Body Fat Percentage

mwmorph

Diamond Member
Dec 27, 2004
8,877
1
81
I'm 5'7 ~155-160lbs and whenever I measure my BF% with the tape measure method, I usually get between 8-11%(over the course of a couple of years, it fluctuates) but then I just used one of those scales that measure body fat and it pegged me at 72.3kg, 16.8% and 58% body water under the athletic setting, which I find sort of confusing.

I just redid the tape measure test and came out at 10.5% per the YMCA formula and 19.22 :Q for the Navy formula.

Which is more accurate? I'm starting a fitness regimen and I'd like ot keep track of my results.

edit: oh damn, forgot we now have a health&fitness category, please move mods.
 

oiprocs

Diamond Member
Jun 20, 2001
3,780
2
0
Take a look at 60% of America. Got a clear view?

K, try not to be like that.
 

Colt45

Lifer
Apr 18, 2001
19,720
1
0
quit eating, the hunger pains will go away after a few days. once they come back your body is eating your organs, and your fat is almost zero.
 

Mrvile

Lifer
Oct 16, 2004
14,066
1
0
Why not just pick a formula and go with it? If you're just trying to keep track of results, as long as you keep using the same formula, you'll know that you're improving, and you'll know the rate, as well.
 

lyssword

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2005
5,630
25
91
Originally posted by: mwmorph
I'm 5'7 ~155-160lbs and whenever I measure my BF% with the tape measure method, I usually get between 8-11%(over the course of a couple of years, it fluctuates) but then I just used one of those scales that measure body fat and it pegged me at 72.3kg, 16.8% and 58% body water under the athletic setting, which I find sort of confusing.

I just redid the tape measure test and came out at 10.5% per the YMCA formula and 19.22 :Q for the Navy formula.

Which is more accurate? I'm starting a fitness regimen and I'd like ot keep track of my results.

edit: oh damn, forgot we now have a health&fitness category, please move mods.

Unless you are very muscular, 155-160 lb for 5'7 will be more than 8-11%.
 

mwmorph

Diamond Member
Dec 27, 2004
8,877
1
81
Originally posted by: lyssword
Originally posted by: mwmorph
I'm 5'7 ~155-160lbs and whenever I measure my BF% with the tape measure method, I usually get between 8-11%(over the course of a couple of years, it fluctuates) but then I just used one of those scales that measure body fat and it pegged me at 72.3kg, 16.8% and 58% body water under the athletic setting, which I find sort of confusing.

I just redid the tape measure test and came out at 10.5% per the YMCA formula and 19.22 :Q for the Navy formula.

Which is more accurate? I'm starting a fitness regimen and I'd like ot keep track of my results.

edit: oh damn, forgot we now have a health&fitness category, please move mods.

Unless you are very muscular, 155-160 lb for 5'7 will be more than 8-11%.

I'd say I'm fit, not ripped but above average for my height and weight. I used to play football and at my peak benched around 235 and squatted 345 and dead lifted close to 400 so I do have muscles, it's just that I also have a slight layer of fat over my abs from the holiday season so I'm not sure if I'm still around 11 or closer to 16.

Things I've taken into account are that I have thick thighs and wider shoulders so I have to wear husky or loose fit jeans only and as an asian I have lower bone density statistically than other races.
 

JC86

Senior member
Jan 18, 2007
694
0
0
Not sure what you mean by the tape measure method but at gyms, the trainers measure you with this pinching rulers that they measure on your arms, hips and legs and then compare it with a chart. I heard the most accurate measurement is where they throw you into a pool and do some sort of measurement in there because fat is lighter than water. My ex-trainer told me that most scales that measure body fat are pretty accurate though. take it for what its worth.
 

jhu

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
11,918
9
81
the obvious method is to weigh yourself, then proceed to carve out all of the fat from your body and weigh that. it's a little painful, but you get a pretty accurate percentage.
 

lyssword

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2005
5,630
25
91
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Originally posted by: lyssword
Originally posted by: mwmorph
I'm 5'7 ~155-160lbs and whenever I measure my BF% with the tape measure method, I usually get between 8-11%(over the course of a couple of years, it fluctuates) but then I just used one of those scales that measure body fat and it pegged me at 72.3kg, 16.8% and 58% body water under the athletic setting, which I find sort of confusing.

