows that the British are pretty racist. Moreover, your government supports a sexist institution.

We don't care about that religion at all, we did hundreds of years ago when those rules were put in place. Not so anymore. You guys care more. That's the problem with the americunt government. You've got retards running the show. It's fun to watch.

OK, then abandon your barbaric tradition. Until then, sure seems like you guys care since the head of your state must be the leader of one particular religion.

OH! and "Barbaric" I'll tell you whats barbaric letting your entire nation have guns, then declaring that the police aren't there to protect you, then saying "Oh! And you have to pay for health care" Fuck me! You guys have a fucked up way of doing things. That's what you get when you have a load of cunts on a boat from England trying to set up their own country ;)

I'm pretty sure that worshiping one blood line and preferring males over females and one particular religion over all others is probably among the most barbaric things that you can do.

I'm pretty sure that this is the British attempt to hang on to some tradition as they are pretty much a meaningless world power and soon , if not already, their former slave colonies will surpass them on the world stage.

In any event. Enjoy it, this is it for me on this subject with you. You have no concept of what you're saying so I'll leave you to it.

Say hi to the future King Charles the Inbred for me. HAHAHA! King Charles!
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Fuck the Queen, we only keep them around so Germans and Americans can drool over their superiority, no one in England gives a shit about them.

When it comes to racism, Russia and the US hold the grand prize for being the two most racist nations on this gods green earth, i would say that India is worse but than again, India is a shithole just like China and most of Asia.

How's Iceland treating you?

Fuck the Queen? Isn't that treason?!

OK, then stop having a 'royal family.' Until then, sure seems like you guys care about them and this other British fellow sure seems to care about them.

I don't think that a British person can ever say that any other country is generally racist. Hell, the freaking US President is a racial minority. The equivalent would never happen in the UK, largely because it's full of racists who cling to barbaric traditions.

I agree, India probably is pretty racist (along with China), but even these 'shithole' countries abandoned a lot of their barbaric practices...something that the UK refuses to do. Moreover, those two 'shitholes' are already more important than the UK on the global stage. In 15-20 years, especially at the rate the UK is going down and India & China are going up, it's pretty clear that the UK is going to be a permanent shithole at the whims of India and China.

From the 'glory days' of raping the entire world 100 times over to being an insignificant speck that is now subservient to its former colonies. What a dramatic fall. But, hey, at least you guys will have a toothless King Charles the Inbred around!
 
Last edited:

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
Uh, we could elect a woman, just hasn't happened yet.

But it doesn't really matter, everyone knows that the British are pretty racist. Moreover, your government supports a sexist institution.



OK, then abandon your barbaric tradition. Until then, sure seems like you guys care since the head of your state must be the leader of one particular religion.



I'm pretty sure that worshiping one blood line and preferring males over females and one particular religion over all others is probably among the most barbaric things that you can do.

I'm pretty sure that this is the British attempt to hang on to some tradition as they are pretty much a meaningless world power and soon , if not already, their former slave colonies will surpass them on the world stage.



Say hi to the future King Charles the Inbred for me. HAHAHA! King Charles!

I love how you get so hung up on an ancient family that has no baring on real life in the UK. Your ignorance betrays you.

I'll say hi to charles hahahahahaha next time I see him hhahahahhaha.hahahahaha King hahahahaha Charles HAahahaha good fun to laugh...?
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
I love how you get so hung up on an ancient family that has no baring on real life in the UK. Your ignorance betrays you.

I'll say hi to charles hahahahahaha next time I see him hhahahahhaha.hahahahaha King hahahahaha Charles HAahahaha good fun to laugh...?

And yet that inbred family is supported by the government/people and one of its members is the head of state. OK, sure.

I wonder if King Charles the Inbred will be on all of your bills. Ugh, just another ugly, pasty, droopy British person. Maybe the UK will go to the euro at that point just to not have to stare at that ugly British mug.

Also, I thought that you said "this is it for me on this subject with you." What happened? Did the future King Charles the Inbred order you here?
 

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
And yet that inbred family is supported by the government/people and one of its members is the head of state. OK, sure.

I wonder if King Charles the Inbred will be on all of your bills. Ugh, just another ugly, pasty, droopy British person. Maybe the UK will go to the euro at that point just to not have to stare at that ugly British mug.

Also, I thought that you said "this is it for me on this subject with you." What happened? Did the future King Charles the Inbred order you here?

Good call.

Keep the cunts you call founding fathers, we didn't want em. They were inbred.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Good call.

Keep the cunts you call founding fathers, we didn't want em. They were inbred.

I don't think that they were related to each other at all, unlike your future King Charles, who is obviously very very inbred and consequently likely toothless like any other good Brit.

But you did want those 'founding fathers' because you wanted to own what was their country. Maybe if the British didn't worship a human being as if it were the Sun or something, then maybe they would have retained the US land instead of now just being an insignificant speck in the world.
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
Is this really what we want P&N to be like? Blindly and viciously calling each other "cunts" for pages at a time? Grow up, the lot of you.
 

