- Dec 18, 2001
- 24,036
- 21
- 81
When I started taking classes in 1998, I was a geek among geeks. In programming classes, most students asked questions beyond what the curriculum was meant to teach, and teachers loved to get into these brainstumping scenarios. The student dorm rooms consisted of walls stacked with computer parts and whatever the newest electronic toy was.
After taking a break for a few years, I started taking classes full time again to work towards my bachelors. Six years later I have noticed a new trend. I am now a geek among... slackers. These kids don't care what they're learning, they just want a degree they think is an easy ticket into the real world. They can barely grasp the introductory curriculum. If they miss a question on a final, instead of learning from their mistake, they argue with the instructor about the wording or whatever to get that extra point. Instead of questions like "how can we modify this data structure to process all primes within this array" you get "why is this answer wrong, this is right" or "you never covered typecasting in class".
So sad.
After taking a break for a few years, I started taking classes full time again to work towards my bachelors. Six years later I have noticed a new trend. I am now a geek among... slackers. These kids don't care what they're learning, they just want a degree they think is an easy ticket into the real world. They can barely grasp the introductory curriculum. If they miss a question on a final, instead of learning from their mistake, they argue with the instructor about the wording or whatever to get that extra point. Instead of questions like "how can we modify this data structure to process all primes within this array" you get "why is this answer wrong, this is right" or "you never covered typecasting in class".
So sad.
