cronos
Diamond Member
- Nov 7, 2001
- 9,380
- 26
- 101
Not a valid argument.. if the targets are not fighting back I can kill them with a 22 cal bird rifle.. not exactly a challenge..
I guess I'm supposed to be happy and safe now to know that this is what you (and probably most of the weapon fans) are thinking?
the fact that is was a legal semi auto rifle that just happens to look military does not mean it was the soul reason for the shooting.
Read my post again. I don't care how it looks. In fact, I don't even know what it looks like.
Please get over yourselves..
Because I came to a logical conclusion over something?
There are literally MILLIONS of AR-15s and other legal Military looking weps out there in private hands.
There are but a handful of shootings world wide using those weapons.
So you want more shootings/assault with this weapon until you could finally say it's an 'assault rifle'? Sure.
Listen, read my post again, I was never trying to force my opinion on anyone. In fact I just said I understand that there's an intricate rule to these things, to what you're supposed to call these things (gun, pistol, rifle, etc). I don't know these rules, and at this point I consider it irrelevant. If I know that a rifle was used in an assault that killed 27 people, I will call it an 'assault rifle'. You are allowed to disagree with me.