okay, I'm at work, away from a TV. cnn.com has sketchy details, someone help me here. cnn.com seems to indicate that the US supreme court just basically said there are constitutional probs with what you did, heres the case again, come up with some state-wide standards for recounts, and go ahead and recount?
yet it seems in this thread that the ruling from the court was basically exactly what bush was looking for.
don't get me wrong, I think gore is a bloodsucking liberal mental case, and I'm behind bush 100%..