<<Until AOL unbans the use of trillian as an AOL Instatnt Messenger alternative, we have banned all of AOL from our site. If you wish to get access again, complain to AOL about thier monopolistic business practices. GET THEM TO ALLOW TRILLIAN AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THIER AIM CLIENT.>>
Ahh, is it just me or is this wrong? The problem isn't Aol's "monopolistic business practices," but the fact that Trillian is leeching off of the Aol servers. If you owned the servers which store all the information for Buddy Lists, would you want some other third party software (other than yours) to leech off your bandwidth? Maybe some people just don't sit well with the fact that they're favorite little chat program isn't backed by the host. I've always thought that beggars can't be choosers.