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
Is this really what we want P&N to be like? Blindly and viciously calling each other "cunts" for pages at a time? Grow up, the lot of you.

I didn't call anyone here cunts. Just politicians. People insult my country for moronic reasons, I hit back for equally moronic reasons.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
I didn't call anyone here cunts. Just politicians. People insult my country for moronic reasons, I hit back for equally moronic reasons.

Being opposed to a sexist and religious discriminatory institution isn't moronic. I'd actually say that worshiping the future King Charles the Inbred, similar to ancient humans worshiping the Sun as some sort of deity, is pretty moronic.

Most of the world thinks this way, too. That's why we threw away the shackles of serfdom and peasanthood while you're still embracing it and celebrating one bloodline.
 

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
Being opposed to a sexist and religious discriminatory institution isn't moronic. I'd actually say that worshiping the future King Charles the Inbred, similar to ancient humans worshiping the Sun as some sort of deity, is pretty moronic.

Most of the world thinks this way, too. That's why we threw away the shackles of serfdom and peasanthood while you're still embracing it and celebrating one bloodline.

The way you talk is moronic, the fact that you are unable to understand that the royal family have no power any more is moronic, the fact that you can't understand that every day life in britain is not effected by the royal family is moronic, the fact that you think that america is better than britain is moronic.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
The way you talk is moronic, the fact that you are unable to understand that the royal family have no power any more is moronic, the fact that you can't understand that every day life in britain is not effected by the royal family is moronic, the fact that you think that america is better than britain is moronic.

You're financially supporting the royal family all while your country is going down the drain. Why are you going through austerity measures, in an attempt to resuscitate your country, but not just completely cutting off this one blood line from government assistance? Tax them like the peons such as yourself while we're at it. That would probably spare the UK peasants at least a bit of the pain of the rapidly collapsing UK power. Moreover, maybe they could sell Buckingham Palace to the Germans, Chinese, or Indians. That would help out a lot, too.

Then you can join the rest of the world in 2011 instead of sticking with your 12th century ideals about worshiping some old hag and her inbred son who is toothless.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Being opposed to a sexist and religious discriminatory institution isn't moronic. I'd actually say that worshiping the future King Charles the Inbred, similar to ancient humans worshiping the Sun as some sort of deity, is pretty moronic.

Most of the world thinks this way, too. That's why we threw away the shackles of serfdom and peasanthood while you're still embracing it and celebrating one bloodline.

Prince Charles has received a lifetime of training to become worshipped like the Sun was thousands of years ago.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Prince Charles has received a lifetime of training to become worshipped like the Sun was thousands of years ago.

I wonder what the future British King Toothless Overlord would do if he wasn't supported by the peons. He would probably be lucky to work at a McDonald's. I can't imagine that the training of becoming worshiped like the Sun provides much in the way of useful skills.
 

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
You're financially supporting the royal family all while your country is going down the drain. Why are you going through austerity measures, in an attempt to resuscitate your country, but not just completely cutting off this one blood line from government assistance? Tax them like the peons such as yourself while we're at it. That would probably spare the UK peasants at least a bit of the pain of the rapidly collapsing UK power. Moreover, maybe they could sell Buckingham Palace to the Germans, Chinese, or Indians. That would help out a lot, too.

Then you can join the rest of the world in 2011 instead of sticking with your 12th century ideals about worshiping some old hag and her inbred son who is toothless.

This is my point, you know nothing, nothing. the 36.7 million that we spend on the royal family is nothing, it gets us known the world over, a union with a lot of countries under the crown, the head of the common wealth, an ambassador for our nation, an a representation of an English heritiage that we don't want to give up.

You have no idea what you are talking about and your drivel about charles' teeth shows that who gives a fuck what his teeth are like? You that's who. Not us, the people that matter when it comes to having a royal family.

We spend 36.7 Million on a royal family. You spend $793 Billion on health care, then you have to buy insurance, who's country is fucked up? I can walk into any hospital in the country and get free health care you have to pay $200 to ride in an ambulance.

Inbred Royal Family: "It isn't a fair or an accurate assessment. Inbred means one is born of parents who were themselves closely related. The royal family isn't actually inbred, in fact there hasn't been a first cousin marriage in over a century. There was a time when they often married cousins, but this was at a time when it was considered perfectly acceptable for anyone, royal or not, to marry a cousin. However, most people rationally know the royal family are not actually inbred; people say that because they hate the royal family and sadly aren't intelligent enough to think of a more clever attack."
 
Last edited:

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
I wonder what the future British King Toothless Overlord would do if he wasn't supported by the peons. He would probably be lucky to work at a McDonald's. I can't imagine that the training of becoming worshiped like the Sun provides much in the way of useful skills.

