• Guest, The rules for the P & N subforum have been updated to prohibit "ad hominem" or personal attacks against other posters. See the full details in the post "Politics and News Rules & Guidelines."

Brazil moves against Google over videos

Not open for further replies.


Feb 3, 2007

Le Sigh
A Brazilian court has ordered YouTube to remove an anti-Islam video that prompted violent protests across the Muslim world, while an elections court has ordered the arrest of a Google executive after the popular video-sharing service failed to remove a video attacking a mayoral candidate.

Tuesday’s decision by a state court in Sao Paulo, home to a large Middle Eastern immigrant community, came just hours after Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff criticised "Islamophobia" in Western countries in a speech at the UN.

In a statement, the court said Judge Gilson Delgado Miranda gave the video-sharing site ten days to remove videos of the film, "Innocence of Muslims".

After that, it will face fines of $5,000 a day for every day the clips remain accessible in Brazil.

The case against the controversial film was brought by a Brazilian Muslim group, the National Islamic Union, against Google Inc, the owner of YouTube, for posting on the internet a film it said was offensive and a violation of the constitutional right to freedom of religion.

Miranda said the case juxtaposed freedom of expression and the need to protect individuals or groups of people from action that might incite religious discrimination.

Miranda concluded that banning something illegal should not "offend" freedom of thought and expression, according to the ruling posted online by Estado de S. Paulo newspaper.

It was not the only Brazilian court ruling against Google on Tuesday. Earlier, an elections court ordered the arrest of Google's most senior executive in Brazil after the company failed to take down YouTube videos attacking a local mayoral candidate.

Google is appealing the order, which follows a similar decision by another Brazilian election judge. In that case, a judge found another senior executive responsible for violating local election law. That decision was overturned last week.

The legal challenges underline broader questions about Google's responsibility for content uploaded by third parties to its websites.

Fifteen people were killed in Pakistan during demonstrations over the video on Friday.

People involved in the film, an amateurish 13-minute clip of which was posted on YouTube, have said it was made by a 55-year-old California man, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula.
Clearly the Brazilians too do not understand free speech.

Double Trouble

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
Sad to see so many around the world spit on free speech. Just because a video is offensive to a group of people or to anyone for that matter should not mean that others are not allowed to watch it. I don't understand this idea that people have that their being offended trumps the right of others to watch or hear what they want.


Feb 5, 2011
Too bad Google doesn't actually "do no evil" in which case they'd tell Brazil to gtfo and take their ball and go home. Shut it all down. Any IP out of Brazil no more google for you.


Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2005
Too bad Google doesn't actually "do no evil" in which case they'd tell Brazil to gtfo and take their ball and go home. Shut it all down. Any IP out of Brazil no more google for you.
Not open for further replies.