Was it ever like this for any of you in other states?
Well I am speaking for my wife but: Yes.
It could be worse - a lot of her tests were only based on district decisions and those had some serious flaws, especially considering they constituted a good chunk of your performance rating (which determined class schedule, how much your pay got cut [pay raises? What are those?] and if you got fired when they cut more teacher positions)
1) No accommodations were made for Special Needs students for the district tests. Since this had no effect on their overall grade there was some loophole they exploited to get around having to do this. Unfortunately they heavily concentrate special needs students in large co-taught classes. So my wife and her math co-taught classes were used in direct competency comparisons to her cohorts who had smaller classes with next to no special needs kids
2) No penalty for not taking the test for the kids but the teacher is given a 0 score for that student. Her school already suffers from very poor attendance so the teachers were absolutely shocked when the standardized test day had so few students it didn't end up counting as a school day. Tests were still scored though.
Fortunately she left that train wreck and is now much happier at a much better school district. The twice a year assessments do seem to be becoming more common in Michigan but the new district does not do that. There is still the MME testing, more time intensive, MDE which will require an unspecified number of 'interim' assessments though. There might be some implementation of Common Core but the legislature is still arguing over that