• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Bought a Nikon D3100 refurb... What to do next? - Updated

Good day, fellow ATers.

I bought the camera last night off of ebay from adorama for $305. It is for my wife as her film SLR's all died out. It comes with with 18/55mm VR lens.

I'm looking for a nice shoulder bag, preferable VERY low cost. Also, do I need to buy her a neck strap? I think she tossed hers with her cameras. I already have several 16GB UHS-1 CL10 SD cards for it. Would investing in a second battery be useful? Is there anything I need to watch out for?

Thanks in advance!
 
The Lowepro Passport Sling is a great, low cost bag that doesn't scream "camera bag". It's got protection for the camera plus lens attached and room for one more lens. I recommend you check it out.

The neck strap is definitely worth replacing if you think she'll have the camera hanging off her neck for extended periods of time. I've found that if you use a sling-type of bag that you don't use the neck strap that often since you can just keep the camera in the bag when you're not snapping a shot. Thicker, more comfortable straps come at the cost of more bulk hanging off your camera. I personally like to have a comfortable strap on my camera, but my wife's D5100 has had the stock strap on it since Day 1 and she hasn't complained. I've even asked her if she wanted me to get her a new strap, and she was indifferent at the thought of it.

We've discussed the need for a second battery in the past on this forum. Most people will say a second battery is a must. I completely disagree with that. As long as you are good about charging the battery before long shoots, a second battery is not necessary at all. It can be useful for people who go camping or go to places that don't have access to power to charge overnight. I've NEVER run out of juice while shooting for very long periods of time, but I'm also very good about charging the battery whenever I've used it extensively.

Edit: The battery should last over 500 shots per charge. You can gauge your needs based on this. 500 is really conservative too, but even thinking about taking 500 shots in one shooting session is pretty ridiculous.

You should pick up the 35mm 1.8G prime lens. It's basically the sharpest lens you can buy for that camera while also being the most affordable. Because of the very large aperture, this is the lens that will offer that blurred out background that all new dslr users covet. The large aperture also offers great low-light night performance (the 18-55 will suffer indoors without a ton of bright lights on).
 
Last edited:
Just start shooting, if you feel you need a extra battery then buy it but it's not a necessity.

If you are to spend extra cash then

+1 35mm F/1.8 prime lens.
 
Batteries in SLR's last a long time.

+2 on the 35mm f1.8 - didn't take it off my camera the first year i owned it.
 
Is it good enough? Sure. It is a slow lens though. If you want to shoot any low light images you'll want at least one fast lens with an aperture of 1.8-2.8.

I think you should use the lens you have though until you realize your needs yourself. You might find that your interest lies more in telephoto photography rather than low light photography. You might find that you really need a fantastic portrait lens and want to get something better than the 35mm. Maybe macro. Get my point? Wait until there's an actual need.
 
That lens is $200 everywhere... Which is 66% of the price of the camera!

Is the 18-55 good enough for clean outdoor photos?

Yes, it's good enough. I'm not sure how "into" photography your wife is, but it may be perfectly fine depending on her skill level and know-how. Not the best by far but not bad.

As for the 35mm/1.8, I just got mine a couple of days ago. Going to go ahead and say...+4. 🙂
 
It's really about how and what you shoot when you consider upgrading from the kit zoom lens so many of us start with. Personally, I'd take the 18-55 over the 35/1.8 if I only had one lens. The versatility of the zoom outweighs the extra image quality and wider max aperture of the 35mm for everyday shooting, IMHO.

I'd go slow on upgrading lenses or buying accessories until you understand what you want and why you need it. The kit wide zoom lenses, both Nikon and Canon, are fantastic deals and for most non-enthusiasts it's all the lens they will ever need.
 
Last edited:
Just messing with it thus far. My wife (understandably) has a much better grasp on it. I typically leave it on auto-focus.

rz7vO1g.jpg


YfABxCr.jpg


vrnT6MK.jpg


hiRuBBm.jpg


oJlik4F.jpg


sqWDDA3.jpg


I just bought two accessories on Amazon. Are they worth my time?

Neewer 0.45x 52mm Wide Angle Lens with Macro $12.57 prime

PLR Optics 52MM +1 +2 +4 +10 Close-Up Macro Filter Set with Pouch $14.25 prime

Let me know your opinions...
 
You should consider an ND Fader. Always nice to have so you can control light without changing your aperture/iso/shutter speed. I bought a cheap one ($15), but its so useful I get a better one for my next camera.
 
Yeah, I think all the faders under $30 are made by the same company in China, but they all get the job done. This will help in large scene photographs, because you can adjust the light so you can get definition in clouds without underexposing everything else. For example, the sky will show up as all white, unless you spend time to tweak exposure. I mainly use it for video, so if she is using auto settings for photos it might not matter as much. But for $15, its nice to have in your bag.
 
So, pretty much this?

http://www.amazon.com/PLR-Multi-Coat.../dp/B008BLRK62

Or this for $12

http://www.amazon.com/camera-photo/dp/B006YMATJA

I bought the other two as mini-gifts for the wife, as ALL she takes are close-ups and large scene photographs. This adjusts light balances?
ND (Neutral Density) filters is a great tool to control depth of field (shallow depth of field) and shutter speed (water movement and video), however your wife will not have the use for ND filter since she will want to maximize depth of field and shutter speed for macro/closeup, and perhaps landscape photos with out the use of a tripod.

IMHO, she will have more use for a good polarizer filter, and perhaps a graduated gray or ND filter.
 
I'm not a fan of 18-55. Generally, IMO you can do the whole wide shot thing with an iphone camera just fine. It's the reach and low-light capability which defines a DSLR, at least for me, and typically 18-55 kit lenses are pretty lousy at both.

One neat thing is that Nikon DSLR's are also compatible with vintage Nikon lenses. So you can use like a MF Nikon lens from the 70's and 80's on your camera, which is nice.
 
As an update, here's some shots I've taken since updating last. I'm learning quickly on perspective and lighting.

z7GoUn5.jpg


vahVn76.jpg


zaYaKJs.jpg


fsnxJRH.jpg


The wife took the camera and snapped a picture of me!
uBSiBWo.jpg


TCoK7VF.jpg


DsBWARz.jpg


2dpknEa.jpg


8jNLIJY.jpg


MSJPewy.jpg
 
Last edited:
5nIEjWJ.jpg


ZIUXX4B.jpg


This train was easily going 35mph while I was traveling 50mph in the opposite direction. I didn't think it'd get such a fast moving target.
oQTmLEo.jpg


WNT4kMh.jpg


u3t7Lub.jpg


Io4hTPH.jpg


igkbsA8.jpg


aSYr7CP.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top