So I'm pretty baffled as to how exactly a handful of people (?) can manage
to overtake a plane using nothing but knives... which brings me to two
questions...
Have planes ever had "security guards" on board? At least internationally,
I believe trains usually do. Why not in the air? Historically I'm
curious if anything like this has ever led to that sort of security - you'd
think if there was ONE armed, plainclothes person on every
flight, the potential for violence would be pretty drastically reduced. Of
course there's the issue of cost and training, but how many people (at this
point) would object to a flat security surcharge on every plane ticket? Or
for that matter, is the airline crew allowed to carry any kind of weapon?
Obviously guns and planes don't mix. Tazers? Clubs?
And I have to look into black boxes. Is the technology there as dated as
the rest of the airline industry? Again they mentioned they record
the last 30 mins of plane activity... with all the recent advancements in
compression and solid state technolgy (128 mb nonvolitile
flashram: $49.95) have those systems been updated?!? For about $1500 I could
imagine a device capable of recording conversations throughout the plane cabin,
with a capacity of easily 120-240 minutes. How hard is it to make something
the size of a brick indestructable? And we all know the refusal to let passengers
use cell phones is utter nonsense. Most of those planes "let you send and
receive email" via their airphone service anyway. Why not have the plane
automatically connect and upload history to a central location every 15 minutes?
Then the only "searching" for the black box would be for the last 15 minutes of
conversation.
The whole thing amazes me. I keep hearing how much planning must have gone
into this attack. I think that's ludicrous. Sounds to me like a handful
of people who got lucky getting into the planes. But planning wise, how
difficult was it to find 4 cross-country flights that left at the same
time?! Clearly there's nothing you can do to stop this sort of violence.
But the low tech approach to mayhem is becoming more and more popular, and
unfortunately I'm sure this success will inspire many more...
to overtake a plane using nothing but knives... which brings me to two
questions...
Have planes ever had "security guards" on board? At least internationally,
I believe trains usually do. Why not in the air? Historically I'm
curious if anything like this has ever led to that sort of security - you'd
think if there was ONE armed, plainclothes person on every
flight, the potential for violence would be pretty drastically reduced. Of
course there's the issue of cost and training, but how many people (at this
point) would object to a flat security surcharge on every plane ticket? Or
for that matter, is the airline crew allowed to carry any kind of weapon?
Obviously guns and planes don't mix. Tazers? Clubs?
And I have to look into black boxes. Is the technology there as dated as
the rest of the airline industry? Again they mentioned they record
the last 30 mins of plane activity... with all the recent advancements in
compression and solid state technolgy (128 mb nonvolitile
flashram: $49.95) have those systems been updated?!? For about $1500 I could
imagine a device capable of recording conversations throughout the plane cabin,
with a capacity of easily 120-240 minutes. How hard is it to make something
the size of a brick indestructable? And we all know the refusal to let passengers
use cell phones is utter nonsense. Most of those planes "let you send and
receive email" via their airphone service anyway. Why not have the plane
automatically connect and upload history to a central location every 15 minutes?
Then the only "searching" for the black box would be for the last 15 minutes of
conversation.
The whole thing amazes me. I keep hearing how much planning must have gone
into this attack. I think that's ludicrous. Sounds to me like a handful
of people who got lucky getting into the planes. But planning wise, how
difficult was it to find 4 cross-country flights that left at the same
time?! Clearly there's nothing you can do to stop this sort of violence.
But the low tech approach to mayhem is becoming more and more popular, and
unfortunately I'm sure this success will inspire many more...