• Guest, The rules for the P & N subforum have been updated to prohibit "ad hominem" or personal attacks against other posters. See the full details in the post "Politics and News Rules & Guidelines."

Boinc on Mac?

StefanR5R

Elite Member
Dec 10, 2016
4,077
4,477
136
I used it occasionally on a Yonah based Mac mini, in which I had replaced the Yonah by a Merom. It's been a while. I don't even remember anymore whether I used boinc on it only under Linux, or also under OS X. I suspect it was just Linux.

The new Mac Mini is using the new M1 chip @5nm could very well be the new performance per watt leader... unless there is a catch with running mac in general.
The general catch is that not all projects have an application build for OS X.
Initially, no or almost no project will have an application build for OS X on ARM. Perhaps you can use x86 emulation, but won't quite lead in performance per Watt then...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ken g6

StefanR5R

Elite Member
Dec 10, 2016
4,077
4,477
136
PS, so far the Mac OS X platform is a walled garden. If it continues to be, then the adoption rate by Distributed Computing developers, as well as their success rate in stabilization and optimization, are going to be hit and miss.
 

StefanR5R

Elite Member
Dec 10, 2016
4,077
4,477
136
It's Apple's marketing claim versus the editor's opinion.
Further, we have got AnandTech's microbenchmarks of Apple's latest telephone.

Not a lot to go on.

PS, so far the Mac OS X platform is a walled garden
...which is plowed over and replanted before the crop was brought in. (They deprecate hardware, and more so: their software stack, quicker than you can say deprecation.)
 
Last edited:

Endgame124

Senior member
Feb 11, 2008
706
463
136

Markfw

CPU Moderator, VC&G Moderator, Elite Member
Super Moderator
May 16, 2002
21,383
9,449
136
My favorite.... points/watt are hard to beat. 1/2 the cost of a 3990, but half the speed, but more than half the points. $2000 is not bad for 64 cores of efficiency. 4 5950z's may be way faster, but $2400 plus 4 motherboards, not one. And power efficiency is not good comparative. Those would be over 800 watts for 64 cores compared to 200.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Assimilator1

StefanR5R

Elite Member
Dec 10, 2016
4,077
4,477
136
So Andrei estimates 20...24 W package power limit¹ of the M1 in the mini. Then I would say the 8 cores of Ryzen 7 4800U @ 15 W TDP (8 cores with SMT available; 7 nm tech) still compare quite favorably with m1's 4 cores (wider cores but without SMT, plus 4 small companion cores which may or may not be useful in a given scenario; 5 nm tech) in terms of throughput per socket power. The power budget of 4800U can be raised still without appreciable degradation of perf/W, as far as I can tell from the behavior of higher-wattage Zen 2 processors.

Edit,
¹) I should have written processor power limit or something, not package power limit. The package also contains DRAM.
 
Last edited:

StefanR5R

Elite Member
Dec 10, 2016
4,077
4,477
136
There is an attempt to reverse-engineer Apple M1 based computers for a Linux port (https://asahilinux.org/). They will have a go at Mac mini first. Let's just say: This is going to be _very_ difficult.
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY