Bomb at luxury hotel in Pakistan kills at least 11

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,155
14,588
146
Hopefully this isn't a repost. I searched, but...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200...p_on_re_as/as_pakistan

PESHAWAR, Pakistan ? Suicide attackers shot their way past guards and set off a massive blast Tuesday outside a luxury hotel where foreigners and well-to-do Pakistanis mixed, killing at least 11 people and wounding 70, officials said. The bombers struck the Pearl Continental Hotel at about 10 p.m., when nightlife was still in swing. The attack reduced a section of the hotel to concrete rubble and twisted steel and left a huge crater in a parking lot.

The blast came a week after Taliban leaders warned they would carry out major attacks in large cities in retaliation for an army offensive to reclaim the nearby Swat Valley region from the militants. No claim surfaced immediately for the bombing in Peshawar, the northwest's largest city with about 2.2 million people.

Earlier in the day, officials said Pakistan's military engaged militants on two fronts elsewhere in the northwest. The army dispatched helicopter gunships in support of citizens fighting the Taliban in one district and used artillery fire against militants in another after sympathetic tribal elders refused to hand them over.

Neither operation was anywhere near the size of the military's offensive in the Swat Valley, where 15,000 troops have battled up to 7,000 Taliban fighters.

But the battles Monday and Tuesday in the Upper Dir and Bannu districts suggest that pockets of pro-Taliban sentiment remain strong in some areas, while the militants' form of hardline Islam is unpalatable in others ? particularly because of the violence the militants have used to enforce it.

Peshawar lies in between the two districts. The Pearl Continental, affectionately called the "PC" by Pakistanis, overlooks a golf course and a historic fort. The ritziest hotel in the city, it is relatively well-guarded and set far back from the main road.

Police official Liaqat Ali said witnesses gave vivid accounts of how the bombers carried out their attack.

Three men in a pickup truck approached the hotel's main gate, opened fire at security guards, drove inside and detonated the bomb close to the building, Ali said. A senior police officer, Shafqatullah Malik, estimated it contained more than half a ton of explosives.

The chaotic scene echoed a bombing last year at Islamabad's Marriott Hotel that killed more than 50 people. Both hotels were favored places for foreigners and elite Pakistanis to stay and socialize, making them high-profile targets for militants despite tight security.

The method of attack also matched a May 27 assault on buildings belonging to police and a regional headquarters of Pakistan's top intelligence agency in the eastern city of Lahore, for which the Taliban claimed responsibility. A small group opened fire on security guards to get through a guard post, then detonated an explosive-laden van.

In Washington, two senior U.S. officials said the State Department had been in negotiations with the hotel's owners to either purchase or sign a long-term lease to the facility to house a new American consulate in Peshawar. The officials said they were not aware of any sign that U.S. interest in the compound had played a role in its being targeted.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the negotiations were not public and had not been completed. They said no immediate decision had been made on whether to go ahead with plans to base the consulate on the hotel grounds.

Lou Fintor, spokesman for the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad, said there were no immediate reports of American casualties.

North West Frontier Province Information Minister Mian Iftikhar Hussain told The Associated Press early Wednesday that officials were reporting 11 deaths in the blast. Other police and government officials could confirm only five dead.

An AP reporter saw six wounded foreigners being helped out of the Pearl.

The U.N. identified a staff member as among the dead: Aleksandar Vorkapic, 44, an information technology specialist from Belgrade, Serbia, who was part of an emergency team from the office of U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees helping with the crisis.

Peshawar district coordination officer Sahibzada Anis said the blast wounded three others working for the U.N. agency ? a Briton, a Somali and a German.

Amjad Jamal, spokesman for the World Food Program in Pakistan, said more than 25 U.N. workers were staying at the hotel. He said all seven WFP workers were safe.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon condemned the "heinous terrorist attack" in "the strongest possible terms," U.N. deputy spokeswoman Marie Okabe said at U.N. headquarters in New York.

"Once again, a dedicated staff member of the United Nations is among the victims of a heinous terrorist attack which no cause can justify," Okabe said.

She said Ban was "saddened by the large numbers of dead and wounded" and extends his condolences to the families of the victims and to the government and people of Pakistan.

Dr. Khizar Hayat at Lady Reading Hospital said the hospital received some 70 wounded people, with at least nine in critical condition.

Farahnaz Ispahani, spokeswoman for President Asif Ali Zardari and the ruling party, condemned the attackers.