I think that he can do a good job as a clinical drug test subject. Centuries of inbreeding creates a lot of medical issues.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
This is my point, you know nothing, nothing. the 36.7 million that we spend on the royal family is nothing, it gets us known the world over, a union with a lot of countries under the crown, the head of the common wealth, an ambassador for our nation, an a representation of an English heritiage that we don't want to give up.

$36.7 million is a ton of money. I'm pretty sure that people would know the UK world over without spending $36.7 million on some inbred royal bitch. It's not hard to forget about the nation that raped and pillaged the entire world 100 times over. Moreover, you could replace a lot of those functions with actually deserving citizens, thereby employing someone of higher qualities and better genetic distribution, being that the UK royalty is all inbred and probably full of the typical inbred genetic defects.

Your English heritage is barbaric. Lots of other countries abandoned their previous barbaric beliefs, but the UK is still clinging onto its disgusting beliefs in a last gasp of holding on to former glory. Face it, having to bow down to some royal bitch doesn't give you any glory. The UK is already insignificant on the global stage, the royal bitch isn't going to change anything.

You have no idea what you are talking about and your drivel about charles' teeth shows that who gives a fuck what his teeth are like? You that's who. Not us, the people that matter when it comes to having a royal family.

We spend 36.7 Million on a royal family. You spend $793 Billion on health care, then you have to buy insurance, who's country is fucked up? I can walk into any hospital in the country and get free health care you have to pay $200 to ride in an ambulance.

I still laugh whenever I think of you peasants bowing down to King Charles the Toothless Inbred. The entire world is going to laugh so much at that because most countries realized that worshiping some person of a bloodline as if it were God Reincarnated in Human Form was fucking ridiculous.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
I think that he can do a good job as a clinical drug test subject. Centuries of inbreeding creates a lot of medical issues.

Good point. Maybe the entire royal family could be subjected to a round of medical tests as part of a medical study involving genetic defects.
 

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
$36.7 million is a ton of money. I'm pretty sure that people would know the UK world over without spending $36.7 million on some inbred royal bitch. It's not hard to forget about the nation that raped and pillaged the entire world 100 times over. Moreover, you could replace a lot of those functions with actually deserving citizens, thereby employing someone of higher qualities and better genetic distribution, being that the UK royalty is all inbred and probably full of the typical inbred genetic defects.

Your English heritage is barbaric. Lots of other countries abandoned their previous barbaric beliefs, but the UK is still clinging onto its disgusting beliefs in a last gasp of holding on to former glory. Face it, having to bow down to some royal bitch doesn't give you any glory. The UK is already insignificant on the global stage, the royal bitch isn't going to change anything.



I still laugh whenever I think of you peasants bowing down to King Charles the Toothless Inbred. The entire world is going to laugh so much at that because most countries realized that worshiping some person of a bloodline as if it were God Reincarnated in Human Form was fucking ridiculous.

I love how you think that England still thinks like this, about god and all the other crap.

Also the English royal family is not inbred.

But aside from that because I'm sure you'll just ignore it. The fact that you get so hung up on breeding... Are your mum and dad brother and sister? It's ok if they are I wont tell.

You have no idea what you're talking about, the more I try and debate with you the more I realise that you aren't interested in debate, you are interested in throwing insults because you believe that the UK is better than the US and you are secretly ashamed of it. You are a troll, a childish, childish offensive troll. A lesser human being that wanders around taking shots at countries that you have never even visited, you can't comprehend anything other than the nation that you are born into because you don't have the intellectual capacity to understand. This is my point, you can't understand because you're cuntry is so new, it's a petulant child and you are one of the children. You are now on my ignore list, not because I don't want to talk to you, but because I have come to realise that you don't have the IQ to debate with me on the same level. I'm sorry for you, I'm sorry that your country has failed you so spectacularly that you feel like you have to lash out.

Most of all I pity you, you live in a barbaric country where you have to own a gun to be safe because the police won't help you, you live in a place where if you get shot or hurt you have to pay a fortune to get heath care, but most of all you live in an inbred country that is unable to comprehend anything other than itself. I'm sorry for all these things, and as a result I don't think I can continue attempting to explain my country to someone so hell bent on attacking anything that isn't connected to you. It's ok, I understand, but you trying to understand a country that is better than yours is like an ape trying to understand quantum physics. But you're worse than that, because rather than even attempting to understand you just shove your head in the sand ignore everything you are told and try to insult.

Well you haven't offended or insulted me, you've just made me realise that I pity you, I feel genuinely sorry for you that you are so disappointed with the world around you, and so afraid of anything different.

Luckily for me I love my country, I love how it keeps me safe, I love how it isn't based on religion anymore, I love my health care system, I love the education I recieved, I love how you don't understand it because that means were doing something intellectual.

One day when you've grown up, when you can stop trying to insult what you don't understand PM me and we'll talk properly until then bye.