****BH7 / P4 3.06 @ 3806 MHz****

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
T

Technonut

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2000
4,041
0
0
***System***

ABIT BH7
P4 3.06 (SL6S5 Pack Date 01/31/03 Malaysia, Week 46/02)
512MB PC2700 Kingston Value RAM (Winbond BH-6)
40GB Maxtor D740-X ATA133
Antec TruePower 550
Radeon 9700 Pro
Acoustic Edge
WinFast TV 2000 XP
WinXP Pro
Prometeia Cooled

VCore @ Default (Floats between 1.488-1.520v)
VDIMM @ 2.85v (Actually between 2.80-2.82v)
HyperThreading: Enabled

**Sandra 2003 Pro**

3070.4 MHz:
133.5 FSB / DDR: 356 MHz (3:4) / 2-5-2-2/ ***CPU: 9577/2646/5793 MEM: 2632/2630 MM: 14158/21790

3221.4 MHz:
140.5 FSB / DDR: 374 MHz (3:4) / 2-5-2-2/***CPU: 10156/2971/6104 MEM: 2778/2775 MM: 14900/22759

3346.5 MHz
145.5 FSB / DDR: 388 MHz (3:4) / 2-5-2-2/***CPU: 10327/2891/6304 MEM: 2881/2878 MM: 15431/24196

3461.4 MHz
150.5 FSB / DDR: 401 MHz (3:4) / 2-5-2-2/***CPU: 10715/2990/6526 MEM: 2976/2972 MM: 15956/25133

3576.5 MHz
155.5 FSB / DDR: 414 MHz (3:4) / 2-5-3-3/***CPU: 11229/3089/6744 MEM: 3039/3034 MM: 16491/25845

3691 MHz (Failed @ Default VCore & +5%.. Stable @ +10% 1.648-1.664v)
160.5 FSB / DDR: 428 MHz (3:4) / 2-5-3-3/***CPU: 11594/3188/6982 MEM: 3150/3149 MM: 17025/26836

3806 MHz
165.5 FSB / DDR: 413 MHz (4:5) / 2-5-3-3/***CPU: 11768/3287/7202 MEM: 3042/3040 MM: 17563/26947

Remainder of results by above FSB and settings: (Radeon 9700 Pro not OC'ed)

PCMark2002........................................................................... Hexus Pifast.....3DMarK2001

133.5 FSB: CPU: 7556 MEM: 7062......................................................71.58.........15699
140.5 FSB: CPU: 7943 MEM: 7397......................................................67.83.........16087
145.5 FSB: CPU: 8227 MEM: 7729......................................................65.55.........16361
150.5 FSB: CPU: 8516 MEM: 7883......................................................63.48.........16622
155.5 FSB: CPU: 8776 MEM: 7833......................................................63.75.........16484
160.5 FSB: CPU: 9062 MEM: 8118......................................................61.44.........16774
165.5 FSB: CPU: 9306 MEM: 8031......................................................61.11.........16723

UT 2003 @ 3.8 GHz:

800x600:.........FB: 261 FPS BM: 91 FPS
1024x768:.......FB: 234 FPS BM: 91 FPS
1280x960:.......FB: 175 FPS BM: 89 FPS
1600x1200:.....FB: 117 FPS BM: 79 FPS

Prime95 Stable @ 3806 MHz.....



EDIT: 3DMark2001 score @ 3.8 GHz is now 17295!! (Thanks to a driver mod that I found) I will take a 572 point jump without having to OC the Radeon anytime. :D

Damn... 3DMark03 score @ 3.8 GHz is: 5120 FPS Info
 
G

gsethi

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2002
3,457
5
81
and i thought my 2.40B @ 3.40 Ghz was a good overclock....
ah well, its time to kick up that VCore to +10% (still using +5% here)......
 
B

Boyne7

Golden Member
Nov 23, 2002
1,575
0
0
Thats definately one nice overclock
gonna try upping the voltage a little?
what cooling u using?


 
T

Technonut

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2000
4,041
0
0
I have close to an 800 MHz OC going on now @ 1.648-1.664v. I am trying my best to keep below 1.70v. (It is hard though :p ) I can run stable @ 3950 MHz, but the voltage exceeds what I am comfortable with for a 3.06.... I can boot into Windows @ 4GHz, but it shortly freezes.

If you look at the benchmarks, it really is not as impressive as it could be. I can live with 3806 MHz / moderate VCore if paired with a good dual channel DDR mobo, but there is nothing out there that I like..... Yet... ;)

EDIT: I just heard a "pop" like sound, and it scared the hell out of me.... turned out to be the TV :) The thought of that 3.06 that HardOCP blew the heatspreader off of with phase-change cooling flashed into my mind at that moment... :Q
 
D

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
Originally posted by: gsethi
and i thought my 2.40B @ 3.40 Ghz was a good overclock....
ah well, its time to kick up that VCore to +10% (still using +5% here)......
Click to expand...


you do!!! No offense to technonut but you paid a lot less (maybe 1/4 of cost to get within 400mhz of him)....


technonut I was about to say Holy Shite!! on the sandra scores until I saw 2003 pro...I have the free download version and evidently they aren't scored the same cause my scores at 3.258 w/ 452ddr was CPU: 8997/4274 MM: 12873/16453 MEM: 3452/3450....My PCmark2002 score were very similar and in proportion to yours...
 
