My job: computer consultant (incorporated) working through an agency 
Oct 10-26
Manager goes on vacation. I am not informed.
I find out by sending an email to him and getting an auto-reply vacation message.
Oct 23
I give my 2 weeks notice to my agency that I'm quitting.
Oct 30
Manager comes back to work. Agency informs him I'm quitting.
I don't say anything assuming he knows already.
Oct 31, 2000
I come back from lunch and Manager sits me down at a Conference Room.
Mgr says that users have been complaining about my performance.
I was never given a warning. This is news to me.
I ask Mgr if he would like me to leave TODAY.
Mgr says yes.
I just ask that my timesheet be signed and I would be on my way out the building.
Mgr says OK.
Mgr then asks why I didn't tell him the day he came back that I was quitting.
I reply by asking him why he didn't inform me he was going on vacation for 2wks.
Mgr said that's irrelevant.
Mgr then asks me again why I didn't tell him I was quitting when he came back from vacation.
I said it is for the same reason why he didn't tell me he went on vacation. It's irrelevant.
Mgr gets mad as I leave and calls security to escort me out the building.
Mgr says that he is not signing anything and to have my agency call him about timesheets.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE AFTERMATH:
Nov 1
I call the agency.
Agency knows about what had transpired.
Agency is bitter that I quit and blamed me for everything.
Agency said that I jeopardized their relationship with the new client since I was their foot in the door.
Agency says I will get paid when they do and that there were no guarantees.
Agency asks me to refax signed first 4 weeks of timesheets and I do.
Nov 27
I call the agency.
I tell the agency that it has been nearly a month now and my contract states that I should get paid 30 days after invoice.
I tell the agency that it is fine to me if I don't get paid for those last 2 days.
According to the agency, they just got paid for my work completed 2 months ago by the client this month.
Agency wants me to bear some of the risk since I put their relationship with their client in jeopardy.
I told the agency that according to my contract, I was supposed to get paid 30 days after invoicing.
Agency says that they are not going to pay me first, not knowing if the client will pay them for October.
Agency says that yes, it is a breach of contract, but said that I had breached the contract first by misrepresenting them in such a way that the client wanted to get rid of me.
Agency says they would be happy to tell that in front of a judge if I want to sue them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QUESTIONS:
DO I HAVE A CASE FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT?
WHAT COURT WOULD I GO TO SINCE THE SUM IS OVER $10,000?
The aggrieved party, to help support his claim for breach, should
have done all the things required of him under the contract up until
the time of breach, and must have done nothing to make it impossible
or unreasonably difficult for the other party to perform his share.
The nonperforming party can be expected to make excuses for his
conduct, and he will try to find ways to blame the other party--an
excellent argument for performing one's own side of a contract
punctiliously and in a manner that leaves a record which others can
see.
There are so many possible ways for performance of a contract to give
rise to dissatisfaction that the courts have been forced to analyze
the matter in much more subtle terms than "breached" or "not
breached."
There has to be a limit to the quibbles of the dissatisfied customer,
for example, or the courts would be swamped with trials over precise
shades of paint and tiny imperfections in services. A party can
unintentionally fall short of perfection, but if he has substantially
performed his duties under the contract, he can still sue the other
party for payment.
The dissatisfied party, on the other hand, can usually win some
adjustment in the amount of payment as compensation for the minor
defects in the performance.
			
			Oct 10-26
Manager goes on vacation. I am not informed.
I find out by sending an email to him and getting an auto-reply vacation message.
Oct 23
I give my 2 weeks notice to my agency that I'm quitting.
Oct 30
Manager comes back to work. Agency informs him I'm quitting.
I don't say anything assuming he knows already.
Oct 31, 2000
I come back from lunch and Manager sits me down at a Conference Room.
Mgr says that users have been complaining about my performance.
I was never given a warning. This is news to me.
I ask Mgr if he would like me to leave TODAY.
Mgr says yes.
I just ask that my timesheet be signed and I would be on my way out the building.
Mgr says OK.
Mgr then asks why I didn't tell him the day he came back that I was quitting.
I reply by asking him why he didn't inform me he was going on vacation for 2wks.
Mgr said that's irrelevant.
Mgr then asks me again why I didn't tell him I was quitting when he came back from vacation.
I said it is for the same reason why he didn't tell me he went on vacation. It's irrelevant.
Mgr gets mad as I leave and calls security to escort me out the building.
Mgr says that he is not signing anything and to have my agency call him about timesheets.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE AFTERMATH:
Nov 1
I call the agency.
Agency knows about what had transpired.
Agency is bitter that I quit and blamed me for everything.
Agency said that I jeopardized their relationship with the new client since I was their foot in the door.
Agency says I will get paid when they do and that there were no guarantees.
Agency asks me to refax signed first 4 weeks of timesheets and I do.
Nov 27
I call the agency.
I tell the agency that it has been nearly a month now and my contract states that I should get paid 30 days after invoice.
I tell the agency that it is fine to me if I don't get paid for those last 2 days.
According to the agency, they just got paid for my work completed 2 months ago by the client this month.
Agency wants me to bear some of the risk since I put their relationship with their client in jeopardy.
I told the agency that according to my contract, I was supposed to get paid 30 days after invoicing.
Agency says that they are not going to pay me first, not knowing if the client will pay them for October.
Agency says that yes, it is a breach of contract, but said that I had breached the contract first by misrepresenting them in such a way that the client wanted to get rid of me.
Agency says they would be happy to tell that in front of a judge if I want to sue them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QUESTIONS:
DO I HAVE A CASE FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT?
WHAT COURT WOULD I GO TO SINCE THE SUM IS OVER $10,000?
The aggrieved party, to help support his claim for breach, should
have done all the things required of him under the contract up until
the time of breach, and must have done nothing to make it impossible
or unreasonably difficult for the other party to perform his share.
The nonperforming party can be expected to make excuses for his
conduct, and he will try to find ways to blame the other party--an
excellent argument for performing one's own side of a contract
punctiliously and in a manner that leaves a record which others can
see.
There are so many possible ways for performance of a contract to give
rise to dissatisfaction that the courts have been forced to analyze
the matter in much more subtle terms than "breached" or "not
breached."
There has to be a limit to the quibbles of the dissatisfied customer,
for example, or the courts would be swamped with trials over precise
shades of paint and tiny imperfections in services. A party can
unintentionally fall short of perfection, but if he has substantially
performed his duties under the contract, he can still sue the other
party for payment.
The dissatisfied party, on the other hand, can usually win some
adjustment in the amount of payment as compensation for the minor
defects in the performance.
 
				
		 
			 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		
 Facebook
Facebook Twitter
Twitter