NutBucket
Lifer
- Aug 30, 2000
- 27,124
- 613
- 126
And its still the OE tire found on the BRZ!RE92 is the worst tire ever made period
Ask any Subaru owner
And its still the OE tire found on the BRZ!RE92 is the worst tire ever made period
Ask any Subaru owner
And its still the OE tire found on the BRZ!
Bridgestone in general is terrible. Hands-down the least sticky, fastest wearing tires on the market. It baffles me as to how they managed to get both terrible traction and treadlife in their Potenza and Turanza lines.
Also, they should consider making their tires round. Kumho and Hankook have better quality control.
? OE tire choices are 99% dictated by the carmaker. Can't blame Bridgestone for providing what the customer wants.Bridgestone in general is terrible. Hands-down the least sticky, fastest wearing tires on the market. It baffles me as to how they managed to get both terrible traction and treadlife in their Potenza and Turanza lines.
Also, they should consider making their tires round. Kumho and Hankook have better quality control.
? OE tire choices are 99% dictated by the carmaker. Can't blame Bridgestone for providing what the customer wants.
The OE tires on my Honda are Turanzas are they're great. Relatively speaking plenty of grip and they're LRR which helps fuel economy. I put similar tires on my MIL's Civic a few months ago. I put RE-960s on our WRX and they're great too. I don't pay much attention to the traction/treadlife ratings as they don't seem to correspond to my real-world results.
Not a personal attack but if you're suggesting Kumho and Hankook are better than Bridgestone I'm not sure what to make of your judgement. Bridgestone and Michelin are generally regarded the best tire manufacturers.
But RE92s are terrible with one exception. Apparently the OE tire on the original Honda Insight was a special version of the '92 and was perfectly matched for that car.
Funny that the Ecopias on the CR-Z tend to be OK. Maybe its just because you're trying to corner in a Prius![]()
Actually my bridgestone is holding up well as far as wear, better than a goodyear aftermarket. As far as stickiness haven't slid yet when its raining. I have luck on my potenzas too on my other car.
Not a personal attack but if you're suggesting Kumho and Hankook are better than Bridgestone
My Maxima had Bridgestone RE92s on it IIRC. Absolutely horrible in the wet. I would never buy that tire again.
Bridgestone in general is terrible. Hands-down the least sticky, fastest wearing tires on the market. It baffles me as to how they managed to get both terrible traction and treadlife in their Potenza and Turanza lines.
Also, they should consider making their tires round. Kumho and Hankook have better quality control.
To be honest my bridgestone right now is very close to the wear bar never experienced sliding yet but I have to say I don't drive crazy. Just normal driving. I have 4 goodyear (almost new)100 miles on them, a take off from the same car model as mine ready to replace my bridgestones. I am confident that I will yield the same result as my bridgestone because the auto manufacturer chose these tires for my model car.
I will in the future keep a closer eye on bridgestone.
WRONG.. seems like every tire company has shit tires in their lineup. My RE070's that were on my Miata are amazing tires on the racetrack. Super sticky.. like your hands sticks to them once they are heated up.