Ctrackstar126
Senior member
Originally posted by: ndruw
Originally posted by: ThaGrandCow
I read the article, and I say good for him. As popular as it is for the geek community to laugh at Gates, you need to remember that because of him many of you have jobs. As 'cool' as it is to say that only people who kernel edit for Linux and can write their own OS should be allowed to use computers , the fact that Microsoft made software more accessable to the average user that has problems checking email only made for more opportunities. Help desk, in-home support, admining, software engineer, and even sales benefited from the company that he founded; and I'd say that at least half the people here have jobs related directly to what he did for the industry.
As for the inevitable argument that Microsoft stole from Apple... remember that Apple stole the exact same ideas from Xerox, who were going to dump the project anyways and prevent the computer age from ever happening.
I salute Bill Gates and wish him well in his comfortable retirement, and if I could shake his hand I would. His continued work on the charity organization is nothing less than 100% help to society, and the fact that he's continuing on with is is a very generous gesture to the rest of society.
correction, Linux is 100% free as source or as a whole, meaning that people like myself dont have to pay a cent or write a line of code to use or enjoy it...not only that, Gates was the first person to go against the normal custom of freely sharing software, deciding that making proprietary software for sale.
and, I will admit that I applaud him for giving away all the money he does, but when you think about it, the couple hundred million he gives away is like pennies to him - it is no where near as impressive as the guy making 40k a year, supporting a family, paying taxes, and somehow still being able to donate money
...that being said, I believe these "Gates for President 2012" posts are unnecessary, but hey, thats just my opinion
While i believe in the whole open source idea thw question is what wouldv'e happened if he would've made windows open source. Would as many people have adopted it?
Would we first have to choose a distro and then pick wether we wanted a linux or windows kernel?