Seems to me Obama is delaying the particularly painful aspects of the ACA unlawfully. OFC its political what they are both doing but Obama is wrong in not upholding law.
Law and order is like a cornerstone of good civilization. Check my posts from way back where I rail on criminal Bush.
I just leave this here
The government is the potent omnipresent teacher. For good or ill it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that the end justifies the means to declare that the government may commit crimes would bring terrible retribution.
-Louis Brandeis
Two things here. First, while I'm sure there are political concerns involved, the parts delayed were parts which were not properly functioning, so that implementing them on time would have impossible as a practical matter. It's one thing to develop translation software to translate each major employer's software output into the required input - you develop it once and then use it over and over. It's quite another to do that for the many thousand small employers, which in practical terms would have meant calling every single company for definitions on every field. There aren't enough employees in the whole government to do that in a few months. If government utterly fails as in this case, insisting that the fail be embraced on the predetermined schedule is cutting off one's nose to spite one's face.
Second, the main thrust of Obamacare is to empower the unelected bureaucracy, as we've seen with the new "right" of having someone else pay for your birth control. How does it make sense to say it's okay to allow the unelected bureaucracy to determine what the law will be, but they damned well better implement it exactly on schedule? Surely content of the law trumps implementation of the law on the scale of importance.