Bounced back to Florida.

Feisters

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
577
0
0
I think it's pretty evident that the U.S. Supreme Court doesn't want anything to do with this. Oh well, I'm going to get on with life.

 

Lord Evermore

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
9,558
0
76
You're implying that the final result would actually have any real affect on your life if Florida wasn't in contention?
 

PG

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 1999
3,426
44
91
The title of this thread should really be "Smackdown #2"


 

Feisters

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
577
0
0
My life has nothing to do with the outcome of this "election". I can wait four more years.
 

MrChicken

Senior member
Feb 18, 2000
844
0
0
Now that they have had a few more minutes to read it, they are saying that basically Gore is done, it's over.
 

Feisters

Senior member
Oct 9, 1999
577
0
0
"Smackdown #2" LOL! The U.S. Supreme Court has done nothing more than to choose to NOT deal with it. Which really, as it should be.
 

ToBeMe

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2000
5,711
0
0
  • The U.S. Supreme Court late Tuesday remanded the Florida recount case back to that state's Supreme Court, which means no recounting of ballots can resume any time soon.

    Seven justices said they saw constitutional problems with the Florida Supreme Court's recount order.

    The justices had heard oral arguments from both sides Monday. Democrat Al Gore sought the resumption of a hand recount authorized by the Florida Supreme Court last Friday but suspended the next day by the U.S. Supreme Court. Republican George W. Bush wants no recount.

    At issue are more than 40,000 "undervotes" -- those where machines could not detect a vote for president. Although Bush is the certified winner in Florida, his 537-vote lead had eroded to less than 200 votes before the hand recount was halted on Saturday.

<< The U.S. Supreme Court has reversed the Florida Supreme Court's ruling ordering a statewide recount of undervotes in the presidential election and sent it back to the lower court, asking the Florida court to craft a statewide standard to count the votes or use the machine count totals. The George W. Bush campaign had asked the court to throw out manually recounted votes. Al Gore's campaign wants the recount to go ahead >>

 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Even if the court said Gore should be shot, CNN would say something positive in Gore's favor. They have to be the most biased liberal network on TV.

From abcnews.com:

A sharply divided U.S. Supreme Court dealt an apparent death blow to Al Gore?s presidential hopes by ruling in favor of George W. Bush. The court reversed an order from the Florida Supreme Court.
 

Total Refected Power

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 1999
3,899
0
0
Yup its over.

Really weird. A recount would have been allowed according to the Supreme Court but had to be completed properly by Dec.12. Doh!!!!!!!!

This will really piss people off. Talking out of both sides of their mouth.

I was for Bush but the Supreme Court ruling is ridiculous.
 

JellyBaby

Diamond Member
Apr 21, 2000
9,159
1
81
The 2000 election might be over but key issues remain, namely how to better interface voters with vote-taking equipment, vague laws, and that pesky manual recounting standard. FL has a couple of years before the next series of elections...lets see what they can do in that time. We'll be watching our own states, too.
 

ToBeMe

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2000
5,711
0
0
Upon reading over the ruling it appears that the USSC has laid down such stringent restrictions has to leave the possibility of a future recount but it will have to be argued, and strict standars set forth before any count begins. Further, it reads in the interim the Certification is upheld.........Bush wins?
 

Valhalla1

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 1999
8,678
0
76
okay, I'm at work, away from a TV. cnn.com has sketchy details, someone help me here. cnn.com seems to indicate that the US supreme court just basically said there are constitutional probs with what you did, heres the case again, come up with some state-wide standards for recounts, and go ahead and recount?

yet it seems in this thread that the ruling from the court was basically exactly what bush was looking for.

don't get me wrong, I think gore is a bloodsucking liberal mental case, and I'm behind bush 100%..
 

etech

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,597
0
0
This is what I understand so far.

The USSC said that the different and unfair ways of counting dimpled,pregent or hanging chads was untenable and that the Florida SC should of rectified that problem earlier.

The Florida SC has already established that Dec. 12th was the deadline for picking the electors. The electors picked by that day must stand.

Gov. Bush will be President Elect Bush.



Tripleshot stay away from my backside.
 

Valhalla1

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 1999
8,678
0
76
I see..

what a cop-out ruling by the USSC. :( I was hoping they would just wipe the floor with the activist liberal bastard florida SC.

TripleShot - you do know that threatening the president is a severe crime, don't you? :Q
 

Tiger

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,312
0
0
It is finally over.

It seems that 7 of the 9 found equal protection flaws in the FSC decision and, 5 of those 7, the majority opinion, reversed citing equal protection and other flaws, especially 3 U.S.C. 5.
Only 2 justices found nothing wrong with how the FSC ruled.
Now we'll see what the Vice President is made of. It seems that the DNC has asked the VP not to concede until the 18th so that they have some time to &quot;approach&quot; some electoral college electors about jumping ship.

 

JellyBaby

Diamond Member
Apr 21, 2000
9,159
1
81
Just heard that the head of the democratic national committee is calling for Gore to concede! Ouch. :)
 

Valhalla1

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 1999
8,678
0
76
if gore accepts the presidency because the democratic national committee bribes some republican electors...

surely even Gore isn't that fuc#ing dirty. talk about watching your back while in office...
 

Valhalla1

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 1999
8,678
0
76
okay, we got conflicting opinions here, 1 says DNC tells Gore not to concede yet, 1 says the DNC tells gore to concede?
 

Pennstate

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 1999
3,211
0
0
What a bunch of WIMPS If you can't take the heat, don't jump into the pot in the first place.