I just redid the tape measure test and came out at 10.5% per the YMCA formula and 19.22 :Q for the Navy formula.

Which is more accurate? I'm starting a fitness regimen and I'd like ot keep track of my results.

edit: oh damn, forgot we now have a health&fitness category, please move mods.

Unless you are very muscular, 155-160 lb for 5'7 will be more than 8-11%.

I'd say I'm fit, not ripped but above average for my height and weight. I used to play football and at my peak benched around 235 and squatted 345 and dead lifted close to 400 so I do have muscles, it's just that I also have a slight layer of fat over my abs from the holiday season so I'm not sure if I'm still around 11 or closer to 16.

Things I've taken into account are that I have thick thighs and wider shoulders so I have to wear husky or loose fit jeans only and as an asian I have lower bone density statistically than other races.

Ok, then you do have a lot of muscle, you are prolly around 12% my estimate :p I think to have six pack visible one must have below 8-10% that's what I heard.
 

Whisper

Diamond Member
Feb 25, 2000
5,394
2
81
Originally posted by: lyssword
Originally posted by: mwmorph
Originally posted by: lyssword
Originally posted by: mwmorph
I'm 5'7 ~155-160lbs and whenever I measure my BF% with the tape measure method, I usually get between 8-11%(over the course of a couple of years, it fluctuates) but then I just used one of those scales that measure body fat and it pegged me at 72.3kg, 16.8% and 58% body water under the athletic setting, which I find sort of confusing.

I just redid the tape measure test and came out at 10.5% per the YMCA formula and 19.22 :Q for the Navy formula.

Which is more accurate? I'm starting a fitness regimen and I'd like ot keep track of my results.

edit: oh damn, forgot we now have a health&fitness category, please move mods.

Unless you are very muscular, 155-160 lb for 5'7 will be more than 8-11%.

I'd say I'm fit, not ripped but above average for my height and weight. I used to play football and at my peak benched around 235 and squatted 345 and dead lifted close to 400 so I do have muscles, it's just that I also have a slight layer of fat over my abs from the holiday season so I'm not sure if I'm still around 11 or closer to 16.

Things I've taken into account are that I have thick thighs and wider shoulders so I have to wear husky or loose fit jeans only and as an asian I have lower bone density statistically than other races.

Ok, then you do have a lot of muscle, you are prolly around 12% my estimate :p I think to have six pack visible one must have below 8-10% that's what I heard.

Six pack depends largely on genetics, although the numbers I've heard tossed around are usually 10 or 15%.

Calipers are probably the most accurate of the cheap methods to measure bf%, assuming you find someone who's had a good deal of experience with them. Scales can tend to be fairly inaccurate, depending on your make-up and the scale itself.
 

Insomniator

Diamond Member
Oct 23, 2002
6,294
171
106
Interesting, I'm 5 8 160 and about two months ago when I was at my strongest my body fat was ~15%!

you're not my long lost twin are you?

Now I'm probably 155 but with a higher body fat than before.

But actually if you could deadlift ~400 you probably have a lot of muscle on your back that doesn't go away quick thus accounting for a good %.

 

Ika

Lifer
Mar 22, 2006
14,264
3
81
Oh jeez... I'm 5'9", about 160lbs, but I'm weak as hell. Last time I had my body fat measured the caliper method gave me something like a 17% and some electronic handlebar thing gave me a 14.4%. But... i'm quite sure those numbers aren't right anymore, since I can barely bench 100 and my biceps can't rep 25. Time to hit the gym...
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: GenHoth
We have a health and fitness section now! You should check it out

and heres another calculator

http://home.fuse.net/clymer/bmi/

BMI is wholly unreliable and should never be used as a form of measurement. It has been all but thrown out by any serious health professional.

Outside of a hospital your most accurate body fat measure will come from bio-electric impedance (those hand-held analyzers). If you use a high quality product it will be very accurate for measuring change, and fairly accurate for establishing a true level.

Everything else is so inaccurate that there's no reason to even consider using them. If you absolutely must know for sure then schedule a DXA, infrared, or immersion displacement test at a local health facility or hospital. Or, if you have a hundred grand lying around not doing anything, go get yourself an in-vivo neutron activation.