Go look at the other thread where Vic squares the blame of Hillary's loss on Sanders. TONS of centrist Democrats despise any critique of liberal media and the pols. It's funny how people have to vote for the more centrist candidate because otherwise the argument goes that people won't vote. Well, why would the centrist Democrats stay home if it's Sanders or Warren? Who sounds more Republican then? it's completely laughable how some on here utilize my past statements that IQ may have a genetic basis to suggest I have significant overlap with Republicans. Arguably a lot the liberals here have it more so than me and some have admitted they voted for Bush or some other Republican president in the past.
I didn't put the blame for Hillary's loss on Sanders, that's a mischaracterization. What I did was refute the claims that his actions, and those of his supporters, had little to no impact (ie BS like "Sanders campaigned for Hillary more than Hillary did"). When those actions clearly did have an impact, as they played right into the Trumpist propaganda campaign that "Bernie got cheated" which did have a rather significant impact on the outcome.
You're also mischaracterizing your past statements that IQ may have a genetic basis. Because if you put it that way, I would agree with you. I mean, of course they do, but only to a limited extent (environment plays a larger role IMO), and is not limited to any single race or skin color. Unfortunately, your statements were that all blacks on average have lower IQs due to genetics, and you stood by those statements even when it was pointed out to you that such a generalization was not possible due to the fact that blacks are more genetically diverse than all other such groups combined.
But anyway.. if you want 4 more years of Trump, of corruption and a President who fancies himself a king who's above the law, with courts stacked with like minded judges, then just keep doing what you're doing, just like in 2016.