• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Bioshock Infinite Benchmark GPU

csbin

Senior member
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Biosh...nfinite-Test-Grafikkarte-Benchmark-1061764/2/



DX11

YSlpX4H.png



DX10

A2ozCWA.png
 
win after win for amd at way lesser price than that nvi

Ignoring the fact that this is without the latest drivers from either side, and the Nvidia ones add a reported "up to 41% faster performance" increase, as well as the fact that Nvidia has the fastest card in this graph...

success_baby.jpg
 
Ignoring the fact that this is without the latest drivers from either side, and the Nvidia ones add a reported "up to 41% faster performance" increase, as well as the fact that Nvidia has the fastest card in this graph...
I don't consider the Titan to be in the same market as all of the other cards though, so I would say AMD has a slightly better showing from this graph. It's really close though and we'll have to wait and see about new drivers before making the call.
 
I'm kinda excited to play it! 🙂 There's a new driver out for Nvidia today! Might makes things better. 🙂
 
I don't consider the Titan to be in the same market as all of the other cards though

Well to be fair it isn't, but it's the highest performing single gpu on the consumer market and in the graph 😉

I wonder how accurate 41% is because that would put it above the 7970g

"Up to" allows for tons of leeway, should be interesting that's for sure... Even Tomb Raider is still getting optimizations and performance patches :awe:
 
Ignoring the fact that this is without the latest drivers from either side, and the Nvidia ones add a reported "up to 41% faster performance" increase, as well as the fact that Nvidia has the fastest card in this graph...

success_baby.jpg

1000 USD card beats 400 USD card! Good job Nvidia!

Also, the game is amazing, played like 8 hours of it. Its smooth performance except for some weird stuttering on the elevator.
 
Well to be fair it isn't, but it's the highest performing single gpu on the consumer market and in the graph 😉
Fair enough 😛
I'm getting this title for ps3 since that's what my brother usually plays games on, but I'm looking forward to it nontheless! Jealous of all you guys playing it already 🙁

On topic I'm really impressed with Nvidia's drivers for Tomb Raider. If they can optimize Bioshock as well that would be cool, although it seems that either company will get more than playable frame. We'll find out soon who is on top!
 
The game is ridiculously light on the GPU. I run the game pretty much 100fps everywhere, I only notice it drop when it loads textures going to new areas. When I run vsync my GPU never boosts up to max clocks. Even boosting to 1Ghz is a stretch.

Using 314.22 by the way.
 
Ignoring the fact that this is without the latest drivers from either side, and the Nvidia ones add a reported "up to 41% faster performance" increase, as well as the fact that Nvidia has the fastest card in this graph...

success_baby.jpg

The up to +41% performance increase refers to the 314.07 WHQL driver. This is a more than one month old driver and the in between betas should have these performance increases built it.

They could have used newer drivers though.
 
The game is ridiculously light on the GPU. I run the game pretty much 100fps everywhere, I only notice it drop when it loads textures going to new areas. When I run vsync my GPU never boosts up to max clocks. Even boosting to 1Ghz is a stretch.

Using 314.22 by the way.

yes the game is not gpu hog for high-end cards(not that demanding)
even on mid range cards it will play well taking the fact it stays between 30-40 fps
but low-end cards will struggle or may be non-playable
happy gaming bioshock!!
 
It really makes me wonder, since they went into the trouble of including a benchmark tool, why on earth didn't they make it a proper one? ffs
 
It really makes me wonder, since they went into the trouble of including a benchmark tool, why on earth didn't they make it a proper one? ffs

Benchmarks are relative performance. It doesn't matter if you're getting 30fps or 300, as long as you know the gpu/cpu/whatever is the bottleneck. It makes more sense to use demanding games because of that, but really it's not a big deal.
 
Benchmarks are relative performance. It doesn't matter if you're getting 30fps or 300, as long as you know the gpu/cpu/whatever is the bottleneck. It makes more sense to use demanding games because of that, but really it's not a big deal.

Well, gamegpu.ru's benchmarks show that it can be quite demanding at ultra quality, hence quite interesting as a gpu benchmark.

http://gamegpu.ru/action-/-fps-/-tps/bioshock-infinite-test-gpu.html

bi%201920%20dx11%20ddof.jpg



Also how are you guys seeing the average? I am getting a list of values after the benchmark with many averages, not a single one. Am I doing something wrong? Steam version.
 
Running the #2 benchmark from the .bat file -win32 folder
My overall fps were
avg 56.59 min9 max 236 Overall
Untitled-1_zps1e04e04a.png
 
Benchmark 2 with latest 314.22 drivers

2vtsi0k.jpg


Disregarding the scene change min I get

Min. 32.92
Max. 341.03
Av. 86.26
 
Here is a valid test from Sweclockers with the newest drivers from both: Catalyst 13.3 Beta 3 and Geforce Drivers 314.22 WQHL 🙂
Source: Sweclockers

A ton more valid than that PCgameshardware which have been spreading FUD many times.

Red means "lowest value". green bar means "average value".

3558


3559
 
Last edited:
Back
Top