Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Seeing that both FOX and Weakly Standard are 'In House Neo-con House Organs',
let's see what the less partisan news sources like Pravda or Socialist Worker's take on this is.
I'm sure that they get selectilvely leaked gospel truth too, don't you think ?
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Seeing that both FOX and Weakly Standard are 'In House Neo-con House Organs',
let's see what the less partisan news sources like Pravda or Socialist Worker's take on this is.
I'm sure that they get selectilvely leaked gospel truth too, don't you think ?
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Seeing that both FOX and Weakly Standard are 'In House Neo-con House Organs',
let's see what the less partisan news sources like Pravda or Socialist Worker's take on this is.
I'm sure that they get selectilvely leaked gospel truth too, don't you think ?
A search on Doug Feith may further confirm your suspicions.
Well if you're focused specifically on the question of the links between the Saddam Hussein regime and al-Qaeda, people who do not see the link are just not familiar with the evidence, much of which we have in recent months talked about publicly. There have been linkages between the Iraqi government and al-Qaeda going back more or less a decade. They have involved co-operation between the Iraqi intelligence and al-Qaeda operatives on training and combined operations regarding bomb making and chemical and biological weapons. I'm not suggesting that the Iraqi regime was the principal state sponsor of al-Qaeda, it wasn't, that was the Taliban and there were important connections earlier with the Sudan but there are linkages and the Saddam Hussein regime has had linkages not only with al-Qaeda where high level people also were guests of the regime in Baghdad and guests to this day as Colin Powell recently discussed at in some detail at the United Nations but there are connections also between the Saddam Hussein regime and other terrorist organisations so the idea that that regime would make use of terrorist organisations is I think very well grounded in information that we know.
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Legit enough?
This one?
AP and yahoo?
CNN?
Good enough for everyone?
CkG
None of those confirm the Weekly Standards reporting of the contents of the memo. In fact they do the oppositeOriginally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Good enough for everyone?
CkG
He added, however, that much of the material published by the Standard was raw intelligence reporting that in some cases "was questioned by other sources, comes from third countries that are not reliable or could not be verified."
He said the memo provided a list "and is not a new analysis or finding of any connection not previously existing."
In its Saturday release, the Pentagon took the unusual step of saying, "News reports that the Defense Department recently confirmed new information with respect to contacts between al Qaeda and Iraq . . . are inaccurate." The release also said the memo "was not an analysis of the substantive issue of the relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda and drew no conclusions."
W. Patrick Lang, former head of the Middle East section of the DIA, said yesterday that the Standard article "is a listing of a mass of unconfirmed reports, many of which themselves indicate that the two groups continued to try to establish some sort of relationship. If they had such a productive relationship, why did they have to keep trying?"
Breaking news: Intelligence memo links Saddam, Osama
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Hmmm, a lot of "secret" memos being released lately. The memo is interesting, but brings up a number of questions. Am I to believe Feith had all this alleged evidence and just sat on it for the last two years? Allowing the intel community to summarize the Al Qaeda-Iraq connection as "tenuous?" And since when is the defense dep't in the intel business? Were they looking to cherry pick even the most unreliable intel in order to build a case that wasn't really there?
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Hmmm, a lot of "secret" memos being released lately. The memo is interesting, but brings up a number of questions. Am I to believe Feith had all this alleged evidence and just sat on it for the last two years? Allowing the intel community to summarize the Al Qaeda-Iraq connection as "tenuous?" And since when is the defense dep't in the intel business? Were they looking to cherry pick even the most unreliable intel in order to build a case that wasn't really there?
Originally posted by: Zebo
Breaking news: Intelligence memo links Saddam, Osama
I don't see any proof in there and read the whole thing. Would you be so kind as show me proof besides heresay and allegations?
Oh and I forgot even the DOD says weekly standard story was a LIE
Case Decidedly Not Closed
The Defense Dept. memo allegedly proving a link between Al Qaeda and Saddam does nothing of the sort
Nov. 19 ? A leaked Defense Department memo claiming new evidence of an ?operational relationship? between Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein?s former regime is mostly based on unverified claims that were first advanced by some top Bush administration officials more than a year ago?and were largely discounted at the time by the U.S. intelligence community, according to current and former U.S. intelligence officials.
