Bill Gates Pushes Auto Industry on Technology

mobobuff

Lifer
Apr 5, 2004
11,099
1
81
I don't understand what a piece of software could do in order to prevent a crash that a driver couldn't... it's not like it's going to defy the laws of physics. Say a semi in front of you jack-knifes and you can't steer around it without rolling and you can't brake fast enough to prevent a crash... what's the software gonna do? I guess maybe it would be effective in instances were accidents are caused by the incompetence of the driver.

But one thing is for sure, technology and automobiles need a very close relationship, and I'm glad to see Gates pushing it.
 

LordUnum

Golden Member
Jul 3, 2001
1,153
0
0
Would hate to receive a blue screen exiting the freeway at 60MPH.

'Oh sh!t, Bob, what're we gonna do?! Everything's controlled by the OS to keep us from crashing. Now what?!'
'Well, we're going to need to have the dealer re-install Windows GM. As for now...'
<CRASH>
 

QuitBanningMe

Banned
Mar 2, 2005
5,038
2
0
Well I would like an HD screen. The crash proof car seems impossible unless all cars are fitted with it and every curve, red light, stop sign, etc. is documented and sends signals. Sounds like it would be more annoying than anything.

Everything else my car system already does.
 

rocadelpunk

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2001
5,589
1
81
the only usable i think i could imagine from it is doing a breathalyzer (sp) and not letting the car start if you're over a certain limit..
 

WW

Golden Member
Jun 21, 2001
1,514
0
0
Originally posted by: mobobuff
I don't understand what a piece of software could do in order to prevent a crash that a driver couldn't... it's not like it's going to defy the laws of physics. Say a semi in front of you jack-knifes and you can't steer around it without rolling and you can't brake fast enough to prevent a crash... what's the software gonna do? I guess maybe it would be effective in instances were accidents are caused by the incompetence of the driver.

But one thing is for sure, technology and automobiles need a very close relationship, and I'm glad to see Gates pushing it.

maybe the software wouldn't let the driver get so close that the car couldn't stop (the two second rule, etc). Plus, a computer + steering system + stabilization system could prevent a roll over much better than a person....much like ABS can control your brakes faster so that you can stop safer.

of course this stuff is years and years away..
 

flxnimprtmscl

Diamond Member
Jan 30, 2003
7,962
2
0
Originally posted by: imtim83
Originally posted by: Gibson486
Well....hmmm....having a car fix itself would be a pretty hard thing to do....

Your just scared it will put you out of business.

And you most likely have a very very limited knowlege of automotive problems and fixes.
 

QuitBanningMe

Banned
Mar 2, 2005
5,038
2
0
Originally posted by: WW
Originally posted by: mobobuff
I don't understand what a piece of software could do in order to prevent a crash that a driver couldn't... it's not like it's going to defy the laws of physics. Say a semi in front of you jack-knifes and you can't steer around it without rolling and you can't brake fast enough to prevent a crash... what's the software gonna do? I guess maybe it would be effective in instances were accidents are caused by the incompetence of the driver.

But one thing is for sure, technology and automobiles need a very close relationship, and I'm glad to see Gates pushing it.

maybe the software wouldn't let the driver get so close that the car couldn't stop (the two second rule, etc). Plus, a computer + steering system + stabilization system could prevent a roll over much better than a person....much like ABS can control your brakes faster so that you can stop safer.

of course this stuff is years and years away..

That would suck.