"We will not be cowed by these people," she said. "We will root them out, we will fight them and we will win. This is Pakistan's unity and integrity that is at stake."

The military offensive in Swat and surrounding districts began in late April, and officials have blamed a handful of suicide attacks on Taliban attempts to seek revenge.

U.S. officials would like Pakistan to launch an operation in the nearby South Waziristan tribal region, the main base for Pakistani Taliban chief Baitullah Mehsud. The government has announced no plans to attack the area, where al-Qaida fighters also are believed to be operating.

A new operation started Tuesday in Jani Khel, a semiautonomous region in Bannu bordering North Waziristan, another Taliban stronghold, after the government imposed an indefinite curfew, said Kamran Zeb Khan, coordination officer for the Bannu district.

He told the AP that the operation, backed by artillery, was launched after tribal elders failed to meet a Monday deadline to expel or hand over militants believed responsible for a mass kidnapping last week of students who were later released.

Pakistan's military would not confirm that any operation had begun.

The other fighting took place next to the Swat Valley in the Upper Dir district, where helicopter gunships arrived to support a citizens' militia battling some 200 Taliban fighters.

The militia, called a lashkar, sprang up over the weekend to avenge a suicide bombing that killed 33 people at a mosque. Officials say the Taliban carried out the bombing because local tribesmen resisted their moving into the area.

"In Upper Dir, as you are seeing, a lashkar has risen, people have stood up. God willing, the situation will soon improve there," legislator Najmuddin Malik said while visiting a refugee camp in Peshawar.

The militia's numbers have steadily risen to more than 2,000, with residents of two villages and a town joining them Tuesday as they surrounded the Taliban in tough terrain, area police official Atlas Khan said. His report could not be independently confirmed because media access to the conflict zone has been restricted to military-escorted junkets.

A tribal elder said villagers won't go home until the militants are gone ? one way or another.

"We are out on a mission to kill or flush out all the Taliban," Malik Motabar Khan told AP by phone from the village of Ghazi Gay. "We will stay here until we kill all of them."


OK, I really doubt this is Indian reprisal for the hotel attack last year...but I wouldn't put it past them. These two countries just can't seem to stop fucking with each other...
IMO, this is the kind of stuff that happens when a country can't control its borders, when it "permits" warlords to rule large portions of a country. when it gets "friendly" with known terrorist groups like the Taliban.

EDIT: Fixed so even a moron should be able to tell the difference between the original article (as previously sectioned off with " " marks) and my comments.


Thread locked because it has veered from the discussion on the topic into a personal pissing match over nationalities.

Anandtech Senior moderator
Red Dawn
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
99.9% certain, this is simple a Taliban based and carried out attack and India has nothing to do with it.

Because the Pakistani army is quite serious about ending Taliban control of its tribal regions, the army offensives in the Swat region(s) has been effective in keeping the Taliban on the run for months now. And because the Taliban is outclassed, weapons wise, there is little way for the Taliban to strike back. But the Taliban have publically stated they would use terrorist attacks in the cities as a way of striking back. And now it looks like they have, in this case.

But given the tensions between India and Pakistan, on either side of the border, if anything bad happens, and depending which side of the border, someone will scream India or Pakistan is behind this and people will want to believe its true.
 

DesiPower

Lifer
Nov 22, 2008
15,299
740
126
Ok so you pasted the yahoo article and then added the last paragraph with your worthless comments, you tried to make it look like RIAZ KHAN, the author of the article in yahoo wrote it.
I am not sure of your nationality but it sure shows you hostile and hatred filled feeling towards India. India has no interest in these petty acts, India is a much bigger and greater country than that. Of course someone born in Pakistan will never understand it, someone from a country which never had a stable democratically elected govt or basic freedoms will never understand India.
I recommend you keep your frustration about your identity out of here.
 

