The surprise of the century, Blagojevich says he is innocent without going into details. Basically a zero information answer because a guilty or innocent man will declare them self innocent.
And while I am against anyone like Fitzerald from trying the case in the newspapers, it may be time to lay out the evidence that can be admitted into a court of law. Because constitutional rights are constitutional rights no matter what outcome anyone desires, and if Firzgerald's case is based on illegally obtained wiretapping, we have to disregard that evidence. The fact that Blagojevich can appoint someone to fill Obama's seat makes the issue super important, but a compromise could be reached where some other entity makes that appointment. Thus far Blagojevich seems open to that possibility which may buy some time for cooler heads to prevail.
But I would hope a judge makes some rulings on the admissibility of the evidence very soon, and then what is admissible be laid out before the public, because the people of Illinois are owed an answer ASAP, no matter which way the chips falls.
Meanwhile its becoming circus, and Bagojevich's high profile attorney is the clown in chief, the equivalent of a forum troll on a national stage, when we need facts to make valid judgments.
Blogojevich stands accused of verious serious crimes and is really now tainted, I think he owes us a valid defense on the issues rather than merely playing cute.
IMHO, the news conference today did nothing to vindicate Blagojevich leaving his
current behavior in serious doubt as the cancer of confidence grows.