Bisexuality in the year 1000 BC

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,505
2
0
http://www.slate.com/articles/healt...carvings_show_explicit_copulation.single.html

original


This should put to rest any silly and stupid notion that homosexual sex was a modern media/cultural creation.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
29,968
43,592
136
That would be a stupid, silly notion but honestly the only people I've seen dispute that are evangelicals and various other silly holy rollers. Who fuckin cares what they think?


Also, it's 1000 BCE. Just sayin...
 

highland145

Lifer
Oct 12, 2009
43,973
6,334
136
That would be a stupid, silly notion but honestly the only people I've seen dispute that are evangelicals and various other silly holy rollers. Who fuckin cares what they think?
:\ They should read their Bibles more.
 

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,505
2
0
That would be a stupid, silly notion but honestly the only people I've seen dispute that are evangelicals and various other silly holy rollers. Who fuckin cares what they think?

I wouldn't care, but they are in control of the GOP... and, as such, have far too much power.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
I wouldn't care, but they are in control of the GOP... and, as such, have far too much power.

They are not in control.


They have some influence.

Look at al the "Born Again Christians"
Many are Democrats - are they in control of that party?
 

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0

So does the guy having an erect penis towards an animal suggest that bestiality is normal and should be accepted by society too?


This should put to rest any silly and stupid notion that homosexual sex was a modern media/cultural creation.

A third set of figures appear to be bisexual. Combining elements of males and females, they are ithyphallic but wear female headwear, a decoration on the chest, and sometimes a mask

I think it puts to rest the idea that you or the author of the article know what the word bisexual means.
 

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,505
2
0
So does the guy having an erect penis towards an animal suggest that bestiality is normal and should be accepted by society too?

It says that such things are not merely modern media/cultural creations. "Normal" and "accepted by society" are claims I didn't make.

I think it puts to rest the idea that you or the author of the article know what the word bisexual means.

I think you wouldn't know what the definition of bisexual was if you looked it up. If you did, you'd realize that "bisexual" doesn't necessarily mean "attracted to both sexes", it can also mean "showing characteristics of both sexes"... and the context of the article seems to make it clear that it's the characteristics being talked about.

As for the tie-in to homosexuality, perhaps you didn't read this part:

"The last full scene contains no obvious women at all, though the floating bodies on the upper right may be female. Ithyphallic males and a bisexual take part in a frenzied dance. One male seems to have his arm around another while a loner near the bottom seems to be masturbating as a parade of tiny infants streams from his erection. It looks a lot like a frat party."

Masturbating while another guy's cum (tiny infant streams from his erection) is flowing... that falls in the realm of homosexual sex, in case you weren't aware.

Try to read the entire article... and learn how to comprehend what you read.
 
Last edited:

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,505
2
0
They are not in control.


They have some influence.

Look at al the "Born Again Christians"
Many are Democrats - are they in control of that party?

Which party's primary process requires candidates to take a social-conservative tone on social issues?

Answer: it's not the Democratic party.

Yes, they are in control of the GOP. No presidential candidate makes it through the primaries without their support.
 

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
I think you wouldn't know what the definition of bisexual was if you looked it up. If you did, you'd realize that "bisexual" doesn't necessarily mean "attracted to both sexes", it can also mean "showing characteristics of both sexes"... and the context of the article seems to make it clear that it's the characteristics being talked about.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bisexual

First sentence:
Bisexuality is romantic attraction, sexual attraction or behavior toward males and females.

The word you are looking for is hermaphrodite or intersex.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
This should put to rest any silly and stupid notion that homosexual sex was a modern media/cultural creation.

What the fuck goes on in your head? Seriously? This is what you believe other people think?

The old testament was created to civilize people because there were times when men would fuck anything with a hole.
 
Last edited:

blankslate

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2008
8,741
535
126
I believe that this is the proof that is needed to show that bisexuality and by extension homosexuality is a part of some insidious communist plot to undermine America.... :colbert:
 

brandonb

Diamond Member
Oct 17, 2006
3,731
2
0
Also alot of the faces have frowns.
Maybe the idea of bisexuality and homosexuality was frowned upon.
Funny how people spin everything they see.

Biological speaking, taking God out of the picture. Evolution has indicated that homosexual acts does not result in a stronger species. That genetic trait would have long left our DNA before humans were even developed.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,267
126
No one I've ever heard of thinks any of this is new.

From Genesis

So Abraham went back and forth negotiating how many good people had to be found to save the city from destruction. They finally agreed on ten&#8212;if Yahweh could find ten good people in the city of Sodom he would not destroy it. After they concluded their negotiations the Lord Yahweh continued his trip down the road, and Abraham returned to his tent.

A few days later two strangers (who were actually messengers from the Lord Yahweh) came to Sodom in the evening. Lot was sitting near the entrance gate of the city. When Lot saw the strangers, he rose to meet them and bowed to them and, following the custom of his day to welcome strangers to his home, said to them, "Please, sirs, come to my house to spend the night and wash your feet, and then you can rise early and go on your way."

The strangers said, "No; we will spend the night in the town square."

But Lot urged them strongly to accept his invitation, so they finally accepted and came with Lot to his house, where Lot made them a feast, and baked unleavened bread, and they ate. Later that night before they went to bed, there was a commotion outside Lot's house and all the men of the city of Sodom, all the men and boys of city, every one of them, surrounded the house. They shouted to Lot, "Where are the men who came to your house tonight? Bring them out to us, so that we may have sex with them."
 

OBLAMA2009

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2008
6,574
3
0
evidence of bisexuality not found, sorry...

even if the was, does that make it okay just because some primitive subhumans did it? imma gist sayin'...
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,587
6,131
126
What the fuck goes on in your head? Seriously? This is what you believe other people think?

The old testament was created to civilize people because there were times when men would fuck anything with a hole.

Civilized people existed before the Old Testament was written.
 

pauldun170

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2011
9,218
5,226
136
The Romans tolerated homosexuals/bisexuals.


Then their empire fell.


Some might say that the Roman empire embraced Christianity and then they fell.

I'm just going to toss that out there since they were banging dudes during the rise of the roman empire too..

while the barbarians who put a fork in the Roman empire were NOT well known for butt sex, the Ottomans started the whole "empire" thing up again afterwords were into the butt sex.


In summary
Romans tolerated homosexuals, then Da Vinci ate an apple...then John Kennedy was assinated by Oswald...then we landed on the moon
 
Last edited:

pauldun170

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2011
9,218
5,226
136
I also agree that on first skim...the source article doesn't really say much about bisexuality or butt sex.

If someone can find some damn titties in the link then maybe I'll read in detail.