• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

BREAKING: al-Zarqawi reportedly arrested in Iraq

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: lancestorm
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: lancestorm
al-Zarqawi should be Priority #1 anyways. Bin Laden is a stupid figure head.
So's the pope but who do people follow?


<sigh>
Yes. But who coordinates the attacks right now? Not Laden.
And you know this how? Terrorism is not just in Iraq. Remember? In fact, there was NO terrorism in Iraq before we invaded it.

Lovely.
 
the beheading of Zarqarwi, I'd pay to see that, but let the Russians do it. That guy is pond scum, not fit to breath oxygen.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: lancestorm
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: lancestorm
al-Zarqawi should be Priority #1 anyways. Bin Laden is a stupid figure head.
So's the pope but who do people follow?


<sigh>
Yes. But who coordinates the attacks right now? Not Laden.
And you know this how? Terrorism is not just in Iraq. Remember? In fact, there was NO terrorism in Iraq before we invaded it.

Lovely.

No... but there were terrorists there.
 
UPDATE //
Tue Jan 04 2005 11:18:47 ET

U.S. military and intelligence sources are denying print and broadcast reports that terrorist Abu-Musab al-Zarqawi has been arrested in Iraq, MSNBC reported Tuesday.

MSNBC said senior U.S. military and intelligence sources told it the reports are not true. A newspaper in the United Arab Emirates, al-Bayane, reported in its Tuesday edition that the Jordanian-born terrorist had been arrested in Baqouba, Iraq. Iraqi Kurdistan radio also reported the arrest of al-Zarqawi.

The U.S. military in December said al-Zarqawi likely is in the Baghdad area.
 
Originally posted by: MidasKnight
UPDATE //
Tue Jan 04 2005 11:18:47 ET

U.S. military and intelligence sources are denying print and broadcast reports that terrorist Abu-Musab al-Zarqawi has been arrested in Iraq, MSNBC reported Tuesday.

MSNBC said senior U.S. military and intelligence sources told it the reports are not true. A newspaper in the United Arab Emirates, al-Bayane, reported in its Tuesday edition that the Jordanian-born terrorist had been arrested in Baqouba, Iraq. Iraqi Kurdistan radio also reported the arrest of al-Zarqawi.

The U.S. military in December said al-Zarqawi likely is in the Baghdad area.

Haha
 
Originally posted by: MidasKnight
UPDATE //
Tue Jan 04 2005 11:18:47 ET

U.S. military and intelligence sources are denying print and broadcast reports that terrorist Abu-Musab al-Zarqawi has been arrested in Iraq, MSNBC reported Tuesday.

MSNBC said senior U.S. military and intelligence sources told it the reports are not true. A newspaper in the United Arab Emirates, al-Bayane, reported in its Tuesday edition that the Jordanian-born terrorist had been arrested in Baqouba, Iraq. Iraqi Kurdistan radio also reported the arrest of al-Zarqawi.

The U.S. military in December said al-Zarqawi likely is in the Baghdad area.

Could be a ploy to take the heat off of any "human rights" violations that anyone may want to step in and witness. I'm sure the intelligence community sees great benefit in NOT allowing the world to know this information right away.
 
Originally posted by: Rogue
Originally posted by: MidasKnight
UPDATE //
Tue Jan 04 2005 11:18:47 ET

U.S. military and intelligence sources are denying print and broadcast reports that terrorist Abu-Musab al-Zarqawi has been arrested in Iraq, MSNBC reported Tuesday.

MSNBC said senior U.S. military and intelligence sources told it the reports are not true. A newspaper in the United Arab Emirates, al-Bayane, reported in its Tuesday edition that the Jordanian-born terrorist had been arrested in Baqouba, Iraq. Iraqi Kurdistan radio also reported the arrest of al-Zarqawi.

The U.S. military in December said al-Zarqawi likely is in the Baghdad area.

Could be a ploy to take the heat off of any "human rights" violations that anyone may want to step in and witness. I'm sure the intelligence community sees great benefit in NOT allowing the world to know this information right away.
LOL..."Quick, torture him before the news breaks!"
 
Originally posted by: DevilsAdvocate
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: lancestorm
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: lancestorm
al-Zarqawi should be Priority #1 anyways. Bin Laden is a stupid figure head.
So's the pope but who do people follow?


<sigh>
Yes. But who coordinates the attacks right now? Not Laden.
And you know this how? Terrorism is not just in Iraq. Remember? In fact, there was NO terrorism in Iraq before we invaded it.

Lovely.
No... but there were terrorists there.
Where?
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: DevilsAdvocate
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: lancestorm
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: lancestorm
al-Zarqawi should be Priority #1 anyways. Bin Laden is a stupid figure head.
So's the pope but who do people follow?


<sigh>
Yes. But who coordinates the attacks right now? Not Laden.
And you know this how? Terrorism is not just in Iraq. Remember? In fact, there was NO terrorism in Iraq before we invaded it.

Lovely.
No... but there were terrorists there.
Where?

wasnt al-Zarqawi in Iraq before we invaded?
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: DevilsAdvocate
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: lancestorm
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: lancestorm
al-Zarqawi should be Priority #1 anyways. Bin Laden is a stupid figure head.
So's the pope but who do people follow?


<sigh>
Yes. But who coordinates the attacks right now? Not Laden.
And you know this how? Terrorism is not just in Iraq. Remember? In fact, there was NO terrorism in Iraq before we invaded it.

Lovely.
No... but there were terrorists there.
Where?

OMFG! Conjur left his safe P&amp;N haven! !
 
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: DevilsAdvocate
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: lancestorm
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: lancestorm
al-Zarqawi should be Priority #1 anyways. Bin Laden is a stupid figure head.
So's the pope but who do people follow?


<sigh>
Yes. But who coordinates the attacks right now? Not Laden.
And you know this how? Terrorism is not just in Iraq. Remember? In fact, there was NO terrorism in Iraq before we invaded it.

Lovely.
No... but there were terrorists there.
Where?

OMFG! Conjur left his safe P&amp;N haven! !

he won't last. reality and logic are bitches.
 
Originally posted by: rdubbz420
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: DevilsAdvocate
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: lancestorm
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: lancestorm
al-Zarqawi should be Priority #1 anyways. Bin Laden is a stupid figure head.
So's the pope but who do people follow?


<sigh>
Yes. But who coordinates the attacks right now? Not Laden.
And you know this how? Terrorism is not just in Iraq. Remember? In fact, there was NO terrorism in Iraq before we invaded it.

Lovely.
No... but there were terrorists there.
Where?
wasnt al-Zarqawi in Iraq before we invaded?
In a Kurdish-controlled area, protected by the U.S. no-fly zone. In fact, Bush had three chances to get al-Zarqawi before the war...imagine that.
 
Originally posted by: Megatomic
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: bapace
cut off his head with a swiss army knife. eye for an eye b!tches. Oh, and shoot first, ask questions/ID the people later.

let the hypocrisy begin
I'm sorry, is al-Zarqawi your personal hero?

What kind of question is that? People b!tch how they are so inhumane, then we get statements like this. It's not outrage, it's xenophobia. When you reach the point when you become what you hate fighting it, you have already lost; there is nothing left to fight for.
 
Originally posted by: Megatomic
How is wanting to exact retribution on one man xenophobia?

I didn't say it was. I was refering to the idea that we are better than those savage beasts no matter what the fvck we do. It isn't founded on outrage if you immediately do the same thing. My point? You have nothing left to fight for other than :cookies;'s if you resort to cutting people's heads off to prevent people from cutting people's heads off.
 
Back
Top