Whitecloak

Diamond Member
May 4, 2001
6,074
2
0
Originally posted by: DesiPower
Ok so you pasted the yahoo article and then added the last paragraph with your worthless comments, you tried to make it look like RIAZ KHAN, the author of the article in yahoo wrote it.
I am not sure of your nationality but it sure shows you hostile and hatred filled feeling towards India. India has no interest in these petty acts, India is a much bigger and greater country than that. Of course someone born in Pakistan will never understand it, someone from a country which never had a stable democratically elected govt or basic freedoms will never understand India.
I recommend you keep your frustration about your identity out of here.

do not feed the trolls.
 

crisscross

Golden Member
Apr 29, 2001
1,598
0
71
Yeah you don't think India did it, but just thought you would lay it out there didn't you? how thoughtful.. idiot
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,155
14,588
146
Originally posted by: DesiPower
Ok so you pasted the yahoo article and then added the last paragraph with your worthless comments, you tried to make it look like RIAZ KHAN, the author of the article in yahoo wrote it.
I am not sure of your nationality but it sure shows you hostile and hatred filled feeling towards India. India has no interest in these petty acts, India is a much bigger and greater country than that. Of course someone born in Pakistan will never understand it, someone from a country which never had a stable democratically elected govt or basic freedoms will never understand India.
I recommend you keep your frustration about your identity out of here.


40,000 comedians out of work...and you're trying to become one? Gotta work on your routine I think.

There was NO intent to mix my comments with the original article. Anyone with half a clue would have been able to tell that the parts " text" was the quote from the original article...and even if the reader was too blind to see thatm I DID link to the original article...

From where I stand, as a native-born American, there's not much difference between Indian and Pakistani. BOTH groups seem to have little interest in getting along...as is evidenced by the constant turmoil in the region...in fact, if memory serves me right, it wasn't too long ago, both were part of ONE country...which the British fucked up with their colonialism.

My mention of "Indian Revenge" was intended more to generate discussion about the difficulties between the two nations than as an actual probablility...but morons like you missed the point...(no surprise there)

I DO believe that this was a Taliban attack...but also think that things like this are to be expected in a region that permits the existance of Warlords who are above the law....and who make their own laws.
 
Apr 17, 2005
13,465
3
81
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Originally posted by: DesiPower
Ok so you pasted the yahoo article and then added the last paragraph with your worthless comments, you tried to make it look like RIAZ KHAN, the author of the article in yahoo wrote it.
I am not sure of your nationality but it sure shows you hostile and hatred filled feeling towards India. India has no interest in these petty acts, India is a much bigger and greater country than that. Of course someone born in Pakistan will never understand it, someone from a country which never had a stable democratically elected govt or basic freedoms will never understand India.
I recommend you keep your frustration about your identity out of here.


40,000 comedians out of work...and you're trying to become one? Gotta work on your routine I think.

There was NO intent to mix my comments with the original article. Anyone with half a clue would have been able to tell that the parts " text" was the quote from the original article...and even if the reader was too blind to see thatm I DID link to the original article...

From where I stand, as a native-born American, there's not much difference between Indian and Pakistani. BOTH groups seem to have little interest in getting along...as is evidenced by the constant turmoil in the region...in fact, if memory serves me right, it wasn't too long ago, both were part of ONE country...which the British fucked up with their colonialism.

My mention of "Indian Revenge" was intended more to generate discussion about the difficulties between the two nations than as an actual probablility...but morons like you missed the point...(no surprise there)

I DO believe that this was a Taliban attack...but also think that things like this are to be expected in a region that permits the existance of Warlords who are above the law....and who make their own laws.

lol, we're the same race...aside from that, we don't have much in common.
 

Whitecloak

Diamond Member
May 4, 2001
6,074
2
0
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Originally posted by: DesiPower
Ok so you pasted the yahoo article and then added the last paragraph with your worthless comments, you tried to make it look like RIAZ KHAN, the author of the article in yahoo wrote it.
I am not sure of your nationality but it sure shows you hostile and hatred filled feeling towards India. India has no interest in these petty acts, India is a much bigger and greater country than that. Of course someone born in Pakistan will never understand it, someone from a country which never had a stable democratically elected govt or basic freedoms will never understand India.
I recommend you keep your frustration about your identity out of here.


40,000 comedians out of work...and you're trying to become one? Gotta work on your routine I think.

There was NO intent to mix my comments with the original article. Anyone with half a clue would have been able to tell that the parts " text" was the quote from the original article...and even if the reader was too blind to see thatm I DID link to the original article...

From where I stand, as a native-born American, there's not much difference between Indian and Pakistani. BOTH groups seem to have little interest in getting along...as is evidenced by the constant turmoil in the region...in fact, if memory serves me right, it wasn't too long ago, both were part of ONE country...which the British fucked up with their colonialism.

My mention of "Indian Revenge" was intended more to generate discussion about the difficulties between the two nations than as an actual probablility...but morons like you missed the point...(no surprise there)

I DO believe that this was a Taliban attack...but also think that things like this are to be expected in a region that permits the existance of Warlords who are above the law....and who make their own laws.

so you dont know anything about the subcontinent but you want to stir shit up.
 

tvarad

Golden Member
Jun 25, 2001
1,130
0
0
Originally posted by: BoomerD
....

