- Sep 25, 2001
- 29,391
- 2,738
- 126
Originally posted by: quakefiend420
because hollywood likes beating dead horses for a little more pocket change
and people are dumb enough to go see whatever crap they churn out
/thread
It's violent (the original version was rated NC-17 I think, then recut to get an R-rating), silly, and ludacris at times, so basicly it's an action movie that not too many people have seen.Originally posted by: secretanchitman
never saw the first one. how is it btw?
Originally posted by: MrBond
I remember when I saw the first Boondock Saints almost two years ago, I saw something about the sequal on IMBD. This movie has been classified as "in-production" for a long time.
Besides, didn't the director do something to REALLY piss off Miramax?
