Biostar M7NCD Pro vs. Abit KD7A?

klingsor

Senior member
Apr 26, 2003
317
0
0
I have both boards. Ane because it was reccomended as a good gamers/overclockers board and the Abit because it came with a Fry's combo deal. I'm trying to decide which one to keep and which to build a cheap system for my parents. Anyone hace an opinion about which is a better board?
 

python134r

Member
Sep 18, 2001
25
0
0
Both good boards. I'd go with the biostar cause Ive used it and its a very good overclocker. I hit 420fsb stable 200X11 with a 2500 barton@2310Mhz stable.(1.7vcore,2.8vmem)

The KT400a is a pretty good chipset. I had a msi KT400 and it was ok but the 400a is better in performance. I think I'd stick with the nforce board.
 

Kman211

Junior Member
Jun 25, 2001
6
0
0
I got the same combo from Frys (KD&A with the 2600+). How are you overclocking it? I can't seem to get mine to run at 400 FSB. I have 512 MB of the Corsair PC3200 400mHZ ram, so I am not sure what my problem is.

What kind of results are you getting? And what are your setttings?

 

alexruiz

Platinum Member
Sep 21, 2001
2,836
556
126
Keep the Biostar..... just make sure not to pair it with a sapphire radeon 9600 non pro..... ;)