From where I stand, as a native-born American, there's not much difference between Indian and Pakistani. BOTH groups seem to have little interest in getting along...as is evidenced by the constant turmoil in the region...in fact, if memory serves me right, it wasn't too long ago, both were part of ONE country...which the British fucked up with their colonialism.

My mention of "Indian Revenge" was intended more to generate discussion about the difficulties between the two nations than as an actual probablility...but morons like you missed the point...(no surprise there)

....

What a clueless moron. If anyone has fvcked up the sub-continent, it is the Americans who armed the Pakistani Generals to the teeth while they played their war games at the expense of governance and looked the other way while they procured nukes and exported them to North Korea in return for Long-Dong-Bong missiles with the largesse of Saudi oil money. And all these countries are now tinder-boxes threatening to set the world on fire (if they haven't already, that is).

For all their faults, the British did put in a solid bureaucracy, railroads, a modern educational system and a parliamentary system of governance where people were once owned by feudal kings, queens and satraps. The Americans on the other hand have given the sub-continent Al-Qaeda, Taliban, madrassas and other medieval influences where they were once minimal or non-existent, just because they wanted to keep the Soviet Union in check.

Sheesh!
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,155
14,588
146
Originally posted by: tvarad
What a clueless moron. If anyone has fvcked up the sub-continent, it is the Americans who armed the Pakistani Generals to the teeth while they played their war games at the expense of governance and looked the other way while they procured nukes and exported them to North Korea in return for Long-Dong-Bong missiles with the largesse of Saudi oil money. And all these countries are now tinder-boxes threatening to set the world on fire (if they haven't already, that is).

For all their faults, the British did put in a solid bureaucracy, railroads, a modern educational system and a parliamentary system of governance where people were once owned by feudal kings, queens and satraps. The Americans on the other hand have given the sub-continent Al-Qaeda, Taliban, madrassas and other medieval influences where they were once minimal or non-existent, just because they wanted to keep the Soviet Union in check.

Sheesh!

Blame the Americans for your problems. Typical 3rd world thinking.
 

Whitecloak

Diamond Member
May 4, 2001
6,074
2
0
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Originally posted by: tvarad
What a clueless moron. If anyone has fvcked up the sub-continent, it is the Americans who armed the Pakistani Generals to the teeth while they played their war games at the expense of governance and looked the other way while they procured nukes and exported them to North Korea in return for Long-Dong-Bong missiles with the largesse of Saudi oil money. And all these countries are now tinder-boxes threatening to set the world on fire (if they haven't already, that is).

For all their faults, the British did put in a solid bureaucracy, railroads, a modern educational system and a parliamentary system of governance where people were once owned by feudal kings, queens and satraps. The Americans on the other hand have given the sub-continent Al-Qaeda, Taliban, madrassas and other medieval influences where they were once minimal or non-existent, just because they wanted to keep the Soviet Union in check.

Sheesh!

Blame the Americans for your problems. Typical 3rd world thinking.

awesome! the more you post, the more you dig yourself in.
 

tvarad

Golden Member
Jun 25, 2001
1,130
0
0
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Originally posted by: tvarad
What a clueless moron. If anyone has fvcked up the sub-continent, it is the Americans who armed the Pakistani Generals to the teeth while they played their war games at the expense of governance and looked the other way while they procured nukes and exported them to North Korea in return for Long-Dong-Bong missiles with the largesse of Saudi oil money. And all these countries are now tinder-boxes threatening to set the world on fire (if they haven't already, that is).

For all their faults, the British did put in a solid bureaucracy, railroads, a modern educational system and a parliamentary system of governance where people were once owned by feudal kings, queens and satraps. The Americans on the other hand have given the sub-continent Al-Qaeda, Taliban, madrassas and other medieval influences where they were once minimal or non-existent, just because they wanted to keep the Soviet Union in check.

Sheesh!

Blame the Americans for your problems. Typical 3rd world thinking.

