- Nov 20, 1999
- 22,994
- 779
- 126
Now i usually don't watch the news all that much, but i do watch those editorials such as The O'Reilly factor, crossfire, hannity & colmes, etc. Anyway, i respect O'Reilly's opinion on a lot of things (even though i may not always agree with him), but one thing i don't respect about him is his attempt to portray himself as completely objective when it's obvious he has a slant, especially when it has something to with his religious rightwing perspective.
Case in point: Two issues:
1) O'reilly believes that freshmen at the University of North Carolina shouldn't be forced to read the Koran (which i agree with) because it's forcing religious indoctrination on someone else (although i'm sure his motivations for doing so are different than mine)
2) O'reilly also believes that the "Under God" part of the pledge of allegiance should be kept. Which i completely disagree with.
Now excuse me, but isn't the 2nd case worse? You're forcing students to pledge themselves to "God" (and in case you didn't know, God with a capital "G" refers to the Judeo-Christian God while 'god' with a lowercase g refers to all other gods) even though they may not believe in him.
Case in point: Two issues:
1) O'reilly believes that freshmen at the University of North Carolina shouldn't be forced to read the Koran (which i agree with) because it's forcing religious indoctrination on someone else (although i'm sure his motivations for doing so are different than mine)
2) O'reilly also believes that the "Under God" part of the pledge of allegiance should be kept. Which i completely disagree with.
Now excuse me, but isn't the 2nd case worse? You're forcing students to pledge themselves to "God" (and in case you didn't know, God with a capital "G" refers to the Judeo-Christian God while 'god' with a lowercase g refers to all other gods) even though they may not believe in him.
