News Bombshell: Intel-Nvidia partnership may kill Arc GPU

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Tup3x

Golden Member
Dec 31, 2016
1,300
1,438
136
So this is just going to further the quasi-monopoly that Intel and nvidia have in the laptop market? Very interesting that this development is happening right as AMD is preparing Zen6/RDNA5 APUs, which places it in a good competitive position for the first time ever in mid-range and high-end gaming/creator laptops.
That's probably pretty much what NVIDIA is after. It's pretty obvious that discrete GPUs for laptops (as in traditional way, with their own dedicated VRAM) are dead. It's easier to sell laptop with GeForce than other GPU and Intel knows that.
 
Jul 27, 2020
28,173
19,208
146
It's easier to sell laptop with GeForce than other GPU and Intel knows that.
It's sad that Intel gave up without a fight. I could see 16 and 17 inch laptops with 275HX and B580 12GB desktop chip with great cooling making good financial sense against Nvidia's crappy 8GB mobile parts.
 

marees

Platinum Member
Apr 28, 2024
2,189
2,834
96
So this is just going to further the quasi-monopoly that Intel and nvidia have in the laptop market? Very interesting that this development is happening right as AMD is preparing Zen6/RDNA5 APUs, which places it in a good competitive position for the first time ever in mid-range and high-end gaming/creator laptops.
What MLID was also saying.
 
Jul 27, 2020
28,173
19,208
146
@adroc_thurston What will be AMD's response?

What I see in my mind: Lisa Su shrugs and says to her people, "I never cared about tiny GPUs anyway. Back to work making those MIxxx monsters!".
 

Keller_TT

Member
Jun 2, 2024
161
198
76
Wouldn't 3xR9700 32GB be better?
I thought about it, but it didn't tally. I don't require it for LLM inferencing or quantizing very large multimodal/purpose-built models for which I have the Tenstorrent box. Also, the W9700 was still an unknown quantity.

In my case, RDNA4 would only have made sense if I needed INT4 quantization where it is vastly superior. But this build is specifically for rasterized compute on FP16, BF16 workloads and predominantly requires high bandwidth and VRAM for pose estimation, 3D Mocap, and short animated renders with high FPS. 864 GB/s with 48 GB VRAM per card means larger batch sizes, speed and accuracy without compromise/workarounds. Works great with ROCm and Pro Render. It will thump the W9700 in this case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: igor_kavinski