• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Bioshock 1 vs. 2

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Most of you people can't see the forest for the trees. Both of these games aren't suited for the hopped up, consumer devouring dopes that play games. Especially shooters, I mean look at this comment...

it was just too much of the same core game as Bioshock.

Thats the nature of sequel man. Do you just not get it? Bioshock 2 was continuance of the original Bioshock. Is this serious criticism?

Regardless new Bioshock coming, one in the sky! Something new, something fresh, something to consume!

Back to the question though I thought both were great games. First one dragged a bit and I welcomed the end. Sequel has vast improvements in gameplay that for me added replay value. Environment of Rapture was something unto itself. Then there is the storyline. I mean what game even comes close in trying to tell such tragic and depraved story? Just Cause 2? BioShock deserves credit for trying at the very least.
 
Back
Top