BILL GATES / MICROSOFT CAUGHT STEALING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY !

corpspy

Junior Member
May 15, 2006
1
0
0
BILL GATES / MICROSOFT CAUGHT STEALING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY !



THIS IS PART 3 !



The Art of Code Tweaking

known as
"The I'll bury you in court, forever - EFFECT"


-------------

One day, a lecture on "Internet inefficiency" is given and the "obsolesce"
of Search engines, the reasons why search engines are "obsolete" given is such detail.


The replacement of search engines with "Virtual Machines"...
Corporate Thieves have gone "4D". Spying and theft of Corporate Intellectual property is now done subtly via another

dimension, where everybody's secrets are an open book if and only if you are ignorant of that reality.



So WHY would a company "steal" intellectual property from a lecturer
that is aware of the dimension, where such crimes are committed and is even giving the police & FBI a very strong

clue?



Call it, conceit, arrogance - he prefers to call it:


STUPIDITY.


ANYWAY.....



A couple of months later....



2 - 3 more or less, this article was written:
-------------
"MICROSOFT OFFERS MORE TOOLS FOR SEARCH ENGINE"

In the TECHNICAL IMPROVEMENTS Section of The Seattle Times

Microsoft is trying to tackle its declining share in the search
engine market by introducing new tools it says will make
Web searching easier and more efficient.



The search tools debuted late Tuesday on Microsoft's Windows
Live service, at live DOT com along with some cosmetic changes: The search engine has a cleaner look with tabs at

the top for news, images and other categories. Microsoft wants to differentiate itself from Google and other search

engines to attract more users.



Right now the company's MSN Search engine is in third place, behind Google and Yahoo! "Our strategy is plain and

simple," said Christopher Payne, an MSN Search Corporate vice president. "We're trying to build the technical

leadership to answer people's questions better, and then,
hopefully, people will try it.".............



Microsoft is also introducing a way to customize the number
of results that show up on a page. Fewer results on a page would
appear larger and be easier to read.



The company is capping the maximum number of results at 250, or 1,000 for an image-based search, betting that no

one really wants to sift through more than that. The move is risky in that it ratchets up the pressure for Microsoft to

make sure those 250 results are the best and most relevant.



"We've made significant progress on the relevancy of our results and have to invest on improving that area," said Lisa

Gurry, a product manager for the project. "The 250 number absolutely gives us the right level of depth."

-------------



The "tweak" occurred: In changing WHERE the search engine
"limit of searches" occurs - it WAS SUPPOSED TO BE :The WEB search
results not, IMAGES. To limit image search is pure incompetence. Why? If
you do a search for "Images everyone looks at, but don't admit to ,
would you rather have a search limit of "250 - 1,000" or 2,500,000 or more?

 

Linflas

Lifer
Jan 30, 2001
15,395
78
91
Originally posted by: FoBoT
what the heck is that all ab oot?

Africanamerican Avatar? Check
First Post? Check
Loon rantings? Check

Must be a spammer or banned idiot.