Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
If you were discussing the book, why'd you say "film" in the original post?
no,
we were discussing the film,
he brought up the book.
I can see where you'd get that Verhoeven's subtext seems to fall away after the start of the movie, until the very end where the recruitment-film aspect reappears, but I felt that it was still there, just very subtle. I'd have to watch it again to point out the little clues he gives that he's not really glorifying war the way he appears to be.
He's always used violence to make his points about human nature, especially in RoboCop and Flesh + Blood. I'd argue that it only seems excessive and gratuitous but that's open to debate. Not tonight though, time for some sleep.