Bourne Supremacy --- does it suck?

[njmodi]

What shaky cam? The first and second were both good movies IMHO. The first was better.

 

[Modeps]

Shaky cam was turrible. Specially due to the fact I was in a packed theatre and quite close to the screen 🙁 :barf;

 

[captains]

Originally posted by: screwd01
No dark scenes for me and the shaky cam thing wasn't a problem....i thought it was better than the first

 

[DrPizza]

cam thing didn't bother me.

 

[EngenZerO]

i thought the movie was excellent

 

[Brutuskend]

Yes it SUCKED, but not for the stated reason.
Having read the book it pisses me off that the movie has NO SIMILARITY to the novel at ALL!

 

[0roo0roo]

indifferent about both. they were technically competent. but i can't say i really cared after.

 

[Nikamichi]

Originally posted by: Modeps
Shaky cam was turrible. Specially due to the fact I was in a packed theatre and quite close to the screen 🙁 :barf;

Shaky cam > Modeps

:evil:

 

[IAteYourMother]

Originally posted by: ohtwell
I thought it was really good. 🙂


: ) Amanda

 

[tfinch2]

It is the best action movies I've seen since the first one. 🙂

 

[knyghtbyte]

both the bourne films are very good, for different reasons........

shaky cam? well it didnt spoil the film for me as i dont even remember noticing it, i guess it worked well for me..lol

my favourite bit........*minor spoiler warning*





.




.


.

.

.
...is when he is on the roof with his scope watching the FBI/CIA types in the building, and the head woman is on the phone to bourne, saying 'what if we cant find her' or words to that effect...and bourne says 'shouldnt be too hard, your looking at her'.....hehe, brilliantly done, some quite good face acting too there....you just sit there in your chair watching thinking, PWNED!!!!....hehe

 

[JDub02]

I liked it. No problems here with dark scenes or shaky cam.

Watched it on my 52" RCA