T

Technonut

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2000
4,041
0
0
you do!!! No offense to technonut but you paid a lot less (maybe 1/4 of cost to get within 400mhz of him)....
Click to expand...
No offense taken.... gsethi has a great OC going on, and I think I told him so in his thread.... :)

As for Sandra Pro, AFAIK it benches the same as the freeware version. I just run the benchmarks and report what comes out. The scale of my benchmarks seem to be in proportion to me considering the FSB, memory ratios, and timings.

EDIT: In comparison, here are Sandra results from the same BH7 with my 2.4B C1.. Same WinXP Pro install, same version of Sandra Pro.... The only thing I did differently was to install the 3.06 and enable Hyper-Threading...

3014 MHz / 167.5 MHz FSB / VCore 1.552 / RAM (4:5) 2-7-3-3 / 418.7 MHz

CPU: 7893 1738/3943
MEM: 3098/3088
MM: 12020/15274

EDIT: Another comparison... here are the Sandra results from the Gigabyte SINXP that I had @ 3880 MHz:

CPU: 12068/3348/7355
MM: 17899/27685
Mem:4140/4139 (422 MHz 2-7-2-2 dual channel)

 
D

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
Originally posted by: Technonut
you do!!! No offense to technonut but you paid a lot less (maybe 1/4 of cost to get within 400mhz of him)....
Click to expand...
No offense taken.... gsethi has a great OC going on, and I think I told him so in his thread.... :)

As for Sandra Pro, AFAIK it benches the same as the freeware version. I just run the benchmarks and report what comes out. The scale of my benchmarks seem to be in proportion to me considering the FSB, memory ratios, and timings.

EDIT: In comparison, here are the Sandra results from the Gigabyte SINXP that I had @ 3880 MHz:

CPU: 12068/3348/7355
MM: 17899/27685
Mem:4140/4139 (422 MHz 2-7-2-2 dual channel)
Click to expand...

I just downloaded it the other day...It says 2003....

ref cpu (3.06ghz p4) CPU: 8164/1717/4007
ref cpu (dual 3.06ghz) CPU: 8953/2632/5738

quite a bit different....

 
T

Technonut

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2000
4,041
0
0
My version is: SiSoftware Sandra Professional Unicode (32-bit x86) 2003.1.9.26... What is your freeware version #?
 
D

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
I have sissoft version Standard Unicode (32-bit x86) 2003.3.9.44....


I had old version and just added this one...should I have removed the old one and then installed this one??? I have had multiple versions before but maybe this didn't overwrite completely....It appears to be newer then yours...
 
D

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
complete uninstall and reinstall and same scores as before...must be a pro thing then....
 
T

Technonut

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2000
4,041
0
0
complete uninstall and reinstall and same scores as before...must be a pro thing then....
Click to expand...
I already did.... I uninstalled the Pro version and whacked all of the registry entries. I installed the version that you have... @ 3806 MHz...

HT Disabled.... CPU: 9921/2194/4942

HT Enabled....CPU: 11532/3282/7353

So, it appears that my benchmarks with HT enabled are consistant between the Pro and Standard Sandra versions...
 
D

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
NOw that looks right...Sorry...I should have thought about the HT effecting it...My bad!!! damn must be a nice performance boost running 3.8ghz with HT enabled...

Your cpu score at 3.06ghz is better then a person running non HT could do with a 3.4ghz cpu....The multimedia scores of 21700 can't be done as far as I can see...I can do 3.33ghz and that only get 17000...you are over 20+% oer that and would then require like a 4ghz non Ht cpu....

I would love to do a divx encoding and say capturing some live TV from my AIW card and see how that works...
 
T

Technonut

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2000
4,041
0
0
This has probably been posted elsewhere before, but I just noticed it... I found a software driver mod Here that gave me a 572 point jump in 3DMark2K1 without OCing the Radeon 9700 Pro. From 16723 to 17295. Not bad huh? ;)

EDIT: 3DMark03 in @ 5120...
 
T

Technonut

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2000
4,041
0
0
Originally posted by: DAPUNISHER
I haven't decided if I'm more impressed by the CPU overclock or the 2700 value ram@428DDR............OK I'm just gonna say :Q :Q for both
Click to expand...
Thanks... :) This Kingston Value RAM is great. I have 2 512MB sticks that both like to party... The BH7 seems to have trouble with the 3:4 ratio past 160 MHz FSB. I have run the PC2700 Value RAM rock solid @ 456 MHz before. (2.8v / 2-6-3-3)
 
H

human2k

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2001
3,563
0
0
That is an insance overclock. But not as insane as those 3dmark guys with 4.1-4.2ghz :).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom