I just purchased and installed a 1.2 ghz 266 Athon (AVIA) on an Abit KT7a-Raid. I can run extremely stable at 1.33 (10x133), even at lower than default voltage, but a 1.4 I won't complete boot process. I typically run with most if not all of my BIOS settings maxed (I have Crucial Ram). I noticed that when I lowered the RAM's aggressiveness (i.e., from Turbo to fast), I could get all the way into windows. 3dMark would still crash, so I'm still not stable.
Here's my question, while it appears to be the case, I ask if lowering other bios settings like the RAM is related to overclocking ability. I am not overclocking the FSB, so I didn't think that these other settings would matter. But my own evidence (albeit limited) shows the opposite. Does one stand a better chance of overclocking the multiplier if these other settings are lowered (e.g., Ram settings, fastwrites, etc.)? And is it worth it to move from 1.33 to 1.4 if you have to slow your Ram timing and other bios tweaks?
Here's my question, while it appears to be the case, I ask if lowering other bios settings like the RAM is related to overclocking ability. I am not overclocking the FSB, so I didn't think that these other settings would matter. But my own evidence (albeit limited) shows the opposite. Does one stand a better chance of overclocking the multiplier if these other settings are lowered (e.g., Ram settings, fastwrites, etc.)? And is it worth it to move from 1.33 to 1.4 if you have to slow your Ram timing and other bios tweaks?