bottleneck on GeForce 2 MX200's

Battousai1

Member
Sep 7, 2001
139
0
0
whats with the GF2 MX200? people say this is the crappiest card nvidia ever made on the MX line right? also in my own experience when using high resolution settings i.e. higher than 800 X 600 graphic speed becomes choppy, but the question is what makes the GF2 MX200 a crap card? is it beacuse of the GPU? the speed? btw is the GPU of the MX200's different from any GF2's? I read that MX200's has lower clock frequencies compared to MX400's, will overclocking do some performance boost up? and would it be safe using "Coolbits"?
 

Haden

Senior member
Nov 21, 2001
578
0
0
Yes you can overlock it using coolbits, just don't push "Core Clock" (you won't see any improvement), but rather overclock
"Memory clock". Test using some game, if you pushed it too far you'll notice some random points.
There is nice utility too check maximum overclock cards memory can stand : TestVRam(http://testvram.nm.ru).
 

cool

Senior member
Jun 17, 2000
413
0
0


<< 64 bit memory bus? how about the GPU? is the GPU different from any GeForce 2 cards? >>



AFAIK, it's not.
 

Battousai1

Member
Sep 7, 2001
139
0
0
ey btw whats the password on testvram winzip file cant extract it cause i need a password to open the zip file thnx
 

rogue1979

Diamond Member
Mar 14, 2001
3,062
0
0
Yes, there is a difference in chipset architecture. The GTS/Pro/Ultra has 4 pixel pipelines, the MX only has 2.