Only a fake American like you would trumpet your origins so loudly and the innuendo implied in the topic summary should have tipped me off as to your beloved patriot origins. Should have figured it. My bad.
 

ranmaniac

Golden Member
May 14, 2001
1,940
0
76
Originally posted by: tvarad
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Originally posted by: tvarad
What a clueless moron. If anyone has fvcked up the sub-continent, it is the Americans who armed the Pakistani Generals to the teeth while they played their war games at the expense of governance and looked the other way while they procured nukes and exported them to North Korea in return for Long-Dong-Bong missiles with the largesse of Saudi oil money. And all these countries are now tinder-boxes threatening to set the world on fire (if they haven't already, that is).

For all their faults, the British did put in a solid bureaucracy, railroads, a modern educational system and a parliamentary system of governance where people were once owned by feudal kings, queens and satraps. The Americans on the other hand have given the sub-continent Al-Qaeda, Taliban, madrassas and other medieval influences where they were once minimal or non-existent, just because they wanted to keep the Soviet Union in check.

Sheesh!

Blame the Americans for your problems. Typical 3rd world thinking.

Only a fake American like you would trumpet your origins so loudly and the innuendo implied in the topic summary should have tipped me off as to your beloved patriot origins. Should have figured it. My bad.

I guess that cow urine soft drink finally made you paranoid. You think Boomer D is Pakistani, have you seen his pic on ATOT? :laugh:
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,155
14,588
146
Originally posted by: ranmaniac
I guess that cow urine soft drink finally made you paranoid. You think Boomer D is Pakistani, have you seen his pic on ATOT? :laugh:

Shhh...dontcha know...I'm an Indian/Pakistani terrerest in disguise! :D

My goal is to stir these groups up enough that they bristle and shake their nukes at each other...again. :p

 

Whitecloak

Diamond Member
May 4, 2001
6,074
2
0
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Originally posted by: ranmaniac
I guess that cow urine soft drink finally made you paranoid. You think Boomer D is Pakistani, have you seen his pic on ATOT? :laugh:

Shhh...dontcha know...I'm an Indian/Pakistani terrerest in disguise! :D

My goal is to stir these groups up enough that they bristle and shake their nukes at each other...again. :p

how noble of you - troll.
 

cirrrocco

Golden Member
Sep 7, 2004
1,952
78
91
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Originally posted by: DesiPower
Ok so you pasted the yahoo article and then added the last paragraph with your worthless comments, you tried to make it look like RIAZ KHAN, the author of the article in yahoo wrote it.
I am not sure of your nationality but it sure shows you hostile and hatred filled feeling towards India. India has no interest in these petty acts, India is a much bigger and greater country than that. Of course someone born in Pakistan will never understand it, someone from a country which never had a stable democratically elected govt or basic freedoms will never understand India.
I recommend you keep your frustration about your identity out of here.




From where I stand, as a native-born german, there's not much difference between american and Cuban. BOTH groups seem to have little interest in getting along...as is evidenced by the constant turmoil in the region...in fact, if memory serves me right, it wasn't too long ago, both were part of ONE country...which the americans fucked up with their jingoism.

........

I DO believe that this was a Taliban attack...but also think that things like this are to be expected in a region that permits the existance of Warlords who are above the law....and who make their own laws.

or how about this


From where I stand, as a native-born german, there's not much difference between american and Al Qaeda [both love their freedumb] . BOTH groups seem to have little interest in getting along...as is evidenced by the constant turmoil in the region...in fact, if memory serves me right, it wasn't too long ago, both were cooperating against the eeeevil soviets.


 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Stay on the thread topic or this will be locked.

tvarad, WhiteCloak & crisscross
tvarad - I also recommend that you enable your PMs so you can be notified by a Moderator if needed.

BoomerD presented the Indian involvement as an option as revenge for the Pakistani involvement of the attack in India. Which is a valid theory - not high on the list, but valid.

And he also posted later within this thread that it was his intent to generate such discussion on who may have been responsible and why


Argue that only; not his nationality.


Senior Anandtech Moderator
Common Courtesy
 

Whitecloak

Diamond Member
May 4, 2001
6,074
2
0
btw, CC, I havent remarked on the OPs nationality just his intelligence and motives. If he is butthurt about that, too bad.
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,155
14,588
146
Originally posted by: Whitecloak
btw, CC, I havent remarked on the OPs nationality just his intelligence and motives. If he is butthurt about that, too bad.

butthurt? Nah, I don't give a shit.

Sounds like it's YOU who's butthurt...

"Oh the big bad man said negative things about our beloved country"

Which, on the world stage, appears to be an overcrowded 3rd world shithole...that has the potential to be a great country...but likely never will because of caste, religious differences, and feudalism.