• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

BREAKING NEWS: Grand Jury Indicts Michael Jackson

That's NOT breaking news. Did anyone actually think that Jackson would NOT get indicted? This is simply standard procedure on the way to his trial.
 
Originally posted by: jumpr
That's NOT breaking news. Did anyone actually think that Jackson would NOT get indicted? This is simply standard procedure on the way to his trial.
Click to expand...

"A grand jury indictment would supersede the current criminal case and eliminate the need for a preliminary hearing to determine if there is enough evidence to put Jackson on trial."

His million dollar attorneys were doing everything they could to prevent this trial from ever happening. They lose.
 
Originally posted by: Red
Originally posted by: jumpr

That's NOT breaking news. Did anyone actually think that Jackson would NOT get indicted? This is simply standard procedure on the way to his trial.
Click to expand...



"A grand jury indictment would supersede the current criminal case and eliminate the need for a preliminary hearing to determine if there is enough evidence to put Jackson on trial."



His million dollar attorneys were doing everything they could to prevent this trial from ever happening. They lose.
Click to expand...
Again, my question: did anyone think that Jackson would somehow escape indictment? The government doesn't like to look feeble, and this is no different. This is a high-profile case, and it was extremely unlikely from the start that MJ would be let off easy. Such an occurrence would make the government look EXTREMELY weak.
 
Originally posted by: Red

"A grand jury indictment would supersede the current criminal case and eliminate the need for a preliminary hearing to determine if there is enough evidence to put Jackson on trial."



His million dollar attorneys were doing everything they could to prevent this trial from ever happening. They lose.
Click to expand...

There is nothing his attorneys could have done about this. The grand jury is sealed, and neither the defendant nor his attorneys are present.
 
good. these big stars (jason williams, rkelly, MJ, KB...maybe KB) need to get it thru their head that they arent above the law
 
Originally posted by: Shockwave

What do you mean woot? A pyscho, oney grubbing whore accused someone of raping them and shes on her way to WINNING you numbskull!
Click to expand...

I take it you were in the room and saw what happened? If not, STFU and let the process work.
 
Originally posted by: Shockwave
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Sifl
Judge deals blow to Kobe Bryant defense

Unfortunate. Headline.
Click to expand...
w00t! 😀:beer:
Click to expand...
What do you mean woot? A pyscho, oney grubbing whore accused someone of raping them and shes on her way to WINNING you numbskull!
Click to expand...
The propaganda is strong is this one...

First, replace the name "Kobe Bryant" (or any other "star") with some Joe Blow and you'd be screaming for that rapist to have his balls cut off. As for her money-grubbing, has she sued? Not yet, it appears. Did she seek publicity? No, it was Kobe's defense who released her personal information to the public, against her will and violating victims-rights laws.

Second, in both Colorado and California, the laws regarding rape pretty much say that rape occurs anytime the female says it does. End of story. Don't pull out the second she asks you to and it's rape.

Kobe should have followed my life motto, which is "Be careful who you fsck". He didn't. He loses. As the world's most unashamed Laker-hater, I'm cheering his whole way down.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top